MILG-POPS: Obama administration disinformation campaign against President Trump. by John Seaman

THE BIGGEST CORRUPTION SCANDAL IN U.S. HISTORY

T Belman. What follows is 61 page analysis of the biggest corruption scandal in American history by far, namely the conspiracy to unseat President Trump. It is extremely well written and researched. It makes for fascinating reading.

Subject: Obama administration disinformation campaign against President Trump.

To: The American Public

From: John Seaman, Retired DEA Supervisory Agent and former Senior Police Advisor for Anti-Corruption on behalf of DOJ in Afghanistan 2012-2013

As a matter of introduction, I am a retired DEA supervisory agent with over 30 years’ experience in the field of the Rule of law with specialized experience in investigating governmental corruption and transnational narco-terrorist organizations. While in quarantine I took the liberty of doing an exercise, an investigative analysis on all the available open source information1 to ascertain the scope and extent of a False Flag disinformation conspiracy campaign purportedly by the Obama administration and the media in sabotaging the Trump Presidency.

The purpose of this document is to give the reader all the available open source information so the reader can make their own determination as to the creditability of the information presented. The information in this document describes how the modus operandi the “False Flag disinformation operation,” commonly used technique by U.S. and Foreign Intelligence agencies against their Foreign adversaries was used by both the Russians and Obama administration in the 2016 Presidential election in sowing distrust among the citizenry in the U.S. electoral process. The document also answers the billion dollar question of how could a Russian disinformation document the Steele dossier became the centerpiece for U.S. law enforcement and Intelligence efforts that launched the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign which later evolved into the Mueller investigation which resulted in dividing the country along extreme partisans lines among the two major political parties.

There only two plausible explanations, one the FBI, CIA and NSA national security apparatuses were asleep at the switch and negligence by ignoring procedures and Intelligence warning of Russian disinformation in the 2016 election or there was an organized disinformation campaign by the highest level of the U.S. government in obstructing the Trump presidency by attempting a coup against a duly elected President to remove him from office. If you read the information presented in the document you can decide for yourself which explanation is the truth.

Based upon my professional experience in conducting complex criminal conspiracies I have broiler plated down all the voluminous amount of open source information in deciphering the false media stories with the facts for the reader to give the reader not familiar in the investigative and prosecution processes a perspective from an anti-corruption affairs investigator.

Let’s begin this process in looking at this disinformation false flag conspiracy through the prisms of governmental corruption by seeing if the elements of modus operandi of a false flag commonly used method by Intelligence agencies if the elements of a false flag operation meet the sufficiency of evidence standards for conspiracy under Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 which is the general conspiracy statute where two or more people conspired to defraud the United States. This document is solely focused on explaining how the modus operandi of a false flag operation was used by the conspirators in a complex conspiracy to obstruct and remove a duly elected President from office in a silent coup by the Obama administration under the color of authority in abusing the tools of U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

One of the key questions for the Durham investigation to determine is, was there an organized effort by former Obama officials and President Obama prior to leaving office in conspiring with loyalists and partisan ideologues within the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of State (DOS) in forming an “resistance” movement to obstruct the trump presidency and did those involved commit a crime under 18 USC 371, Conspiracy to commit offense or defraud the United States.

It became apparent based upon the voluminous amount of available information, that this was a well-organized covert false flag operation being operated at the highest levels of the Federal government in an ominous political espionage plot in using Russian disinformation obstructing the Executive office of the Presidency in an attempt to remove a duly elected President from office to cover up their alleged crimes of unmasking Americans targeting political figures to gather political information on their opponents; leaking of classified information by members of the Obama administration to their enablers in the media to promote the Trump Russian hoax. The plan was executed perfectly by those involved on two fronts, one by forming an overt resistance movement using numerous front organizations, the other being covert disinformation campaign by a cabal of ideologues in leadership positions with the goal of obstructing and removing a duly elected President from office. It’s also apparent that the decision to authorized such an operation could have only originated from one source, that being President Obama. The January 5, 2017, meeting in the White House between President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Susan Rice, Obama National Security Advisor, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and Director Comey where the contents of the meeting were memorialized in an email by Rice on January 20, 2017, documenting that President Obama made the decision not to inform the incoming President that he was under investigation and that the FBI and the Intelligence community could withhold intelligence information on Russia from the new administration using the FBI Trump Russian collusion investigation as the reason for withholding national security concerns over Russia as the legal justification for withholding the information. [Note: As former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy said in his book “Ball of collusion,” counterintelligence investigations are done by the FBI but they are done for the President. McCarthy said when FBI agent Peter Strzok got back from London after his secret interviews with Steele, he was told, “the white house is running this.”]

The prosecution theory of this conspiracy is simple. President Obama while in office allegedly conspired with the leadership of the FBI Director James Comey, Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe, CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and the DOJ, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and others co-conspirators using their official positions under the color of authority in abusing and weaponizing the use of Intelligence and law enforcement tools. After the election of Donald J. Trump as President, the conspirators staged managed disinformation campaign with selected media outlets to prevent the incoming Trump administration from discovering their crimes. Finding from DOJ/IG and Intelligence Community IG reports found evidence of unauthorized unmasking of American citizens, obtaining FISA warrants under false pretense to spy on the Trump campaign and using Russian disinformation. It’s alleged that the conspirators conspired in a nefarious plot by manipulating legitimate raw intelligence in the Intelligence Community Assessment review claiming that the Russians favored Trump over Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election when new release information shows the Russians were indifferent as to who won. The conspirators within the CIA by combining the manipulated intelligence information in the Intelligence Community Assessment review with the Russian disinformation in the Steele dossier became the foundation pieces for the false flag conspiracy campaign narrative. The narrative that Trump and members of his campaign were corrupt and had colluded with the Russians to influence the 2016 Presidential election in favor of Trump insinuating that Trump was an illegitimate President. This false flag narrative constructed by the conspirators became the basis for the False Flag disinformation conspiracy campaign to sabotage the incoming Trump administration. There plot could not have occurred without the assistance of Obama supporters in the media who assisted and promoted the theme of Trump-Russian collusion and illegitimacy of the Trump Presidency to deceive the public and turn public opinion against President Trump. By combining the elements of a false flag operation with the elements of conspiracy strengthen the sufficiency of evidence in meeting the legal requirements for obstruction of the Executive Branch under Title 18 U.S.C. 371, for indictments and convictions. By using the false flag conspiracy theory clarifies to the public how the conspirators abused the color of authority to sabotage the Trump Presidency and takes away the media narrative of saying those charged are patriots and that the Durham investigation is political retribution by the Trump administration.

Facts that are not in dispute is Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State for four years and conducted official government business using a non-secure private server exposing classified information. The FBI found that President Obama was using a pseudonymous email account and had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account. The FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton purported that the Russians and possibly others foreign adversaries had gained access to Hillary Clinton server and those email chains who had corresponded with her to include President Obama may have been compromised. The DOJ/IG finding that FBI Supervisory Agent Peter Strzok, responsible for counter-intelligence and the supervisory agent on the investigation of Hillary Clinton and FBI Lawyer Lisa Page, team member of FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation of President Trump, both were communicating over non-secure communication devices exposing sensitive information to foreign adversaries that could have be used against them or those they were investigating for blackmail purposes. It is hoped that the Durham investigation will address the blackmail issue if any Obama administration officials, FBI officials or the targets of their investigations were being black mailed or pressured by the Russians or any other foreign adversaries. [Note: Sally Yates, the Deputy Attorney at the time use the blackmail reasoning against General Flynn to convince the Trump administration that the Russians had comprising information on Flynn that could be used to blackmail him as one of the reasons why Flynn should be fired.] Hopefully in the interest of transparency, the email communications exchanges between President Obama and Clinton can be unsealed as part of the Durham criminal investigation in determining if any collusion between the Russians and the Obama administration occurred and if U.S. laws were violated. President Obama invoked executive presidential-records privilege and had his communications with Clinton sealed. As the Durham investigation is a criminal investigation claims of executive privilege must yield to demands for disclosure of relevant evidence in criminal prosecutions and hopefully Durham will submit a request to unseal the records. Lastly it is hoped that the Durham investigation will determine why President Obama, Hillary Clinton, and other professionals within the Intelligence Community of the FBI, CIA and U.S. Intelligence Community would purportedly violate their oath of office and forsake their responsibilities in protecting the country from foreign adversaries by using Russian disinformation against a duly elected President. Lastly, since the origins of the FBI and Mueller investigations to conduct investigations into President Trump and his campaign were based upon Russian disinformation and done in bad faith does the exclusionary rule apply to defendants convicted in the Mueller investigation to overturn their convictions? That’s the million-dollar question.

SYNOPSIS

This is a conspiracy that involves the highest levels of the Federal government in conducting a False Flag political espionage campaign prior to and during the 2016 Presidential election and after the election of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States. It involved the formation of a “overt resistance movement and a covert false flag operation,” within the Federal government agencies of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of State (DOS) for the common purpose to obstruct the Trump Presidency. The conspirators consisted of Obama loyalists and ideologues within these Federal agencies purportedly organized by the former President of the United States (POTUS) Barrack Obama and former members of his administration. The information alleges that the sole purpose of the false flag disinformation operation by the Obama administration and the media was to prevent the incoming Trump Administration from discovering their crimes of unmasking Americans for political purposes, abusing their color of authority and using a doctored ICA document and Russian disinformation campaign document Steele dossier in an attempt to sabotage and remove a duly elected President from office. By using the tools of the FBI crossfire Hurricane and Mueller investigations as the weapons to obstruct and remove President Trump from office and using the disinformation in the Steele dossier gave the appearance to the American public that the origins of the FBI and Special Counsel investigations were legally predicated, when the recently released classified information in the DOJ/IG report by the Attorney General determined they were not. The allegations presented are that the conspirators conspired with a complicit media in a disinformation False Flag campaign by leaking information from the FBI investigations in promoting the Trump-Russian hoax from the Steele dossier by conspirators within the Obama administration for the purpose of influencing public opinion and portray the conspirators as patriots instead of corrupt government officials providing the perfect cover to hide the actions of the responsible party of the alleged conspirators within the Obama administration from being discovered.

The conspiracy began prior to the November 4, 2016, and continued after the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States and has been documented through February 2020, which centers around the documented open source substantive over acts which were well documented in official DOJ/IG reports, books and media articles over the last four years which are all intertwined that establishes a pattern of deceiving the public indictive of a false flag operation as the means to obstruct the Executive Office of the Presidency and remove a duly elected President from office:

False Flag Modus Operandi
Pattern of Deception by the Obama administration
The Framing of National Security Advisor General Flynn
Unmasking of Trump Campaign Officials by the Intelligence Community and Obama administration.
Formation of the overt and covert Resistance Movement to obstruct the office of the Presidency.
Sham FBI/DOJ Investigation of Hillary Clinton and Cover up of President Obama and Clinton communicating over unclassified systems exposing Classified Information to Foreign adversaries.
Use of the Russian disinformation Steele Dossier to spy on Trump campaign officials and sabotage President Trump Presidency
Deceiving the American public, the Obama administration and Media disinformation campaign against President Trump.

[Note: An over act is an act committed by one of the co-conspirators which is sufficient to implicate all present members of the conspiracy, as well as those persons later joining the conspiracy. The overt act need not be prohibited by law and can be a lawful act or unlawful act. Each of the overt acts individually may not meet the sufficiency standard of evidence of a crime under 18 USC 371, however when combined with all of the other overt acts provides the pieces of the puzzle in meeting the sufficiency of evidence needed in proving the elements of a false flag conspiracy. The actions of the conspirators showed a pattern of working together with others for the common purpose to deceive the American public by using Russian disinformation in a disinformation campaign with selected members of the American media to obstruct and sabotage the Executive branch of government is consistent with meeting the threshold element “the sincere agreement,” of the crime of a False flag conspiracy against President Trump. By this cabal of elected and unelected bureaucrats positioned in leadership positions within the Executive branch, FBI, CIA, DOJ and DOS allowing Federal Employees to openly violate U.S. Security protocols, investigative/intelligence procedures and U.S. laws with no accountability as documented in the findings of the DOJ/IG reports has clearly contributed to the public lack of trust in the criminal justice system and the institutions, makes a mockery of the Rule of Law that “No one is above the law.”

The arrogance displayed by former Obama administration officials in media interviews over the last three years thinking their actions was serving some higher moral purpose, by openly expressing their disdain and political animas towards President Trump, of admitting in media interviews they manipulated the information and conspired with selected media outlets in assisting their efforts to incriminate Trump for crimes he didn’t commit and obstruct the office of the Presidency, is amazing, as if they believe they are somehow about the law and that there are no consequences for their actions. Conspiring with selective media outlets to advance their disinformation campaign in sabotaging the Trump administration by encouraging federal employees within the Federal government to protect the Obama legacy by resisting the implementation of President Trump’s policies because they perceived Trump policies would undo the policies implemented under the Obama administration. By knowingly using the Russian disinformation Steele dossier as the centerpiece to sabotage the Trump Presidency is evidence of proving the most important element of conspiracy the “sincere agreement” where a cabal of like-minded conspirators working together for the same common purpose to protect their ideological agenda to obstruct the office of the Executive branch by deceiving the public that Trump had colluded with the Russians in an effort to frame and remove Trump at all cost so they could return to power is the ultimate definition of governmental corruption.]

