Saturday, August 8, 2020

Rapidly reopening Americas society and restoring America’s robust economy....air circulation enhancement plus simple, inexpensive, rapid reading test capabilities

 


 Rapidly reopening Americas society and restoring America’s robust economy....air circulation enhancement plus simple, inexpensive, rapid reading test capabilities

[   POSTING NOTE:  As  of  August 8, 2020  I have not seen any report /evaluation   outlining the introduction and implementation of  a comprehensive testing/ screening strategy   that is low  cost  and   could be be easily administrated, on a wide scale, repetitively.   The closest I’ve seen  to the real-world possibility for this development was a  video presentation and an article by Dr. MIna of .Harvard Medical School. Dr. Mina  discusses exactly what has to be done and why under the current organization/incentive systems this is not being accomplished.

 Dr. Mina’s  approach coupled  with  the utilization of immediately available, well understood air scrubbing  and  air movement technology (which would make the indoor environment equivalent to the outdoor environment ) can provide the low cost, immediate plan of action  that will enable our entire nation  to  rapidly reopen education, commerce, industry etc. 

   I strongly urge  that  the approach of air circulation enhancement plus simple, inexpensive, rapid reading test capabilities  be   quickly  explored as a  key  to rapidly  reopening  Americas society and restoring America’s robust economy.]

1.On testing : Dr.Anne Rimoin[ infectious disease expert, Epidemiology department, UCLA school of medicine]  interview on Fox news  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIb-xDv-mek


2.Q/A on How to Fix COVID-19 Testing with Dr. Michael Mina: Cheap, At Home, Rapid Antigen Tests

MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY

 Dr. Michael Mina from the Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health  answers questions about how cheap (approx. $1), at-home, COVID-19 tests (results in 15 minutes) could be utilized to dramatically slow the spread of this pandemic (and open up schools etc. in a faster and safer way).
 
Dr. Mina's research has shown that the sensitivity of these simple saliva paper antigen tests (the technology already exists) is high enough to detect the vast majority of infectious COVID-19 and could be utilized frequently at home.
 
Article featuring Dr. Mina's ideas published in Harvard Magazine on August 3, 2020 
 
Dr. Mina's New York Times article about a new COVID-19 testing paradigm: 
Dr. Mina's research paper (pre-print): 
 
Michael Mina, MD, Ph.D.'s bio: 
 
Follow Dr. Mina on Twitter: 
 
If you're seeking templates and streamlined ways to contact your governor and representatives in Congress about rapid COVID 19 testing please visit 
 
 Either of these links should work but I put in both  in case there is a problem
 
 


3.     Bill Gates: America's Coronavirus Testing Is ‘Garbage' Beth Baumann 8-8-20


Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates believes the majority of the United States' Wuhan coronavirus tests are "garbage," he told Wired. 

According to the billionaire, our nation's testing system is deeply flawed because of testing reimbursement rates that are determined by the government. 

"The majority of all U.S. tests are complete garbage, wasted. If you don’t care how late the date is and you reimburse at the same level, of course they’re going to take every customer. Because they are making ridiculous money, and it’s mostly rich people that are getting access to that," Gates explained. "You have to have the reimbursement system pay a little bit extra for 24 hours, pay the normal fee for 48 hours, and pay nothing [if it isn’t done by then]. And they will fix it overnight."

Gates helped fund a diagnostic testing program in Seattle. He said the results were quicker and the testing wasn't as intrusive. Instead of relying on a test that requires a swab from the turbinate – the very back of the nostrils – Gates' test utilized a cotton swab from the tip of a person's nose. 

"There’s this thing where the health worker jams the deep turbinate, in the back of your nose, which actually hurts and makes you sneeze on the healthy worker. We showed that the quality of the results can be equivalent if you just put a self-test in the tip of your nose with a cotton swab," he explained. "The FDA made us jump through some hoops to prove that you didn’t need to refrigerate the result, that it could go back in a dry plastic bag, and so on. So the delay there was just normal double-checking, maybe overly careful but not based on some political angle. Because of what we have done at FDA, you can buy these cheaper swabs that are available by the billions. So anybody who’s using the deep turbinate now is just out of date. It’s a mistake, because it slows things down."

The Food and Drug Administration warned about false positives, saying approximately three percent of all tests aren't actually positive.

[ Posting Note: As  of  August 8, 2020  I have not seen any report /evaluation   of a comprehensive testing/ screening strategy   that is  low  cost  and   could be be easily administrated, repetitively.   The closest I’ve seen was a  video presentation and an article by Dr. MIna of . Harvard Medical School. ]

Since the start of the pandemic we have seen flaws in Wuhan coronavirus case numbers and deaths. Texas had to correct their fatality rate. In Orange County, California, 30,000 serology tests – used to detect whether or not a person has antibodies for the virus, suggesting they previously had an infection – were counted in the "cumulative tests to date" figures for five weeks. In Florida, Orlando's positivity rate was said to be 98 percent, when, in reality, it was only 9.4 percent. Part of the issue was the number of clinics and labs that were reporting 100 percent positivity rates.

No comments:

Post a Comment