Friday, September 28, 2018

KAVANAUGH/FORD...Message to the # ME Too movement... operational advice to all commands


Take  all accusations seriously... Have all accusations thoroughly investigated by a  skilled, impartial  outside legal group... Recognize   that, unfortunately, a large  percentage will be  overstated and/or false…..Also  recognize that, unfortunately, a significant percentage will be true…. Then, act  promptly  with determination and vigor on those that are justified.


 The woman’s movement should not demand: “Believe the women”    They should demand: “Listen carefully, investigate carefully, take immediate appropriate action”


 Any experienced divorce lawyer will recognize that in bitter custody battles and bitter divorces unjustified charges of child abuse and unjustified charges of spousal abuse are made in a significant percentage of the cases that  they handle.

 Any mother, wife, daughter son  will be  damaged forever if a son, father or husband is unjustifiably accused. Any victim of a sexual assault will be damaged forever if they do not get an ability to state their  claim and have a thorough investigation made and the perpetrator brought to justice.


 Locally, we went through a nursery school hysteria  where the media and the prosecution used the slogan: " Believe the children.” During  the  several years following the accusations the daughter of the owner lost  her teaching license, the son of the owner was accused of unspecified sex crimes,  the owner and her husband   lost their  pre-school license; the owner and her husband lost their home to foreclosure. Then, the charges were exposed as a hoax. The prosecutor walked away  without any penalty.   The radio reporter,  (who was the girlfriend of  the prosecutor and who  led the public media assault on the family) continued  her career without any penalty.    Life went on in the community and the family that was  innocent was thoroughly  destroyed.

 I had  two personal experiences which dictate my viewpoint. A former secretary of mine came to me in tears stating that she had been  raped at a company  party. Her description of the party and of  her assailants, and all of the surrounding circumstances were complete and fully believable.   I immediately reported this incident to our  corporate security and they reported it immediately to the local police.    A thorough investigation revealed that there had been no such party  and that several of the reported rapists had been on duty  three thousand miles away at the time. Fortunately , for those accused, the investigation took place very shortly after the supposed  date when it was possible to get real-time data as to the location of the accused. The complaint had not been  lying.  She firmly believed  her story. Our dilemma  was what to do since she  was a single mother of two small children who had been an excellent  performer on the job. Our company  psychologist had some theories.  We kept  the woman on payroll but assigned her to a female supervisor.  


  The second one occurred some years ago involving one of my laboratory clerks . She had filed a police report claiming that one of my research assistants  had raped her. The case went to trial and a 100% female jury  heard the evidence and acquitted the  accused  with two hours of deliberation.   Both immediately left our   employ.   I do know that the accused’s  Air Force career was in tatters since although he was acquitted, he became “radioactive’  which meant that  no Air Force command would accept him for assignment.   Several years later, I was told by one of the  accuser's close girlfriends  that the accused was  married and had been separated from his wife but  that he decided to try reconciliation. The  accuser had felt that he   had obtained sex from her    under false pretenses and that the last time that they had sex together she was unwilling but had  complied, not knowing he had already reconciled with  his wife.  When  accuser found out the next morning,  she indeed felt that she had been raped and her immediate reaction was fury and then a trip to the police department.

Relating to Kavanaugh/ Ford:

I have never met Judge Kavanaugh. I have spoken to  Prof. Basley once, when my granddaughter was considering Palo Alto University for studies in psychology. My granddaughter is now   a graduate student at another school. My commonality and interaction  with Dr. Blasey was based on my having taught the same area, as a clinical associate professor at UCLA school of medicine and my  activities as a professor at the University of Southern California  Also, as a native of Brooklyn New York, I was impressed by what  appeared to be Dr Ford’s  cordiality and the apparent idepth of her” "Street Smarts”.

  Obviously, I have no knowledge of any of the circumstances of the situation.  My interest in this affair was stimulated when  the research assistant [ who is exactly   the same age as Dr. Ford]  of a major nationally syndicated  columnist  commented to me that when she was in  a Catholic high school  in Washington her major interest was the Girl Scouts.