ALLEGED CONSPIRATORS.

Former President Barrack Obama
Former National Security Advisor Susan Rice
Former National Security Council Advisor Ben Rhodes
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper
Former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Brennan
Former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation James Comey
Former Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Andrew McCabe FBI Crossfire Hurricane team
Former Deputy Director for Counter Intelligence, FBI, Peter Strzok FBI Crossfire Hurricane team
Former FBI Legal Counsel, Lisa Page FBI Crossfire Hurricane team
Former Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Powers
Former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates
Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch
Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein
FBI/CIA Informant Stefan Halper
Former FBI Informant Christopher Steele
Azra Turk undercover CIA/FBI asset
Former Australian High Commissioner Alexander Downer
Former Secretary of State and POTUS Candidate Hillary Clinton
Current DOJ employee Bruce Ohr
Nellie Ohr
FBI Supervisory Agent Joe Pientka III FBI Crossfire Hurricane team
FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith FBI Crossfire Hurricane team
Glenn Simpson founder of Fusion GPS
Josef Mifsud
Former FBI Lawyer James Baker FBI Crossfire Hurricane team
FBI Supervisory Agent Bill Prestep FBI Crossfire Hurricane team
Former FBI General Counsel James Baker
FBI Supervisory Agent Rybicki
Former Obama Department of State Victoria Nuland
Former Obama Department of State Jonathan Winer
David Kramer
Sidney Blumenthal
Dana Boente, FBI General Consul

Recommended Charges

Count one would charge a conspiracy to commit offense for the purpose of impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of the Executive Branch and means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful government functions by deceit, craft or trickery (knowingly using Russian disinformation in the Steele Dossier) or at least by means that are dishonest (knowingly falsifying FISA applications and lying to the FISC) by leaking classified and sensitive information to the media promoting the Trump Russian hoax, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 which is the general conspiracy statute where two or more people conspired to defraud the United States.

[Note: Hopefully there will be substantive criminal charges brought by the Durham investigation against each individual conspirator who participated in this conspiracy holding them accountable for their own individual actions in furtherance of the conspiracy. This document was solely focused on how the modus operandi of a false flag operation was used by the conspirators in the overall conspiracy in providing a plausible alternative legal theory of why and how this coup occurred to obstruct and remove a duly elected President in a silent coup using the intelligence and law enforcement apparatuses.]

False Flag Modus Operandi

The definition of a false flag operation is it’s a covert operation designed to deceive; the deception creates the appearance of a particular party, group, or nation being responsible for some activity, disguising the actual source of responsibility.

President Obama on 6 December 2016, tasked CIA Director Brennan to conduct an Intelligence community Assessment (ICA) review on Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential Election. Conspirators in the CIA and FBI identified the Russians as the responsible party behind the hacking of the DNC server and leakers of the information to wiki leaks as the key element needed for their false flag narrative to succeed by using the Russians as the responsible party in masking the role of the conspirators within the Obama administration in the false flag disinformation campaign. The conspirators manipulated legitimate raw intelligence information in the ICA by creating the false narrative that Russia favored Trump over Clinton using intelligence intercepts of Russian communications that some parts in the Steele dossier were corroborated which became the beginning piece of giving the appearance of legitimacy for the false flag conspiracy that President elect Trump had colluded with the Russians in the 2016 Presidential election. The centerpiece of the false flag operation was the Steele dossier, conspirators applied for FISA warrants with information from the ICA and Steele dossier as the legal justification for the issuance of the warrants by the FISC. Only problem the warrant application had been altered leaving out the fact that Carter Page was source for the CIA and the fact that the information in the Steele dossier was Russian disinformation fed to Steele by the Russians through a sub source who had associations with Russian Intelligence. The Conspirators then used the disinformation in the Steele dossier as the legal justification for their plot to investigative and sabotage the Trump Presidency, frame Trump for crimes he didn’t commit and attempted to remove President Trump from office by impeachment.

The Fact that the DOJ/IG discovered that the U.S. Intelligence community knew that Russian Intelligence had infiltrated the Steele network and that the Russians were aware of Steele efforts in collecting unfavorable information on Trump. Its apparent that Russian Intelligence was stage-managing a false flag disinformation campaign against the Obama administration by feeding false information of Trump-Russian collusion to Christopher Steele via a Russian Intelligence source who had become part of the Steele network of Russian sources before the FBI begin its FBI counter-intelligence investigation “Operation Crossfire Hurricane,” which later evolved into the Mueller criminal investigation that the Russians favored Trump over Hillary Clinton and the media promoted the Russian disinformation as part a disinformation campaign by the conspirators within the Obama administration and the media against President Trump which is in and by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation against President Trump.

The pattern of media reporting listed in this report determined that the Obama administration and the media were conducting a massive disinformation campaign using the disinformation from the Steele dossier and leaking classified information to selective Obama supporters in the media in circulating the false information as part of a disinformation campaign to promote the Trump-Russian collusion hoax narrative in deceiving the American public which in and by itself is evidence of a false flag conspiracy to sabotage the Trump Presidential campaign and Presidency.

U.S. law enforcement and Intelligence sources told CNN in February 2017, two weeks after Trump was sworn into office, that CNN reported that some of the information in the Steele dossier was corroborated by Intelligence intercept communications on Russian officials giving the appearance of creditability to the public that the allegations in the Steele dossier of Trump-Russian collusion narrative had merit when our Intelligence agencies knew that Russian Intelligence were the originators of the information in the Steele dossier and fed Steele the disinformation on Trump. It’s highly likely the Russians would have had conversations talking about the information provided to Steele knowing that the conversations were being intercepted by U.S. Intelligence to lend creditability and convince U.S. Intelligence that the information in the Steele dossier was creditable is in and by itself evidence of a false flag operation. Intercepted conversation of foreign officials and adversaries is common practice commonly used by Intelligence agencies throughout the history of spy craft and also used by Intelligence agencies to spread disinformation as exemplified in World War II where U.S. Intelligence used disinformation successfully to convince the Germans that the landings would that place at the Port of Calais to hide the real landings that took place in Normandy.

The fact that the conspirators used the U.S. intelligence community intercepts on the Russians and Russian disinformation from the Steele dossier and talking points from the DNC as legal justification in obtaining FISA warrants by lying to the court that the information was verified. The conspirators knowing that the information in the Steele dossier was Russian disinformation leaked the information to the media who published stories to promote the theme of Trump-Russian collusion in masking their investigative efforts against President Trump under the color of authority, in and of itself is evidence of corrupt intent to obstruct the Trump Presidency.

The facts in the DOJ/IG report that the conspirators within the FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigative team with assistance from the co-conspirators in the CIA and foreign intelligence services (known as the five eyes) used several CIA/FBI/Five eyes agent provocateurs assets, Stephan Halper, Azra Turk, and other foreign intelligence assets Josef Misfsud and former Australian High Commissioner Alexander Downer by arranging entrapment meetings with Trump campaign officials to gather information targeting the Republican Candidate for President, Donald Trump and Trump Campaign Officials Trump in ensnaring the Trump campaign in a plot with the Russians of the Russians releasing hacked emails of Hillary Clinton to Wiki Leaks to influence the 2016 Presidential election, in favor of Presidential Candidate Donald J. Trump. The DOJ/IG found that exculpatory information gathered by these agent provocateurs from their meetings with Trump officials excluded the exculpatory information in the FISA warrant applications which were used by the conspirators as the legal basis to open investigations and gather evidence to obstruct the Trump Presidency using the color of authority, is in and by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation.

The fact in the DOJ/IG report that FBI Crossfire Hurricane team member former FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith altered the contents of the first FISA warrant application to deceive the FISA court that the target of their investigation Carter Page was a Russian asset when the fact was Page had been an asset of the CIA assisting them on collecting information on the Russians. The fact that Clinesmith had falsified an email from the CIA to make Page’ Russian contacts more nefarious when Page had reported his Russian contacts to the CIA. DOJ/IG investigators discovered a text message from Clinesmith showing animas toward trump, one in particular expressed favor towards Hillary and said “Viva le resistance” in weeks after Trump victory is in and by itself evidence of an organized false flag conspiracy operation.

The facts in the DOJ/IG report found that exculpatory information was gathered by these agent provocateurs from their meetings with Trump officials but the exculpatory information was excluded in the FISA warrant applications which were used by the conspirators to open investigations and gather evidence to obstruct the Trump Presidency using the color of authority, is in and by itself evidence of corruption and a false flag conspiracy operation.

The DOJ/IG report highlights the fact that the FBI Crossfire Hurricane team left out exculpatory information from a four- hour recording between an FBI source Stephan Halper and George Papadopoulos, a former Trump campaign aide on October 31, 2016, wherein Papadopoulos denied collusion with the Russians. Halper asked Papadopoulos whether he thought the Russians had hacked the Democratic National Committee (DNC) ahead of the Democratic National convention, and Papadopoulos replied “No,” and Halper asked him a second time if the trump campaign had anything to do with the hacking of the DNC and Papadopoulos replied “No, I know that for a fact.” Papadopoulos told Halpher he was asked the same questions earlier in the year by somebody wherein Papadopoulos told Halpher he told this person it’s illegal where this person said good because if he (Papadopoulos) didn’t tell the truth he would tell the CIA.

The DOJ/IG report showed that the FBI Crossfire Hurricane team left out information in the FISA application that the Russian collusion narrative was flawed as referenced in the declassified footnotes in the DOJ IG report on FBI misconduct by failing to disclose to the court, that Steele main source of information for the basis of the Steele dossier was Sergei Millian identified as person 1, who was rumored to be linked to Russian Intelligence and was a former KGB/SVR intelligence officer. That Millian was part of a Russian false flag disinformation campaign to denigrate US foreign relations. That the Russian Intelligence service had infiltrated Steele network of Russian sub sources and that the information provided to Steele by Millian was false. That Steele leaked the dossier to Yahoo news which and widely disseminated in the media alleging that Russian officials obtained compromising information about Trump’s personal behavior when he visited Moscow for the 2013 Miss Universe pageant that was false. That many of Steele oligarch contacts referenced in the dossier had associations with Russian organized crime groups and corrupt Russian officials. The facts showed that Steele lied in saying he had a network of sources for basis of the information for the dossier when the fact show the information came from one source, Sergei Millan. The fact that the basis of the FBI investigation was founded on false pretense with no legal basis and after learning that the information in the Steele dossier was from Russian Intelligence, the FBI Crossfire Hurricane team continued to investigate President Trump and members of his campaign and later evolved into the Mueller investigation is in and by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation to sabotage the Trump Presidency.

According to the DOJ/IG report in late December 2016, DOJ Attorney Bruce Ohr met with FBI Crossfire Hurricane team member FBI Supervisory Agent Joe Pientka wherein Ohr told Pientka that he (Ohr) had met with the owner of fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson and Simpson told Ohr that he had assessed that Millian was a Russian Intelligence Service officer who was central in connecting Trump to Russia. By the FBI Crossfire Hurricane team leaving out this information in the FISA warrant applications is in and of itself evidence designed to deceive the court and the public by continuing the false appearance that Trump campaign officials were involved with the Russians to influence the 2016 Presidential election is in and by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation.

The allegation that Director Comey, Assistant FBI Director McCabe, CIA Director Brennan and National Intelligence Director Clapper leaked information to their political operatives in the media in using the media to promote their Trump Russian False Flag collusion hoax, despite exculpatory and contradictory information, only legitimized the media false narrative to the American public. For three and half years the public was fed a healthy diet of leaks, innuendos and false information by these co-conspirators to their enablers in the media implying that President Trump and his campaign were part of a Russian operation to spread disinformation in an effort to hide their own actions is in and by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation.

The formation of overt political action committees (PACs) by former Obama administration officials as front organizations to overtly encourage Federal Employees within the Federal bureaucracy to form resistance cells to obstruct the Trump Presidency while hiding from public view the actions of those involved in the covert conspiracy false flag operation, working together with the same purpose of obstructing the Executive branch, is in and by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation.

The most compelling fact is the conspirators within the FBI and the Obama administration ignored the law by using a Russian produced disinformation document as the means in covering up their corruption and protecting the Obama legacy is evident by how the ideologues within the FBI conducted the investigations into Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. For four years Secretary of State Hillary Clinton conducted official government business using an unsecure private server and during the investigation the FBI discovered that President Obama had been communicating with Clinton using a pseudonymous email that were stored on Clinton private unsecure email server exposing classified information to foreign adversaries in violation of security procedures and U.S. law. When it came to Hillary Clinton and President Obama, the conspirators within the FBI investigating Hillary Clinton email server ignored the regulations that govern criminal investigations and handling of classified information of ignoring the exposure of CI information to foreign adversaries, Clinton conflicting statements; Clinton actions of destroying evidence after receipt of a Congressional subpoena and the transfer of classified information by state department officials and Clinton aides from government secured CI systems to Clinton unsecure email server. By the DOJ AG abdicating her responsibilities by allowing the FBI Director to defer the decision not to prosecute Clinton based upon a made-up legal theory that Ms. Clinton did not intentionally violated the law goes to the intent of those involved to exonerate Clinton at all cost and highlighted the extent of governmental corruption .

Comparing the two investigations by the conspirators within the FBI and DOJ into Candidate and President Trump with that of Hillary Clinton, the facts show that there was a two- tier justice system operating within the FBI and the DOJ exposing how corrupted the judicial system had become under the Obama administration wherein criminal violations of the law by Clinton, President Obama and her aides were ignored or not pursued and in the Trump investigation no stone was left unturned and innocent people charged with crimes they didn’t commit. The facts uncovered in the DOJ/IG investigation the FBI and DOJ investigation into President Trump show that there was no legal basis to open an investigation into Trump and Trump campaign officials; that the origins of the fraudulent FBI investigation were based upon manipulated intelligence in the Intelligence Community assessment (ICA) and manufactured Russian disinformation as evidence in the Steele dossier. When Trump was briefed by Brennan, Clapper, Rogers and Comey on the results of the ICA assessment, on January 6, 2017, and after the ICA briefing, Comey briefed Trump alone about the contents of the Steele dossier, he left out the fact that the FBI was conducting an investigation into Carter Page and that the FBI and CIA knew the information in the Steele dossier was Russian disinformation. The fact that there was a cabal of people within the FBI and DOJ who aligned with or sympathetic with other conspirators in the Obama administration to promote their ideological agenda by abusing their color of authority in order to protect the Obama legacy to frame a Candidate for President of the U.S. and pursuing trump campaign officials for crimes they didn’t commit all based upon Russian disinformation which is in and by itself is evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation.

The allegation is that President Obama made the decision on January 5, 2017, at his meeting with the FBI and DOJ not to tell the Incoming President he was under investigation by the FBI and to withhold intelligence information regarding Russia from the incoming administration and is the person solely responsible for authorizing the FBI false flag operation into the Trump campaign knowing that the information in the Steele dossier was Russian disinformation is in and by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy.

The fact that Steele was a former British Intelligence officer with the British Secret Service (MI6) and ran the Russia desk from 2006-2009. Steele retired from MI6 after 22 years of service and started a company called Orbis Business Intelligence. Steele was well versed in the methods of a false flag operation which is standard tradecraft used by those in the Intelligence Community. Steele using the technique of circular reporting circulated his manifesto to other co-conspirators Bruce and Nellie Ohr, Glen Simpson, Victoria Nuland, Jonathan Winer, David Kramer and Sidney Blumenthal who aided in the disinformation campaign in circulating and promoting the dossier as creditable information to the FBI and the media in an by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy.

Lastly, the fact that the biggest law enforcement failure in U.S. history was exposed. The agencies charged with protecting the public from foreign adversaries and governmental corruption, the Inspector General community, FBI and Department of Justice, the Special Counsel (Mueller investigation) and Intelligence Community failed to protect the nation by ignoring the information that an overt and covert resistance movement that had formed within the Federal Bureaucracy fueled by Russian Intelligence disinformation. The failure of these agencies allowed for the most successful false flag operations by the Russian Intelligence Service against the U.S. by a foreign government that resulted in the biggest Security failure in FBI and Intelligence Community history. A conspiracy of elected and unelected bureaucrats purportedly using Russian disinformation to cover up the alleged crimes by both President Obama and Secretary Clinton of mishandling and exposing classified by conducting a covert disinformation false flag operation in undermining a duly elected President based upon their fears and ideological differences with an incoming administration to protect the Obama legacy and believing that they had a patriotic duty to resist because they felt in their opinions President Trump’s policies were a threat to the country and undermining their agencies mission, is in and by itself of evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation.

Using 18 USC 371 as the base charge, the investigative and potential prosecution concept centered on what is known as a wheel conspiracy. In this case the Democratic establishment along with the now former President of the United States Barrack Obama and former Democratic POTUS candidate Hillary Clinton allegedly conspired with members in the media promoting the Trump Russian Hoax are at the center of the wheel, with government employees loyal to Obama and partisan ideologues co-conspirators within the FBI, NSA, State Department and Intelligence Community arrayed around it as spokes. Although each of the government agencies and those employees involved may function independently of one another, they all are engaged in the same conspiracy to obstruct the office of the Presidency using Russian disinformation with the intent and goal to obstruct and remove Trump from office.

Reversing the paradigm and focusing on the prosecution theory that at the highest levels of the Federal government were involved in conducting a political espionage campaign using the apparatuses of the FBI and Intelligence Community prior to the 2016 Presidential election to assist Hillary Clinton and stop Trump from being elected POTUS. After the election of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States, the formation of a “resistance movement,” was purported by the media that former President Obama and a cabal of Obama loyalists and partisan ideologues within the Federal government organized an overt and covert resistance movement to sabotage the Trump Presidency. It’s apparent the reason for the cover up was to prevent the exposure of their crimes. The conspirators used the color of authority in unmasking Trump campaign officials and manipulated a Russian Intelligence disinformation document the “Steele dossier,” and ICA document as the basis for the FBI FISA intercept authorization to spy on Trump Officials and then leaked the information to the media as part of a disinformation campaign by publishing stories encouraging resistance among government employees and agencies to violate their oath of office in resisting incoming Trump administration Presidential decisions to obstruct the office of the President in carrying out his policies and duties is the definition of a false flag conspiracy.

Patterns of Deception by the Conspirators within the Obama administration

The Benghazi Cover Up

The seeds of deception to deceive the American public using the false flag modus operandi by members within the Obama Administration began back in June 2012, when U.S. military forces killed the terrorist Libyan leader Abu Yahya al-libi and after his death Ayman al-Zawahiri, successor to al-Qaeda leader Osama bin-laden, put out a call for Libyan Islamist extremists to seek revenge against America.

In the Benghazi incident the Obama administration created a false flag narrative blaming the attack on a video when they knew that the attackers behind the attack were part of a Libyan al-Qaeda inspired terrorist group. The analysis discovered a disturbing pattern in using the false flag operation method in manipulating Intelligence and manufactured evidence in deceiving the American public, which is exemplified by the actions taken within the Obama administration in the cover up of the Benghazi matter.

On September 11, 2012, members of Ansar-al Sharia attacked the American compound in Benghazi resulting in the in the deaths of four Americans including the U.S. Ambassador in the middle of President Obama re-election campaign. While Americans were still under attack, then Secretary Clinton consulted with President Obama, at about 10 p.m. (EST) and shortly thereafter she issued a public statement saying the violence was not due to a terrorist attack but was in response to an anti-Islamic video from a movie called “Innocence of Muslims. Clinton told her daughter that Al-Qaeda was behind the attack and told the Egyptian Prime Minister, “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack-not a protest. Based on the information we saw we believe the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al-Qaeda.”

After the attack Obama officials in the White House and Intelligence community specifically CIA Director Michael Morrell and Deputy Director Brennan put out a statement that the attacks were demonstrations and left out any mention of ties to al-Qaeda or Islamic terrorist groups, attributing the attacks to the false narrative of the availability of weapons in Libya.

Susan Rice, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations made appearances on the Sunday news shows and said “Our current best estimate, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this begin as, it was a spontaneous-not a premeditated- response to what had transpired in Cairo. In Cairo as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated.”

President Obama told CBS news in the aftermath of the attacks that it was “too early to know.” Three days after the attacks upon arrival of the bodies of the Americans killed, Secretary Clinton said “We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American Embassies over an awful video that we had nothing to do with.”

The Obama State Department released commercial ads condemning the video: “We absolutely reject its content and message,’ and on September 25, 2012, appearance at the United Nations Secretary Clinton repeated the video message and President Obama proclaimed, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

On September 28, 2012, after Obama U.N. speech Obama, 55 year old Nakoula Basseley, the producer of the film was arrested in the dead of night under the ruse of monitoring his computer for violation of his fraud conviction and questioned by federal agents about production of the video and detained without bail and sentenced a year in jail on a parole violation. Obama DOJ shortly thereafter dropped the parole violations related to the video. The media parroted and promoted the theme put out by the Obama administration that the video was reason for the attack in Benghazi suggesting to Muslims worldwide that the blasphemer of the Islam religion had been arrested putting the life of Nakoula Basseley at risk.

On May 20, 2013, at a CIA memorial service for the fallen CIA contract employees, four of the CIA contract employees who repealed the terrorist attack in Benghazi were sequestered in a room to new sign non-Disclosure forms even those they were covered under their prior NDAs, these new NDAs were designed to remind these contractors to remain silent about the attack on the compound and legal consequences of failure to do so. Investigations by the U.S. Senate and Congressional oversights committees who findings concluded that the Clinton State Department ignored the security requests by Ambassador Chris Stevens and failed to protect the outpost in Libya and the Obama administration mislead the American public because of the upcoming presidential election.

The Framing of National Security Advisor General Flynn

The framing of the incoming National Security Advisor General Flynn by using the modus operandi of a false flag operation that Flynn had colluded with the Russians by loyalists within the Obama administration to deceive the public is evidence in of by itself of pattern of a false flag conspiracy. [Note: Due to the fact that this matter is currently under review by the court and DOJ for misconduct by the prosecutors and agents this section is limited to media sources. US intelligence and the FBI had the recorded conversation between General Flynn and US Russian Ambassador Kislyak and knew what Flynn said to Kislyak, so what was the legal and factual basis for the FBI need to interview General Flynn? Logan act violation that hasn’t been legally ruled on its constitutionally and hasn’t been used in 219 years. The senate testimonies of Yates, Comey, Deputy Attorney General Mary McCord and Deputy FBI Director McCabe gave conflicting testimonies what was the basis for Flynn interview. Yates cited a possible violation of the Logan act; McCabe said a desire to gather information on a counterintelligence investigation.]

January 10, 2017, the Steele dossier 35 pages of raw intelligence from anonymous sources containing allegations of misconduct, conspiracy and cooperation between Donald Trump’ Presidential campaign and the Russian government was published by BuzzFeed News.

January 12, 2017, General Flynn conversation with Ambassador Kislyak is leaked to the media.

January 14, 2017, Flynn reportedly told Vice President Pence he did not discuss sanctions with Kislyak according to a New York Times article on February 2, 2017, titled “National Security advisor discussed sanctions with Russian Ambassador despite denials officials say.”

January 15, 2017, Pence is interviewed by John Dickerson, CBS news, Dickerson asked Pence about Flynn’s conversation with Kislyak did it help pave the way for that sort of more temperate response from Russia, Pence responded asserting that Flynn and Kislyak did not discuss anything thing to do with the U.S. decision to expel diplomats or impose censure against Russia.

January 22, 2016, General Flynn is sworn in as Trump’s National Security Advisor.

A week after the Comey told McCabe to send FBI agents to interview General Flynn. Comey said admitted that it was something he ‘probably wouldn’t have done or maybe gotten away with in a more…organized administration. Comey said with other administrations “If the FBI wanted to interview a Senior official, you would work through the White House Counsel office and there’d be discussions and approvals and it would be there. And I thought, its early enough, let’s just send in a couple of guys. McCabe calls Flynn and told him that “people were curious about your conversation with Kislyak, Flynn replied, “You know what I said, because you guys were listening.

January 2, 2017, McCabe called Flynn and told him he was sending over two agents FBI agents Peter Stzok and Joe Pientka to interview General Flynn at the White House. McCabe discourged Flynn he didn’t counsel. [Note: The protocol to interview a Senior Administration official is requested by the Attorney General through the White House Counsel, this did not occur.] They ask Flynn if he recalled any conversation with Kislyak in which expulsions were discussed. Flynn told the agents he might have encouraged Kislayk not to escalate the situation, to keep the Russian response reciprocal or not engage for a tit for tat. Flynn said “not really, I don’t remember. It wasn’t don’t do anything.

January 26, 2016, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates met with Trump White House Consul Don McGahn to warn McGahn that Flynn may have misled the Vice President that Flynn could be blackmailed since the Russians knew that there were discrepancies between what Flynn told Kislyak and what Flynn told VP Pence. [Note: Yates had a copy of the transcript and the FBI agents told Yates that they didn’t think Flynn was being untruthful. Yet Yates and DOJ were so concerned that Flynn could be blacked mail she needed to warn the Trump administration, raises the question. If black mail were the concerns why wasn’t the FBI and DOJ concerned about Hillary Clinton and President Obama being black mailed by the Russians over communicating classified information over an unsecured email system?]