However,, I do have extensive experience both with the military and with several civilian institutions relating to this type of claim. I have participated as a independent impartial investigator for a large number of alleged incidents and  for several criminal cases. Also, I am familiar with the "repressed memories  syndrome”  which has cycled  in and out  of acceptability  in clinical psychology circles.

Relating to the polygraph test—it is a test of emotional reactions. If a subject believes that something happened and has "recalled "the scenario, whether or not it happened, it would register for most people as a “truthful response”.

 In those cases where I  was involved, , the subject would be questioned as to details. [ Similar to the approach advocated by Rachel Mitchell.]

Obviously, Ms. Ford claims extensive long-range damage to her relationships, especially with men, based on this   specific incident.    However, by her own account she was much more stricken by the fear that her parents would find out that she had  attended a party where there  had been drinking. Also, her public testimony says that she was most affected by what she described as the loud laughing by her accused assailant and by the other person which she describes as  being present. [ Resentment of her  perceived domination/humiliation.]

 Also, through the years she had offered various explanations of the  initiating factors relating to the  various conditions for which  she had  obtained psychological/psychiatric assistance.

 Dr. Ford claims that she was adversely affected for her last few years of high school and her first several years  of college. This should open Dr. Ford's high school, college, medical and psychiatric records for investigation. Her party activities subsequent to the date of the accused sexual assault should be thoroughly reviewed.[ Her college year book indicates active participation subsequent to that date and endorsement the party scene.]

Questioning should focus on the embedding and surrounding details such as how did she find out about the party?  How  did she get to the party? Exactly whom  did she come with? Did anyone  give her a ride? And how  did she get home from the party? Did she leave immediately or did she leave later?  Did she return and participate in the further drinking? Exactly how  and with whom did she leave the party? How many boys were in the room at that time?  Who was  the other girl the party? Did she alert the other girl as to any possible danger?[ If Dr. Ford did not  alert the other girl to danger, then it is highly likely that Dr. Ford did not perceive situation as dangerous at the time that she left the party.]


   Did she know  Brett Kavanaugh before that night?    Did she  have any contact/relationship with Brett Kavanaugh after that night? Dr. Ford’s  announced   activities and experiences while she was working as a waitress at a bar with a very low reputation while in high school should also be of interest and subject to investigation/disclosure

Possibly some of  the best evidence on which to evaluate the accusations of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford are the contemporaneous writings describing the alcohol fueled party scene at  Holton-Arms School  during  her four years of attendance, her active participation in these parties, and her enthusiastic endorsement of this culture. Media reported that a letter signed by more than 1000 Holton-Arms alumna [most of who had never met Dr. Ford ] had   been issued in support of Dr. Ford . A key statement in this letter  confirmed  the school’s toxic environment when it stated that the experience alleged by Dr Ford" is all too consistent with stories we heard and lived while attending Holton,” adding, “Many of us are survivors ourselves.” 

The writings and photos in these yearbooks and other accounts of Dr. Ford's teenage employment as a waitress in a low-end bar describe in detail  her  very active participation in these activities and her enthusiasm for them. The fourth-year edition of the yearbook shows that her over-the-top enthusiasm remained unabated.

One can only speculate that had a traumatic attack occurred, Dr. Ford would not have written her glowing descriptions of the  active- drinking alcohol induced sexually tinged party scene.


 I am attaching some materials  directly from  Dr. Ford’s yearbooks during her four years at Holton arms. [ links #3 & #4 show photos of the actual pages ]

I assume that you will do your own research on this matter.

 Also,to  give you some ability to evaluate  my background, I am attaching the write up  prepared by the Department of Defense for my activities with various  groups such as the Defense Science Board, etc.


*******

Excerpts and photocopies the pages featuring Dr. Ford and/or contemporaries are attached…"Kavanaugh Accuser HS Yearbooks ….Reveal Drunken Sex Parties, Boasts by Older Holten- Arms  Students of Their Predatory Conquests of Younger Male  High School Students,  Adult Male Dancers – And More.. “  [ linked]





********

No comments:

Post a Comment