14 February 2017, an article published in The Washington free beacon by Adam Kredo wrote an article former Obama campaign officials waged secret campaign to oust Flynn alleging these former Obama officials, loyalists inside the government planted a series of stories in the national media to discredit Flynn to prevent the trump admin efforts to disclose the secret details of the Iranian US nuclear deal that been hidden from the public by the Obama admin. Insiders familiar with the anti-Flynn campaign told Free Beacon that these Obama loyalists led by former Obama advisor Ben Rhodes created a small task force of Obama loyalists who leaked stories to the media to discredit Flynn’s creditability that they have been plotting for months before Trumps inauguration to establish a set of road blocks before Trumps national security team took office.

April 2017, an article published by Politico by Michael Crowley titled “The Kremlin Candidate,” alleged that the Russian government owned English TV station Russian Television (RT) favored Trump over Clinton. The article mentioned Michael Flynn attending a banquet in December 2015 hosted by RT and sitting next to Vladimir Putin. The article had a quote from an unidentified Senior Obama Official saying, “It’s not usually to America benefit when our intelligence officers-current or former-seek refuge in Russia.

The FBI concluded in January 2017 that Trump national security adviser Mike Flynn was not being deceptive in his interviews with agents and likely suffered from a faulty memory and was not operating as an agent for Russia.

April 24, 2020, an article published on SaraCarter.com by Sara Carter, titled “Stunning Brady Docs Disclosed by Gov Exonerate Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, Defense Says.” Carter reports that new evidence was turned over to Sidney Powell, Flynn’s defense lawyer, by U.S. Attorney Timothy Shea, who obtained the information after an extensive review by attorneys appointed by U.S. Attorney General William Barr to review Flynn’s case. Barr’s team included United States attorney in St. Louis, Jeff Jensen, who is handling the Flynn matter, along with prosecutors from the office of the deputy attorney general, Jeffrey A. Rosen.

Carter reported the documented evidence was sent to Powell by Shea but is under court seal and the that the documents were obtained and analyzed by USA EDMO in March and April 2020 and are provided to you as a result of this ongoing review; additional documents may be forthcoming.

According to Carter, Powell Flynn’ attorney filed a supplement motion to the court as part of Flynn’s prior motions to dismiss Flynn case for egregious government misconduct. The article references to Powell comments made on April 24, 2020, wherein Powell said, “this afternoon, the government produced to Mr. Flynn stunning Brady evidence that proves Mr. Flynn’s allegations of having been deliberately set up and framed by corrupt agents at the top of the FBI.”

Powell said, “It also defeats any argument that the interview of Mr. Flynn on January 24 was material to any ‘investigation.’ The government has deliberately suppressed this evidence from the inception of this prosecution—knowing there was no crime by Mr. Flynn,” she added.

Powell said according to the documents produced by the government Powell “has found further evidence of misconduct by Mr. Van Grack, referring to the DOJ prosecutor in Flynn’s case, Brandon Van Grack. Powell said, “Not only did he make baseless threats to indict Michael G. Flynn, he made a side deal not to prosecute Michael G. Flynn as a material term of the plea agreement, but he required that it be kept secret between himself and the Covington attorneys expressly to avoid the requirement of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). Exs. 1, 2,” she states in the motion.

Powell told Carter “Since August 2016 at the latest, partisan FBI and DOJ leaders conspired to destroy Mr. Flynn,” Powell argued to the court in the motion. “These documents show in their own handwriting and emails that they intended either to create an offense they could prosecute or at least get him fired. Then came the incredible malfeasance of Mr. Van Grack’s and the SCO’s prosecution despite their knowledge there was no crime by Mr. Flynn.”

April 24, 2020, article in the Federalist by Sean Davis, titled “Newly court documents include exculpatory evidence for Michael Flynn.” Davis spoke to an unnamed FBI official who said FBI General Counsel Dana Boente led the charge internally against DOJ’s disclosure of the exculpatory information. Boente served briefly as the Acting Attorney General and signed the second FISA warrant on Carter Page and was the person who leaked Director Comey notes to MSNBC. [Note: Boente was part of the group at DOJ who advised AG Session to recuse himself which led to Rod Rosenstein and then appointment of the Special Counsel.]

April 25, 2020, article in the American Thinker by Thomas Lifson titled “Leak of sealed evidence in the Michael Flynn case points to high ranking deep state operative as a key to the Russia hoax conspiracy at DOJ and FBI.” Article purports that Flynn was the first victim of a conspiracy of senior officials the CIA, DOJ and FBI in a plot to unseat President Trump and sabotage the Trump Presidency,

UNMASKING OF AMERICANS AND TRUMP CAMPAIGN OFFICIALS BY THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY AND OBAMA ADMINISTRATION:

[Note: This is one of the investigative keys in proving the theory that there was a conspiracy within the highest levels of the FBI and Intelligence community and that the Obama administration was involved in unmasking American citizens for political purposes. The names of all those who were unmasked through the NSA and FBI FISA processes and those who requested the unmasking should be analyzed to see if there was a commonalty pattern of unauthorized unmasking’s for political purposes, especially looking at the private contracting entity used by the FBI who received the unauthorized unmasking information from the FBI and the reasons why Obama officials made unmasking requests of trump campaign officials. The issue here is to determine if the unmasking’s by Obama administration officials were done for political purposes, if so, goes to prove motive of why a false flag operation was conducted against the Republican Candidate for President of the United States. Since the names of those unmasked are classified along with who requested the unmasking hopefully Durham investigation will be able to make the determination that either the unmasking was done properly or for nefarious political purposes.]

In 2011, President Obama loosened surveillance “minimization procedures,” lowering the bar for oversight of the communications of American citizens who were incidentally swept up in foreign intelligence surveillances. This change in intelligence collection surveillance procedures allowed the Obama administration to exploit the tools of the U.S. Intelligence community to spy on American citizens in violation of court ordered surveillance procedures.

On March 12, 2013, President Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, and was asked the question whether the National Security Agency (NSA), the intelligence community’s cryptology and signals intelligence powerhouse, collects any type of data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans? Clapper responded “Not wittingly.” After Clapper appearance former NSA contractor Eric Snowden leaked thousands of documents showing the NSA was bulk collecting the domestic phone records of millions of Americans showing that Clapper had lied to Congress. Clapper

On March 9, 2016, Department of Justice oversight issued a finding during a review of FBI/FISA process minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired practices under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers. DOJ found that the FBI employed a large staff of private contractors’ analysts who had access to review FISA information whose data inquiries went well beyond what was necessary to respond to FBI queries. The main finding was the FBI had given FISA data queries information to a private entity not to an assisting a Federal agency. [Note: The identity of the private contracting entity that the FBI used was redacted. The report did not identify how many unauthorized data queries on U.S persons were done nor the identities of the U.S. persons or whom the private entity gave the information too. The Failure of the FBI asking the obvious questions, of and by itself are evidence of systemic corruption of unmasking on part of the FBI.]

April 2016, according to then-National Security Agency (NSA) Director Adm. Mike Rogers Senate testimony after the discovery that outside contractors for the FBI were accessing raw FISA data by the findings of DOJ he directed the NSA’s Office of Compliance to conduct a “fundamental baseline review of compliance associated with 702” at some point in early April 2016.

On the same day of the discovery of the FBI’s use of private contractors, FBI lawyer Lisa Page sent a text to FBI agent Peter Strzok: “Need to try to fix a HUGE who f-up.” Page quickly corrected her typo by texting “Wfo”—an abbreviation for the FBI’s Washington field office. Page would later send another text on the same day, noting, “Need to go meet with Andy again now.” Andy was then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe. [Note: Looking at the time line and the comments made by two of the conspirators regarding their concerns of unmasking by FBI contractors and that they needed to meet with another conspirator McCabe indicates that the unmasking may be evidence of spying on the Trump campaign especially if the records show that any of those unmasked are associated with President Trump.]

October 24, 2016, the U.S. government orally apprised the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court (FISC) of significant non-compliance with National Security Agency minimization procedures involving queries of data acquired practices under Section 702 using U.S. person identifiers.

On October 26, 2016, the FISC court during this hearing ascribed the government failure to disclose the unauthorized data acquired queries to an institutional lack of candor on NSAs part and emphasized that this is a very serious fourth amendment issue.

[Note: Since 2011, NSA procedures have prohibited use of a U.S. person identifiers to query the results of upstream internet collection under section 702.]

Since 2012, findings found use U.S. person identifiers of upstream internet collection under section 702 to query communications which resulted in the unauthorized violations.

October 26, 2016, National Security Agency Inspector General issued a report based upon their findings that NSA Analysts had used U.S. person identifiers to query the results of internet upstream collection even those NSA section 702 minimization procedures prohibited such queries. The IG found during the first months of 2015, that unauthorized data queries occurred. The report fails to identify how many queries were conducted, reasons why they were requested, by whom and whom was the information provided to, failure by the IC/IG to ask the obvious questions, of and by itself is evidence of systemic corruption on part of the NSA.]

On July 25, 2017, President Obama’s former United Nations ambassador Samantha Powers testified before the House Oversight & Government Reform Committee regarding the 260 unmasking requests to “unmask Americans caught up in the surveillance of non-U.S. citizens.”

Powers testified that the unmasking requests may have been in her name but she was not the official requesting the unmasking.

Power’s U.N. job did not have regular intelligence-gathering responsibilities, her name was invoked as the authority for unmasking hundreds of American names in 2016 — averaging more than one American name per day, the investigation found.

National Security Agency Director Adm. Mike Rogers during his Congressional testimony explained that unmasking is handled by the intelligence community in an independent review. Rogers explained that “We [the NSA] apply two criteria in response to their request: number one, you must make the request in writing. Number two, the request must be made on the basis of your official duties, not the fact that you just find this report really interesting and you’re just curious,” he said in June. “It has to tie to your job and finally, I said two but there’s a third criteria, and is the basis of the request must be that you need this identity to understand the intelligence you’re reading.”

Congressional investigators found Samantha Powers, was ‘unmasking’ at such a rapid pace in the final months of the Obama administration that she averaged more than one request for every working day in 2016 – and even sought information in the days leading up to President Trump’s inauguration

Congressional investigators confirmed more than two years ago that there was a massive spike between 2014 and 2016 in the number of names Obama officials asked be unmasked, including dozens involving Trump campaign and transition officials. [Note: If Powers wasn’t the person making the requests and someone else is making requests on behalf of Powers in the Intelligence community, we need to know the identity of the person unmasked, who made the request and why the request was made, and for what purpose especially the names of the persons associated with Trump or his persons on his campaign raises questions about a political motive for the unmasking’s done under her authority.]

Director of National Intelligence Clapper in his Congressional testimony said he requested unmasking of American names “every couple of weeks.” Clapper told Congress he probably made some requests on his way out the door before Trump’s inauguration, but couldn’t recall the specifics.

National Security Advisor Rice initially claimed she knew nothing about the unmasking of surveilled Trump associates. Later, she admitted on MSNBC that she had asked for names of U.S. citizens previously masked in intelligence reports.

IG report noted, during 2016, the Obama administration vastly expanded its searches for information about Americans in the National Security Agency (NSA) database. In 2013, there were 9,500 searches involving 198 Americans. In 2016, that escalated to 30,355 searches of 5,288 Americans.

In 2016, an inspector general found “widespread” abuse of key provisions designed to protect Americans. A FISC judge found so many violations that he described them as an institutional “lack of candor” and “a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.”

Transcript of Senate testimony by Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates (who was fired by President Trump for refusing to defend the travel ban) and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper responded to questions about the extent to which President Trump’s 2016 campaign was spied on by the federal government.

SEN. CHUCK GRASSLEY: Did either of you ever review classified documents, in which Mr. Trump his associates, or members of Congress had been unmasked.

JAMES CLAPPER: Well, yes.

GRASSLEY: You have? Can you give us details here?

CLAPPER: Well. No, I can’t.

GRASSLEY: Ms. Yates, have you?

SALLY YATES: Yes, and I can’t give you details.

GRASSLEY: Did either of you ever share information about unmasked Trump associates or members of Congress with anyone else?

CLAPPER: Um. Well, I’m thinking back of six-and-a-half years, I could have discussed it with either my deputy or my general counsel.

GRASSLEY: Okay, Ms. Yates?

YATES: In the course of the Flynn matter, I had discussions with other members of the intel community — I’m not sure if that is responsive to your question.

GRASSLEY: And in both cases, you can’t give details here?

YATES: No.

CLAPPER: No.

GRASSLEY: Have either of you ever been an anonymous source in a news report about matters relating to Mr. Trump, his associates, or Russia’s attempt to meddle in the election.

CLAPPER: No.

YATES: Of course not.

On March 22, 2017, Rep. Devin Nunes told the media that the Obama administration had conducted incidental surveillance collection and unmasking of Trump administration officials. Nunes said, “I have seen intelligence reports that clearly show that the president-elect and his team were, I guess, at least monitored,” the House intelligence chairman said at the time. “It looks to me like it was all legally collected, but it was essentially a lot of information on the president-elect and his transition team and what they were doing.” Nunes went on to claim that the information was spread across a number of agencies and had “little or no apparent intelligence value.”

On the same day, former National Security Adviser Susan Rice was interviewed by PBS’s Judy Woodruff and asked to respond to Nunes’ accusation that she had unmasked those Trump officials in the waning days of the Obama administration. Here is the exchange:

Woodruff: We’ve been following a disclosure by the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes, that in essence, during the final days of the Obama administration, during the transition, after President Trump had been elected, that he and the people around him may have been caught up in surveillance of foreign individuals in that their identities may have been disclosed. Do you know anything about this?

Rice: I know nothing about this. I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today.

In March, 2017, Susan Rice, Obama’s former national security adviser told House investigators that she had unmasked Senior Trump officials Michael Flynn, Jared Kushner, and Steve Bannon, in an effort “to understand why the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates was in New York late last year.” the Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan had circumvented some diplomatic courtesy. Rice told the investigators that a meeting had reportedly come on the heels of efforts by UAE officials to create a back-channel communication between Russia and incoming Trump administration.

CNN reported ‘The meeting was about ascertaining the Trump team’s view of the region and sharing the UAE’s view of the region and what the U.S. role should be,’ a senior Middle East official told CNN. ‘No one was coming in to sell anything or arrange anything.’

[Note: IG and Congressional Reports indicated unmasking requests from Powers averaging one a day after the election of Donald Trump on Trump Campaign officials, yet no official investigation was conducted by the FBI nor the Intelligence Agencies as to the determination of why the requests were made, by whom made the request using Power’s name and for what purpose and was the law violated. Failure to investigative the unmasking by the FBI and Intelligence community in and by itself is evidence of systemic corruption within the FBI and the Intelligence community in proving an effort of a cover up.]

Formation of the Overt Resistance Movement before and after the election of Donald Trump as POTUS

Overt Resistance Operation

After the 2016, election of President Trump, during the first two months of Presidential transition between the outgoing Obama administration and the incoming Trump administration, (November 4, 2016 – January 20, 2017), that former Obama officials were forming political action committees (PACs) financed by George Soros and other prominent left wing billionaires which enabled by the assistance of their friends in the media encouraged federal employees to form overt resistance cells within their respective agencies. This was widely reported in the media and some of the media reporting attributed the origin movement to President Obama. [Note: The key to all conspiracies is following the money. Who are the major funders in funding the overt resistance movement and is there an evidentiary link between the funders and the organizers is evidence of an overt act in obstructing the office of the Presidency?]

December 2016 in a NYTs editorial opinion piece by Dahlia Lithwaick and David Cohen, called on the Democratic party not to cooperate in the appointment of Donald Trump as President.

December 16, 2016 NYTs Editorial piece by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt titled “Is Donald Trump a threat to democracy”, what’s ironic the editorial attacks Trump for having authorization tendencies and accuses Trump that the safeguards of constitutional checks and balances will not be able to constrain him from protecting our democracy. And yet it was the NYTs that assisted Comey, McCabe another in leaking CI and investigative information regarding the FBI investigation in an effort to turn public opinion against Trump and damage his Presidency.

January 27, 2017, Trump signs and travel ban Executive Order.

January 30, 2017, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates fired by President Trump after Yates instructed Justice Department attorney’s not to defend Trump Executive Travel ban Order.

January 31, 2017, article in the Washington post By Juliet Eilperin, Lisa Rein and Marc Fisher titled “Resistance from within: Federal workers push back against Trump,” said Less than two weeks into Trump’s administration, federal workers are in regular consultation with recently departed Obama-era political appointees about what they can do to push back against the new president’s initiatives. Some federal employees have set up social media accounts to anonymously leak word of changes that Trump appointees are trying to make.

February 1, 2017, an article published in Vanity Fair by Abigail Tracy titled “an anti-Trump resistance movement is growing within the U.S. government, The bureaucracy is fighting back” Ms. Tracy reported that a draft of a State Department letter of dissent made its way through dozens of U.S. embassies abroad, accumulating hundreds of signatures from foreign service officers opposed to Donald Trump’s controversial executive order on immigration. Ms. Tracy interviewed Tom Malinowski, former Assistant Secretary of State for democracy, human rights and labor under President Obama was asked how the opposition emerging at this stage compares to past administrations, Tom Malinowski, who served as Obama’s assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor, sarcastically told the Post, “Is it unusual? .?.?. There’s nothing unusual about the entire national security bureaucracy of the United States feeling like their commander in chief is a threat to U.S. national security. That happens all the time. It’s totally usual. Nothing to worry about.”

February 2, 2017, in a Politico article by Andrew Restuccia, Marianne Levine and Nahal Toosi, titled “Federal workers turn to encryption to thwart Trump Agency employees are turning to Signal and other incognito forms of communication to express their dissent.” Article reported that Federal employees inside the EPA, Foreign Service and Labor Department were worried that President Donald Trump will gut their agencies, so employees were organizing private face-to-face meetings — to organize letters, talk strategy, or contact media outlets and other groups to express their dissent. The article said employees were creating new email addresses, signing up for encrypted messaging apps and looking for other, protected ways to push back against the new administration’s agenda. and obtaining new email addresses, signing up for encrypted messaging apps and looking for other, protected ways to push back against the new administration’s agenda. such as Federal employees worried that President Donald Trump will gut their agencies are creating new email addresses, signing up for encrypted messaging apps and looking for other, protected ways to push back against the new administration’s agenda. The federal employees interviewed for this story stressed that they see themselves as nonpartisan stewards of the government. But several also said they believe they have a duty to speak out if they feel a policy is undermining their mission.

Drafts of the Dissent Channel memo signed by the State Department employees insist, for instance, that instead of protecting U.S. national security through his new executive order on refugees and immigrants, Trump is endangering the United States by bolstering the terrorists’ narrative that the West hates Muslims.

“I think we all have to look within ourselves and say ‘Where is that line that I will not cross?’” one Foreign Service officer said.

11 February 2017, Paul Sperry New York Post opinion piece titled How Obama is scheming to sabotage Trumps Presidency where Obama was quoted making the comments “he was heartened by anti-trump protests after the election,” and stating Obama while still in the WH gave instructions to organizing for action (OFA) following Trump victory and Obama told OFA troops “You’re going to see me early next year and we’re going to be in a position where was can start cooking up great stuff. . Article indicated that Obama had organized a network of left-wing nonprofit led by OFA by opening up 250 offices across the country. OFA evolved from Obamas campaign organization Obama for America and is operated by old Obama aides with 32,525 volunteers nationwide raised 40 million in contributions. (Source OFA federal tax records)

17 February 2017 John Hayward, Breitbart news reported several intelligence insiders have come forward over the past few days to describe a shadow government of Obama holdovers leaking information to detail the Trump presidency making the allegation that former President Obama himself is actively involved citing his establishment of a command post center in Washington DC and continuing his involvement with activists organizations.

September 23, 2017 article in the New York Post by Paul Sperry titled “How Obama is funding the anti-Trump resistance,” Sperry reports according to Congressional sources an estimated $640 million has been diverted into what critics say is an improper, if not unconstitutional, “slush fund” fed from government settlements with JPMorgan Chase and Co., Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. According to Congressional sources the National council of La Raza received 1.5 million from the bank settlement fund, La Raza works closely with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and has teamed up with the anti-Trump resistance group, Indivisible, which was co-founded by La Raza alumnus Angel Padilla. Indivisible is working with La Raza and its affiliates to make sure “any bill that punishes sanctuary cities never goes to Trump’s desk to become law.” National Community Reinvestment coalition received 2.6 million, the liberal housing-rights group has slammed tax-reform proposals by the Trump administration as unfair, while trying to block efforts to privatize mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, claiming doing so would “deepen the racial wealth gap,” and the National Urban League received 1.2 million from the bank-settlement slush fund, the African-American advocacy group solicited its supporters to oppose efforts to repeal Obamacare by signing a letter to senators arguing “African-Americans stand to be disproportionately impacted.” It claimed more than 5 million black people would lose coverage under repeal legislation. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau headed by Richard Cordray an Obama holdover continues to force financial institutions it prosecutes to donate to third-party community organizers. More, penalties in such cases are deposited into the Bureau’s now-$170 million-plus Civil Penalty Fund, which has, in turn, channeled almost $30 million to “consumer advocacy” groups.

2018, article in the New York Times of Loch K. Johnson, an acclaimed scholar of U.S. Intelligence told the NYTs that the U.S. is among the most active participants in election-interference game. “We’ve been doing this kind of thing since the CIA was created in 1947.” “We’ve used posters, pamphlets, mailers, banners-you name it. We planted false information in foreign newspapers. We’ve used what the British called “King George’s cavalry: suitcases of cash.”

Number of news outlets New York Times, Washington Post, Politico and numerous others after Trump stunned the world with his general election win over Hillary Clinton, published articles on the observations of Power. The observations of Powers and those emailing her on her official government account turned more vitriolic, “I am discouraged and frightened. Electing a right-wing president is something, but such a morally repugnant bully!” read a Nov. 14, 2016, email to Power from a sender whose name the State Department redacted for privacy reasons. The email referred to former Trump strategist Stephen Bannon as “an avowed racist” and predicted, “The worst is coming.”

September 5, 2018, New York Times published an article Titled “Senior Trump Official’s Anonymous Op-Ed Reveals ‘Resistance’ Movement within the White House,” by Tierney McAfee. In the article McAfee interviews the anonymous author who wrote an essay, titled “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration,” According to McAfee, the author claims that many senior White House officials are secretly working to “thwart” the president’s “misguided impulses” and “worst inclinations” until he is out of office.

In April 2020 issue of The Atlantic, George Packer wrote an article titled “The President is winning the war on American Institutions.” Packer interviewed James Baker, the former general counsel of the FBI, who acknowledges that many government officials, not excluding himself, went into the administration convinced “that they are either smarter than the president, or that they can hold their own against the president, or that they can protect the institution against the president because they understand the rules and regulations and how it’s supposed to work, and that they will be able to defend the institution that they love or served in previously against what they perceive to be, I will say neutrally, the inappropriate actions of the president. And I think they are fooling themselves. They’re fooling themselves. He’s light-years ahead of them.”

[Note: This investigative analysis of open source documents confirmed AG Barr suspicions of the formation of an organized resistance movement at the highest levels within the Federal Bureaucracy to obstruct the Executive branch and the Trump Presidency. Reviewing the context of Samantha Powers emails could be explained she was distraught that Trump won the election and was voicing her personal opinion but when combined with the effort by the media in promoting the overt resistant movement within the Federal government to obstruct Trump policies, Powers actions during the transition period between the outgoing Obama administration and the incoming Trump administration to arrange media interviews and speeches during her final days in office, clearly aimed to counter the incoming president’s agenda and fan the false flag Trump-Russian narrative promoted on behalf of the Obama administration by the media that Trump might be dangerously soft on matters involving Russia and mercilessly hard on immigrants is in itself evidence of a false flag operation against incoming President Trump to sabotage his Presidency.]

It’s one thing to express one’s political opinion, it’s quite another for government employees to destabilize the Office of the Presidency based upon their personal perceptions and partisan ideological differences. Government employees in trusted rule of law positions or national security positions don’t have a right to abuse their office under the color authority to obstruct the national security policy set by the POTUS. Employees who felt conflicted had an obligation to resign instead some choose to violated their oath of office and the law in joining a sinister covert plot of carrying out a well-planned covert disinformation False Flag operation to obstruct and remove a President from office.

Failure of the Inspector General offices, FBI and DOJ in ignoring all the open source media reporting before and after the election of President Trump warning of the actions of government employees in organizing and setting up shallow communication systems within their agencies to communicate their discontent based upon ideological differences and their perceptions of what is lawful in an effort to challenge and sabotage the policy decisions of an administration, in and of itself indictive of evidence of an organized overt resistance movement that’s threaten democracy itself.

One could argue that by allowing government employees to overtly form resistant cells within the agencies of the Federal Bureaucracy, set the stage for the impeachment of President Trump as evidenced by the recent impeachment proceedings of President Trump who basis for removal originated from a questionable whistle blower complaint by a government employee who had expressed political animas and bias toward the President based upon hearsay information from a leaked classified Presidential conversation.]

Covert Resistance Operation

The open source documents exposed that a cabal of high-level Obama leftovers in the FBI, CIA, DOJ and the State Department under the authority of President Obama alleging they abused their color of authority by ignoring agencies security and investigative guidelines in planning a covert a false flag operation by manipulating the information in the ICA and using Russian disinformation document, the Steele Dossier in implementing a False Flag disinformation operation against the Trump administration with assistance a complicit media. The media willfully promoted the false flag theme of the Trump-Russian hoax to deceive and influence the American public in believing that Trump won the election with the help of the Russians, that Trump was traitor and that Trump’s election was illegitimate.

The information present will show that the false flag operation was an effort by conspirators within the Obama administration to cover up and conceal the unauthorized unmasking of Americans and unmasking of Trump campaign officials, knowingly using disinformation by Russian Intelligence the fake Steele dossier as the basis to obtain FISA warrants on false pretense to spy on the trump and his campaign.

Obama on January 5, 2017, held a meeting with Susan Rice, Obama National Security Advisor, Vice President Joe Biden, FBI Director James Comey and Acting Attorney General Sally Yates wherein Obama made the decision that the FBI would not inform Trump administration of the FBI Counter-Intelligence Cross Fire Hurricane investigation in withholding classified information from Trump and his incoming administration using the justification of national security that Trump and his campaign cannot be trusted with foreign intelligence because he was under FBI investigation.

The Russian disinformation Steele dossier was leaked to the media by Steele who assisted in promoting the Trump Russian hoax to the public that President Trump was a Russian asset in encouraging government employees to resist Trump, portraying the resisters as patriots doing their patriotic duty.

11 February 2017, Paul Sperry New York Post opinion piece titled How Obama is scheming to sabotage Trumps Presidency where Obama was quoted making the comments “he was heartened by anti-Trump protests after the election,” and stating Obama while still in the WH gave instructions to organizing for action (OFA) following Trump victory and Obama told OFA troops “You’re going to see me early next year and we’re going to be in a position where was can start cooking up great stuff.” The reporter purported that Obama had organized a network of left-wing nonprofits led by OFA by opening up 250 offices across the country. OFA evolved from Obamas campaign organization Obama for America and is operated by old Obama aides with 32,525 volunteers nationwide raised 40 million in contributions. (Source OFA federal tax records)

14 February 2017, an article published in The Washington free beacon by Adam Kredo wrote an article former Obama campaign officials waged secret campaign to oust Flynn alleging these former Obama officials, loyalists inside the government planted a series of stories in the national media to discredit Flynn to prevent the trump admin efforts to disclose the secret details of the Iranian US nuclear deal that been hidden from the public by the Obama admin. Insiders familiar with the anti-Flynn campaign told Free Beacon that these Obama loyalists led by former Obama advisor Ben Rhodes created a small task force of Obama loyalists who leaked stories to the media to discredit Flynn’s creditability that they have been plotting for months before Trumps inauguration to establish a set of road blocks before Trumps national security team took office.

17 February 2017 John Hayward, Breitbart news reported several intelligence insiders have come forward over the past few days to describe a shadow government of Obama holdovers leaking information to detail the Trump presidency making the allegation that former President Obama himself is actively involved citing his establishment of a command post center in Washington DC and continuing his involvement with activists organizations

On January 20, 2017, on the day of Trump swearing in as POTUS, Obama outgoing National Security Advisor Susan Rice sent an email to herself documenting a meeting on January 5. 2017, between President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, former FBI Director Comey and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates regarding the Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election in her email Rice wrote: President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue handled by the Intelligence and Law enforcement communities “by the book.” [Note: Why would President Obama tell Acting AG Yates and the FBI Director the two officials tasked with ensuring that the Rule of law is not violated, ensuring the issue handled by the intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book,” it insinuates that President Obama has knowledge that the FBI Crossfire Hurricane wasn’t done by the book and is and by itself evidence of knowledge of the FBI investigation and Intelligence efforts against President elect Trump.

Rice in her email stated, The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team proceed as it normally would by the book. From a national security perspective, however President Obama said he wants to be sure that as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason, we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia. The President asked Comey to inform him if anything change in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would. [Note: The key statement attributed to President Obama in Rice’s email is “Obama said he wants to be sure that as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason, we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia,” is and by itself evidence of knowledge of the FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation of President elect Trump.]

Why would Rice need to write an email on the day of Trump was sworn in as President documenting a meeting that took place 15 days prior for President Obama to tell the Director of the FBI and the Acting Attorney General of the United States that they needed to follow the law in their investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election which is by itself evidence that the FBI and DOJ had not followed the law in the past. Any reasonable person would conclude that Rice wrote the email to provide Obama with a cover story of denial plausibility of having any knowledge of the FBI illegalities in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation to distance Obama from the conspirators of knowingly and willfully using the Russian Intelligence produced disinformation dossier as the basis for the FBI and DOJ Trump-Russian collusion investigation of Trump in fraudulently obtaining a FISA court intercept warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.

In early January 2017, outgoing President Obama issued an executive order directing the NSA to distribute the data collected via wiretapping, and the December 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) review, be distributed to all of the 16 other U.S. intelligence agencies. [Note: Since the creation of the NSA the law said that the data collected via wiretapping, etc., must be retained solely within the NSA. The executive action by President Obama made it possible for his administration to leak Classified information to the media as making it very difficult to find the leakers among 17 intelligence agencies. Explains why no one has been held accountable for the leaks to the media on the conversations between General Flynn and the Russian Ambassador and the conversations between President Elect Trump and the President of Mexico and the Prime Minister of Australia. The media reported the false narrative giving the appearance that all 17 U.S. Intelligence agencies had concluded with the ICA assessment that the Russians interfered in the 2016 elections favoring Trump when the fact was that only two agencies the CIA and FBI said there was high probability and the NSA said there was moderate probability that the Russian government interfered with the 2016 Presidential election in favor of Trump. Knowing that the FBI and CIA had manipulated the ICA that the Russians favor Trump and that the Obama administration knew the information in the Steele dossier came from Russian Intelligence along with the timing of President Obama executive order in a by itself evidence of corrupt intent of a false flag conspiracy to obstruct Candidate Trump prior to the election and after the 2016 Presidential election.]

On January 6, 2017, President elect Trump was briefed by Brennan, Clapper, Rogers and Comey on the results of the IC assessment and after the briefing, Comey briefed Trump alone about the contents of the Steele dossier specifically the pee story. The fact that Trump was not briefed on the FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation on the FBI investigation President Trump by Director Comey and that CIA Director Brennan and National Intelligence Director Clapper left out the fact that they knew that the information in the ICA had been manipulated and that the information in the Steele dossier came from Russian Intelligence. The problem for President Obama, Comey, Rice, Brennan and Clapper is that they knew the contents in the Steele dossier was bogus, unverifiable and was Russian disinformation from the start which is in and by itself evidence of intent to deceive the duly elected President of the United States.

A USIC report dated February 27, 2017, contained information about an individual with reported connections to Trump and Russia who claimed that the public reporting about the details of Trump’s sexual activities in Moscow during a trip in 2013 were false, and that they were the product of RIS (Russian Intelligence) “infiltrate[ing] a source into the network” of a who compiled a dossier of that individual on Trump’s activities.

The footnote, combined with previous disclosures inside the Justice Department’s Inspector General probe of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team investigating Trump, raises immediate questions about Comey’s personal involvement in promoting the embarrassing smear about Trump.

Christopher Steele’s dossier infamously claimed that while Trump was staying in the presidential suite at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Moscow in 2013, the real estate mogul hired “a number of prostitutes to perform a ‘golden showers’ (urination) show in front of him.” The dossier claims Trump wanted to “defile” the bed because he learned that President Obama had used the same suite during a trip to Russia.

Allegedly the problem for President Obama, Comey, Rice, Brennan and Clapper is that they knew the contents in the Steele dossier was bogus, unverifiable and was Russian disinformation from the start which is in and by itself evidence of intent to deceive the duly elected President of the United States.

Only two scenarios apply here, either President Obama was never told by the Senior Leadership in the FBI, CIA or those in the U.S. Intelligence Community that the some of the information in the Intelligence Community Assessment and all of the information in the Steele dossier came from Russian Intelligence which means President Obama was lied too by his advisors which would mean there a shadow government of unelected bureaucrats operating within the government or that President Obama was complicit in the conspiracy to obstruct the Trump Presidency by authorizing the FBI false flag investigation under the color of authority with the knowledge that the information in the Steele dossier was disinformation from Russian Intelligence. The mere fact of comments by President Obama advising the Director of the FBI, Director of the CIA, and the National Director of Intelligence not to share classified information on Russian on January 6, 2017, briefing to President elect Trump is in and by itself evidence of President Obama knowledge and intent to obstruct the Trump Presidency.

If any of the allegations of a covert false flag operation are proven to be true by the Durham investigation than those involved criminally would be in violation of 18 USC 371, Conspiracy to commit offense or defraud the United States and all could be prosecuted under this criminal statue. This would be the biggest political scandal in U.S. History and create a constitutional crisis of major proportions that the transfer of Presidential authority wasn’t fully transferred by an outgoing President authorizing an investigation into an incoming President. It is inconceivable that a false flag operation could have occurred without the knowledge or authorization from President Obama. This is the elephant in the room and why Durham investigation matters in holding those accountable and restoring the public faith in the Rule of Law.

The emails between the FBI members Peter Strozk and Lisa Page describing Trump supporters as loathsome deplorables and their animas toward Trump confirmed their political bias and after Strzok returned from his trip in London texting Page “POTUS wants to know everything were doing,” is evidence of Obama having knowledge of the FBI investigation Crossfire Hurricane. Strzok text to page referring to an Insurance policy about an issue they had discussed in McCabe office is evidence of itself of a False flag conspiracy coup against Candidate Trump and then President Trump.

The findings of facts in the Inspector General Report which documented that failures of the FBI to follow their own investigative protocols in verifying the source of the allegations against President Trump; the redacted notes that confirm the FBI knew the information in the Steele dossier was Russian disinformation provided to Steele by Russian Intelligence but was used by the FBI to deceive FISC to include altering information in the FISA warrant applications

The most important part of the IG report corroborated the existence of a covert resistance movement within the FBI, and criminal misconduct where an FBI lawyer in the first FISA application altered the contents to deceive the FISA court that the target of their investigation Carter Page was a Russian asset when the fact was Page had been an asset of the IC assisting them on collecting information on the Russians, and the IG investigators discovered text messages showing animas toward trump, one in particular expressed favor towards Hillary and said “Viva le resistance” in weeks after Trump victory. The statements by those interviewed by the DOJ/IG involved saying they didn’t know that the dossier information contradicts the information in the IG notes that the FBI knew the information in the Steele dossier was Russian disinformation is in it by itself evidence of intent to mislead and a conspiracy to obstruct the Trump Presidency.

Sham FBI Investigation of Hillary Clinton and Cover up of President Obama and Clinton communicating over unclassified systems exposing Classified Information to Foreign adversaries.

From January 21, 2009 – February 1, 2013, Hillary Clinton served as the Secretary of State under President Obama. Clinton along with members on her staff Cheryl Mills and Huma Abidin signed Non-Disclosure Agreements which acknowledged they understood the security guidelines in protecting Classified and Sensitive Information and the legal consequences for failing to do so.

[Note: All U.S. government employees, contract employees and those in appointed positions along with their aides whose positions require handling of Classified Information are required to sign a SF-312 Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement with the United States government which acknowledge that they received security indoctrination on the handling of classified information of which states I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of classified information by me could cause damage or irreparable injury to the United States or could be used to advantage by a foreign nation. I have been advised that any unauthorized disclosure of classified information by me may constitute a violation, or violations, of United States criminal laws, including the provisions of sections 641, 793, 794, 798, *952 and 1924, title 18, United States Code; *the provisions of section 783(b}, title 50, United States Code; and the provisions of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982. I recognize that nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the United States of the right to prosecute me for any statutory violation.]

[Note: Fact Hillary Clinton being the Secretary of State had the classification authority to classify or declassify documents, she failed to do by operating a private email server for four years while conducting official government business. When she assumed the office of Secretary of State, Clinton and her aides were required to receive a classification briefing on the handling of classified information and by signing a Standard Form 312, which specifically notes that the laws apply to both marked and unmarked classified material acknowledges they understood the legal consequences of failing to do so. The FBI during her interview never questioned her and failed to showed her signed SF 312 which goes directly to her knowledge of the legal consequences of handling classified information. The mere fact she knowingly conducted official government business over an unsecure private email server while Secretary of State without authorization is evidence in and by itself of her intent to violate the law.]

Undisputed Investigative Facts determined from the FBI criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton and the IG investigation of Clinton email server:

The FBI began investigating the Clinton email scandal in the spring of 2015, when The New York Times revealed Clinton’s use of a private email address for her official governmental work and the fact that she did not preserve the emails on State Department servers, contrary to federal law.

Secretary Clinton after being sworn in as Secretary of State in January 21, 2009, improperly set up a private non-secure system for email communications. It featured her own server, stored in her New York residence and after leaving office in February 1, 2013, the system was maintained by a private contractor in Denver, Colorado.

Clinton operated this private email system without authorization in conducting official State Department communications while Secretary of State and failed to retain said records.

State Department records shows Hillary Clinton was offered to use the State Department secured email system that had been set for her to protect classified information but Clinton declined.

In her FBI interview Clinton told the FBI that she directed her aides in or around January 2009, to create Clintonemail.com account as a matter of convenience and moved to an email system maintained by President Clinton aides in the basement of Clinton Chappaqua, New York address. Clinton’s claim that she “lost” 13 Blackberry devices and did not understand that documents marked “C” meant confidential. Yet the FBI during the interview she was never confronted with her signed non-disclosure agreement on the handling of classified information after she told the agents she did not understand that documents marked “C” meant confidential. [Note: Peter Strzok was one of the FBI agents conducting the interview of Hillary Clinton.]

On March 26, 2020, Judicial Watch recently received FBI records showing that Clinton apologized to the FBI over her email abuses, but that apology was not in the FBI 302 report documenting her interview.

Purportedly Ms. Clinton apologized for her conduct of mishandling Classified information that never made it on the FBI 302 Interview record document.]

Clinton, her aides and other State Department officials transmitted CI from secured CI systems to Hillary Clinton private unsecured mail account which was stored on her non-secure system.

FBI Director Comey stated some 110 emails were classified when they were transmitted and received via Clinton’s personal email server.

FBI Director Comey said there was no electronic connection between the government’s classified systems and Clinton’s unclassified server and that on 110 separate occasions Clinton and/or one of her correspondents had to have retyped – or copied and pasted – information from a classified format; there is no other method to transfer data.

FBI said they did find that hostile foreign actors had successfully gained access to personal email accounts of individuals with whom Clinton was in regular contact with and in doing so obtained emails sent to or received by Clinton on her personal account.

The FBI found that President Obama was using a pseudonymous email account and had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account. This was confirmed in the DOJ/IG report on the FBI handling of Hillary Clinton email investigation “FBI analysts and Prosecutor 2 told the IG that former President Barack Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Clinton had direct contact using her clintonemail.com account,” the report says in a footnote on page 89 of the IG report. “Obama, like other high-level government officials, used a pseudonym for his username on his official government email account,” and that Clinton emailed President Obama directly according to the IG report, from the territory of a foreign adversary.

Ms. Abedin told the FBI that the White House was notified when Mrs. Clinton changed her email address so the President’s secure server wouldn’t exclude her emails.

The Inspector General for the Intelligence Community stated some of the documents were marked at the highest levels, including one about North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. At least 47 of the Clinton emails released contain the Freedom of Information Act release exemption B3 CIA PERS/ORG, which indicates the material referred to CIA personnel matters. Some emails show semi-oblique references to CIA staffers, known as “talk arounds,” to avoid mentioning a name or position per se.

U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) determined that 81 email chains were transmitted and stored on Clinton’s unclassified personal server system, contained classified information ranging from confidential to top secret/special access program levels at the time they were sent between 2009 and 2013. USIC determined that 68 of these emails’ chains remain classified. In addition, the classification process administered by Department of State in connection with FOIA litigation identified approximately 2,000currently classified confidential and 1 email classified secret which the FBI determined were transmitted and stored on at least two of Clinton’ personal server systems.

Clinton also told the FBI that it was “common knowledge” that she used a private email account. Clinton admitted she was not tech savvy, assumed that her email address — hdr22@clintonemail.com — was displayed in the “from” field when she sent emails. But the FBI says that that was not the case. The FBI said “e-mails from Clinton only contained the letter ‘H’ in the sender field and did not display her e-mail address.” Only 13 people emailed her directly, and the “majority” of State employees interviewed by the FBI did not know she had a private server.

Clinton claimed she turned over all work-related emails yet the FBI found emails found in others’ inboxes, messages not turned over by Clinton to the State Department, were work-related.

March 4, 2015, posted on the Wiki Leaks site is an email from John Podesta to Cherly Mills.

From: john.podesta@gmail.com To: cheryl.mills@gmail.com Date: 2015-03-04 20:41 Subject: Special Category

Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seem like they will.

On March 4, the New York Times broke the news about Clinton’s email practices at the State Department, John Podesta (a top Obama adviser and Clinton’s campaign chairman) emailed Cheryl Mills (Clinton’s confidant and top aide in the Obama State Department) to suggest that Clinton’s “emails to and from potus” should be “held” — i.e., not disclosed — because “that’s the heart of his exec privilege.”

March 7, 2015, President Obama was interviewed by CBS news Senior White House correspondent Bill Plante after the publication of a New York Times article.

Plante asked President Obama when he learned about her private email system after his Saturday appearance in Selma, Alabama. President Obama stated, “The same time everybody else learned it through news reports,” “The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency, which is why my emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived,” Mr. Obama said. “I’m glad that Hillary’s instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed.”. “Let me just say that Hillary Clinton is and has been an outstanding public servant. She was a great secretary of state for me,” Mr. Obama said.

Plante asked President Obama about the New York Times article and the House Select Committee in charge of investigating the 2012 Benghazi attacks issued a subpoena of Clinton’s private emails. Clinton herself took to Twitter late Wednesday in her first public statement regarding the clintonemail.com server controversy.

“I want the public to see my email. I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible,” the likely Democratic presidential candidate tweeted.

President Obama responded “I think that the fact that she is putting them forward will allow us to make sure that people have the information they need,” Mr. Obama said.

Right after the interview aired, Clinton campaign secretary Josh Scherwin emailed Jennifer Palmieri and other senior campaign staffers, stating: “Jen you probably have more on this but it looks like POTUS just said he found out HRC was using her personal email when he saw it on the news.”

Scherwin’s alert was forwarded to Mills. Shortly afterwards, an agitated Mills emailed Podesta: “We need to clean this up — he has emails from her — they do not say state.gov.” (That is, Obama had emails from Clinton, which he had to know were from a private account since her address did not end in “@state.gov” as State Department emails do.)

On April 10, 2016, President Obama in an interview with Fox news Chris Wallace, President Obama publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security. The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated.

President Obama said Sunday that Hillary Clinton showed “carelessness” by using a private email server, but he also strongly defended his former secretary of state, saying she did not endanger national security, while also vowing that an ongoing FBI investigation into the matter will not be tainted by politics.

“She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy,” he said. “What I also know is that there’s classified and then there’s classified. There’s stuff that is really top-secret top secret, and then there’s stuff that is being presented to the president, the secretary of state, you may not want going out over the wire.”

“I continue to believe she has not jeopardized America’s national security,” the president said. “There’s a carelessness in terms of managing emails that she has owned and she recognizes. But I also think it is important to keep this in perspective.”

[Note: In his April 10, 2016, comments, Obama made the obvious explicit: President Obama knew at the time that he had communicated with Clinton over her non-secure, private communications system, using an alias. It would not have been possible to prosecute Mrs. Clinton for mishandling classified information without its being clear that President Obama had engaged in the same conduct. Explains why the DOJ and FBI conducted a sham investigation for President Obama was never, ever going to allow Clinton to be prosecuted. More significantly, for Clinton’s defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton’s conduct yet faced no criminal charges. That is why such an indictment of Hillary Clinton was never going to happen. Yet in the Mueller report in volume two the Prosecutors tried to frame President Trump for Obstruction by President Trump comment to Director Comey asking him to take it easy on General Flynn but ignore President Obama comments regarding Clinton intent.]

On May 4, 2016—after then-Director Comey began drafting his July 5 statement clearing Secretary Clinton—Ms. Page and Mr. Strzok communicated about “pressure” building to finish the FBI’s investigation following candidate Trump’s likely nomination:

Ms. Page: And holy shit Cruz just dropped out of the race. It’s going to be a Clinton Trump race. Unbelievable.

Mr. Strzok: What?!?!??

Ms. Page: You heard it right my friend.

Mr. Strzok: I saw trump [sic] won, figured it would be a bit

Mr. Strzok: Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE….

Ms. Page: It sure does. We need to talk about follow up call tomorrow. We still never have.

[Note: The reference to the “MYE” by Mr. Strzok refers to the “midyear exam,” the FBI’s case name for the Clinton investigation.

In addition, Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page discussed the drafting of Director Comey’s July 5 statement exonerating Secretary Clinton.]

May 16, 2016 article in the Washington Post, The Post explained that, according to its sources inside the investigation, there was “scant evidence tying Clinton to criminal wrongdoing” because there was “scant evidence that Clinton had malicious intent in he Obama Justice Department was leaking to the Washington Post that Clinton probably would not be charged – and that her top aide, Cheryl Mills, was considered a cooperating witness rather than a coconspirator.

On June 30, 2016, FBI personnel circulated a draft of Director Comey’s statement that noted that Secretary Clinton had emailed with President Obama from the private server while abroad in the “territory of sophisticated adversaries.” The passage read:

We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries. That use included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the territory of such an adversary. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account. The same afternoon, after FBI officials edited the draft to replace “the President” with “another senior government official,” Mr. Strzok sent a text message to Ms. Page notifying her of the change. The exchange read:

Mr. Strzok: K. Rybicki just sent another version.

Ms. Page: Bill just popped his head in, hopefully to talk to him.

Mr. Strzok: Hope so. Just left Bill. Talked about the speech, the [redacted] stuff relating to the case, and what I told you about earlier.

Mr. Strzok: He changed President to “another senior government official.”

Director Comey’s statement as ultimately delivered on July 5 omitted a reference to either President Obama or “another senior government official.”

On July 1, 2016, amid intense public criticism of her meeting with Bill Clinton, Attorney General Lynch piously announced that she would accept whatever recommendation the FBI director and career prosecutors made about charging Clinton.

On July 1, 2016—the same day as Attorney General Lynch’s announcement, but before the FBI had interviewed Secretary Clinton and before Director Comey had announced his recommendation—Ms. Page and Mr. Strzok exchanged the following messages:

Mr. Strzok: Holy cow…. nyt breaking Apuzzo, Lync [sic] will accept whatever rec D and career prosecutors make. No political appointee input.

Mr. Strzok: Lynch. Timing not great, but whatever. Wonder if that’s why the no coordination language added.

Ms. Page: No way. This is a purposeful leak following the airplane snafu.

Mr. Strzok: Timing looks like hell. Will appear to be choreographed. All major news networks literally leading with “AG to accept FBI D’s recommendation.”

Ms. Page: Yeah, that is awful timing. Nothing we can do about it.

Mr. Strzok: What I meant was, did DOJ tell us yesterday they were doing this, so D added that language.

Mr. Strzok: Yep. I told Bill the same thing. Delaying just makes it worse.

Ms. Page: And yes. I think we had some warning of it. I know they sent some statement to rybicki, bc he called andy.

Ms. Page: And yeah, it’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.

[Note: Fearing this just might look a bit choreographed, the FBI promptly amended Comey’s planned remarks to include this assertion (which he in fact made on July 5): “I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.”]

On July 2, 2016, with the decision that she would not be indicted, Mrs. Clinton sat for an interview with the FBI. The FBI permitted two subjects of the investigation, Mills and Clinton aide Heather Samuelson to sit in on the interview as lawyers representing Clinton. [Note: This is unheard of in a criminal investigation having two co-conspirators involved with Clinton in the mishandling of Classified information sit in on the FBI interview of the target of the FBI investigation, Hillary Clinton.]

On July 5, 2016, FBI director James Comey publicly stated that Clinton had been “extremely careless” in using a private email server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the relevant criminal statute). The director acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, it was just a small percentage of the emails involved.

July 8, 2016, Clinton appears on CNN and in the interview rebuts the FBI charges she was reckless, she stated she communicated with over 300 people with via email including longtime diplomats and government officials, constructing the false premise that these diplomats and officials would not have never sent her information that was classified knowing she was communicating the fact that they did not know that the Clinton was using

Her comments in and of itself of her continue campaign in deceiving voters and the public in obfuscating the facts of her reckless conduct of as Secretary of State as exposing Classified information

On January 19, 2018, the Department of Justice produced 384 pages of text messages exchanged between FBI employees Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. According to a cover letter accompanying the documents, the FBI did not preserve text messages between Ms. Page and Mr. Strzok between approximately December 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017. The cover letter explained:

The Department wants to bring to your attention that the FBI’s technical system for retaining text messages sent and received on FBI mobile devices failed to preserve text messages for Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page from December 14, 2016 to approximately to May 17, 2017. The FBI has informed [the Department of Justice] that many FBI-provided Samsung 5 mobile devices did not capture or store text messages due to misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities. The result was that data that should have been automatically collected and retained for long-term storage and retrieval was not collected.

On May 10, 2019, Judicial Watch, a conservative advocacy group, obtained emails that show Obama White House officials were aware of a FOIA request submitted to the State Department by liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which was ultimately denied. The FOIA request, filed in December 2012, was rebuffed by the State Department on the grounds that no responsive records existed — a response the State Department described as “inaccurate and incomplete” in an IG 2016 report. The Obama White House made an effort to track a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed in 2012 that sought communications related to then-secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, according to newly released emails. “These documents suggest the Obama White House knew about the Clinton email lies being told to the public at least as early as December 2012,”and the emails, when considered in light of the State Department’s eventual improper response to the FOIA request, suggest a cover up orchestrated by White House officials, according to Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. [Note: The information corroborates the fact that President Obama lied to the public in his March 7, 2015, interview with CBS host Bill Plante. Plante asked President Obama when did he first learn about her (Clinton) private email system wherein President Obama stated, “The same time everybody else learned it through news reports.”]

On March 22, 2020, Judicial watch received partial Strzok timeline was included in Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s June 2018 report on the Clinton email investigation. Also, the report suggested possible bias by Strzok: “[W]e did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.”

In a November 6, 2016, email with the subject line “Request for conference call bridge” Strzok tells senior FBI officials: “[Redacted], Jon and I completed our review of all of the potential HRC work emails on the laptop. We found no previously unknown, potentially classified emails on the media [laptop].”

Reportedly, only 3,077 of the more than 300,000 emails found on the Weiner laptop “were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.”

The emails also include an October 30, 2016, email titled “MYE data update,” in which Strzok tells other top FBI officials: “The discussion of the classified email remains accurate.”

In an October 31, 2016, email thread discussing a New York Times article about the FBI conducting a review of Huma Abedin’s emails found on Weiner’s laptop that Strzok circulated to then-Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Jonathan Moffa, then-Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Bill Priestap, and redacted persons, Moffa says: “I think [redacted],” to which Strzok replies, “Yes. Yes, we did. Makes you wonder who dialed in …” Moffa responds, “Sure does. First reference I’m ever aware of to our review network too.”

August 23, 2018, article in Real Clear investigations, by Paul Sperry titled “Despite Comey assurances, vast bulk of Weiner laptop emails were never examined.”

THE FBI/DOJ COVER UP

The cover up by the FBI is proven by the actions or lack of actions of how the investigation was conducted:

Failure of the FBI personnel assigned to investigate the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton to ask the obvious questions or follow established investigative procedures and violate the law resulted in corrupting the investigative and judicial process by ignoring the numerous criminal violations as the handling of Classified Information, the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and President Obama and others identified in the Inspector General reports of the transmittal of Classified Information, which one could reasonable argue cause irreparable injury to the public trust in the Rule of Law and injury to the United States by exposing Classified information which could be used to advantage by a foreign nation. The FBI by ignoring established investigative procedures in and by itself is evidence of a corrupt motive that the FBI under Director Comey, McCabe and Strzok intent was to exonerate Clinton, not determine whether there was enough evidence to indict her.

Failure of the Attorney General Loretta Lynch DOJ abdicating her prosecutorial oversight responsibility, of and by itself is evidence of systemic corruption on part of a cabal within the FBI and DOJ that looks purposely inept in influencing the 2016 POTUS in favoring Hillary Clinton.

The fact that the investigation of Secretary Clinton was conducted and investigated out of the FBI headquarters in Washington D.C., when the information was discovered by the FBI/NY field division. That the investigation was supervised by Director Comey, Assistant FBI Director McCabe, Supervisory Special Agent Strzok along with other members in the FBI National Security Headquarters Branch. The mere fact that Comey, McCabe and Strzok were also the principals involved in the FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation into President Trump and are identified as three co-conspirators in conducting the false flag operation against President Trump to obstruct his candidacy and after the 2016 Presidential election, to frame President Trump for crimes he didn’t commit.

The most important Fact that the FBI ignored are the National Security implications of President Obama and Hillary Clinton being blackmailed by foreign adversaries. FBI found that President Obama had been communicating via unsecured email using a pseudo name anonymous with Hillary Clinton over her unsecured personal email server which was buried in an agent note in the FBI report.

Fact that Director Comey an member of the executive branch, had no authority to ignore the express language of a statute created by Congress, by adding an element of intent in the criminal statute for criminal negligence and changing the verbiage from gross negligence to Extreme Carelessness for which he based his decision not to charge Clinton because there was no evidence of willful intent to mishandle classified information, by doing so, he acted outside the scope of his authority and was one of the reasons for his firing as FBI Director.

FBI by agreeing to unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her aides by giving immunity not limited to the act of production but extended to the contents of the computer and even included any contents that the lawyers may have destroyed and the FBI failure to use a grand jury for the issuance of subpoenas in a high profile investigation is unprecedented.

FBI granted limited immunity to Mrs. Clinton’s top aides former chief of staff Cheryl Mills and senior adviser Heather Samuelson, in order to get them to surrender their laptops, as part of its probe into whether Mrs. Clinton mishandled classified information. The FBI merely had to seek a subpoena or search warrant. By offering immunity, the FBI exempted the laptops and their emails as potential evidence in a criminal case. Beth Wilkinson, who represented Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson, says the immunity deals were designed to protect her clients against any related “classification” disputes. This is an admission that both women knew their unsecure laptops had been holding sensitive information.

FBI director Comey also allowed Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson to serve as lawyers for Mrs. Clinton at her FBI interview despite having been interviewed as witnesses and offered immunity.

The FBI offered immunity to John Bentel, who directed the State Department’s Office of Information Resources Management; to Bryan Pagliano, Mrs. Clinton’s IT guru; and to an employee of Platte River Networks (PRN), which housed the Clinton server.

The FBI documents also disclose that Mr. Pagliano admitted to having, at the beginning of Mrs. Clinton’s tenure, several conversations with unnamed State Department official(s) who expressed concern that her private server posed “a federal records retention issue,” and that it was likely transmitting classified information. When Mr. Pagliano relayed these concerns to Ms. Mills, she ignored them.

The FBI deliberately ignored and failed to properly follow standard investigative guidelines in investigating the destruction of evidence, of 33,000 of Hillary Clinton emails and obstruction of justice/destruction of evidence after issuance of a congressional subpoena wherein 15 days after receiving said subpoena Hillary Clinton private email server was bleach bit and her 13 communication devices were smashed with a hammer and destroyed.

During Clinton four- hour FBI interview she was never confronted with her signed non-disclosure agreement on the handling of classified information after she told the agents she did not understand that documents marked “C” meant confidential.

The fact that the original senior FBI agent in charge John Giacalone of the Hillary Clinton investigation and Chief of the FBI National Security Branch resigned from the case and retired from the FBI because he felt the case was going sideways. That Andrew McCabe was Giacalone successor. In 2015, McCabe wife received $675,000 in lawful campaign funds from than Governor of Virginia Terry McAuliffe, a close friend of Hillary and Bill Clinton for a failed Virginia State Senate seat. Director Comey or McCabe said they didn’t think there was a conflict of interest.

The FBI never did forensics on the DNC server because the DNC refused the FBI request to examine the server to determine if there was Russian hacking. Instead the FBI accepted the findings by Crowd Strike that the server had been hacked by the Russians
In December 2916, Inspector General Horowitz found that the FBI had included “at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications and many errors in the Woods Procedures” during its Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
On March 31, 2020, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz wrote FBI Director Chris Wray in a management alert memo that a review of more than two dozen Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant cases found agents were not complying with the so-called Woods Procedures designed to protect American civil liberties during such probes.

Among the problems cited was a failure by agents to substantiate allegations submitted to courts, similar to the missteps the FBI made in failing to ensure allegations in the Steele dossier back in 2016 were verified before securing a FISA warrant targeting the Trump campaign and former adviser Carter Page. The report found that investigators:

could not review original Woods Files for four of the 29 selected FISA applications because the FBI has not been able to locate them and, in 3 of these instances, did not know if they ever existed;
identified apparent errors or inadequately supported facts in all of the 25 applications we reviewed;
identified deficiencies in documentary support and application accuracy;

interviewed FBI officials who indicated to us that there were no efforts by the FBI to use existing FBI and National Security Division oversight mechanisms to perform comprehensive, strategic assessments of the efficacy of the Woods Procedures or FISA accuracy.

April 24, 2020, article in the Washington Examiner by Caitlin Yilek titled “Former top FBI worried Hillary Clinton would be indicted after winning the election.” Yilek referenced author David Rohde interview of former FBI legal Counsel James Baker, Rohde wrote a book titled “In Deep, The FBI. The CIA and the Truth about America Deep State,” excerpts from the book of the interview, Baker said “he felt like the fates had thrown him a curve ball where he was informed that FBI agents had found 600,000 to one million emails on disgraced former Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner’s lap top relating to Clinton.” Baker “believed it was likely that the FBI could find new evidence of wrongdoing by Clinton. She wins the election, we go to DOJ and recommend that they indict her before she becomes President, Baker said describing his nightmare scenario: That not a good place for the FBI, Baker also worried that the bureau creditability would be damaged if Comey did not inform Congress. Baker said Comey agreed and two weeks before the election Comey notified congress and reopen the case 11 days before an election only to close it again days before voters went to the polls. [What is stunning about Baker’s comments is he realizes there a legal issue for the FBI with the discovery of thousands of new Clinton emails found on the computer of Weiner that may be classified or not. The FBI does their due diligence and notify Congress of the issue involving a Candidate for the office of the Presidency. However instead of following the law and allowing the investigative process to determine the facts whether Clinton or for that matter Abiden broke any laws the FBI closes the case and deceives the public that they looked at all the emails and found no evidence of them being classified. Baker knows if the FBI did through analysis that the probability of finding classified or government work related emails would be found. Instead the FBI did a sham investigation by reopening an investigation 11 days before an election to give the appearance they were actually investigating the matter, when in reality they weren’t. By closing the case a few days later and telling the public that they looked at all the emails and determined there was no classified documents was disingenuous when there was no way for the FBI to properly exam 600,000 to one million emails give the short time frame from the reopening to the closing of the investigation. What Baker and the FBI didn’t tell the public is how did the emails belonging to Clinton get on Weiner’s lap top in the first place. By exonerating Clinton, a second time didn’t do Ms. Clinton nor the FBI reputation any favors as she blames the FBI for reopening the case as the reason why she lost the election but more importantly exposed the double standard of how justice was determined under the Obama Justice system. Just ask yourself this, if they had found 600,000 to one million government emails belonging to you on the lap top of a sexual predator do you think the FBI would open and closed a case without interviewing the person whom emails belonged to, think not.]

[Note: One could conclude from the actions or non-actions by the FBI in both email investigations, the goal of the FBI under Director Comey, McCabe and Strzok was to exonerate Clinton, not determine whether there was enough evidence to indict her. The fact of the FBI opening up a criminal investigation on Donald Trump and members in his campaign after the interview of Hillary Clinton and the FBI continued pattern of failure to follow investigative procedures is and by itself evidence of a false flag conspiracy operation against President Trump corruption within the FBI.]

Use of the Russian disinformation Steele Dossier to spy on Trump campaign officials and sabotage President Trump Presidency

[Note: Versions of the Steel dossier were circulated by Steele and others co-conspirators to various U.S. agencies and U.S. politicians who contacted the FBI. By using circulating reporting coming from different sources within the government gave the appearance that the information was creditable. Since the CIA and FBI knew that Russian disinformation was used in the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment and that the information for the Steele dossier came from Russian Intelligence calls into to question what was the legal justification for appointing a Special Counsel to investigative President Trump. Its calls into question the integrity of the whole Mueller report and why Mueller and his team would opened an investigation based upon bad faith and investigated President Trump for two years in reaching a conclusion that they knew the answer to that they could not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. What’s troubling is the Prosecutors on the Mueller investigation were allowed to reworded the definition of obstruction to give the appearance that President Trump committed a crime of obstruction of justice is in itself evidence of a governmental corruption by the DOJ Special Counsel Office.[Note: If you applied the same legal standard used by the Mueller team to President Obama actions regarding Hillary Clinton, Obama actions actually meet the definition of obstruction of justice in influencing the FBI not to indict Hillary Clinton.]

April 2016, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) commissioned the Steele dossier which was funded through Clinton law firm Perkins Coie and a lawyer representing the DNC named Marc C. Elias. The firm received between 9.2-12,4 million dollars in legal and consulting fees of which 1.02 million was paid to Fusion GPS and its founder Glen Simpson for opposition research on Donald Trump, his family, businesses and associations. Simpson hired Nellie Ohr and ex-British M16 spy Christopher Steele to gather opposition research on Candidate Trump. GPS became the tip of the spear in promoting the Steele dossier to the public as part of the Obama administration and media disinformation campaign against Donald Trump.

In October 2015, Simpson hires Nellie Ohr, wife of DOJ Attorney Bruce Ohr to compile opposition research on Trump, his family, his aides, and Trump business ties to Russian and other former eastern bloc countries. Bruce Ohr had known Steele since 2007, years when he worked in the U.S. Office in New York. Simpson and Bruce Ohr met in 2010.

In January 2016, Steele notifies Bruce Ohr about lobbying on behalf of a Russian government linked aluminum magnate Oleg Deripaska in seeking a US visa and reports to Ohr alleging Trump has ties to the Kremlin.

September 2016, Nellie Ohr complies a spreadsheet whosWho19Sept2016 from November 2015-september 2016 of GPS research trump-Russian linkage citing three protodossiers produced by Ohr in May 2016. Nellie Ohr gave a copy of the research to her husband Bruce Ohr who gave the research information to the FBI.

In January 2016, Steele notifies Bruce Ohr about lobbying on behalf of a Russian government linked aluminum magnate Oleg Deripaska in seeking a US visa and reports to Ohr alleging Trump has ties to the Kremlin.

July 5, 2016, Steele gave FBI Rome County Attaché Michael Gaeta, a copy of the dossier during their meeting in London, England and Steele told Gaeta Trump was in Putin pocket. [Note: Same day Director Comey announces the results to the public of the FBI investigation of Clinton unsecure email server wherein Comey declines to charge Hillary Clinton.]

July 30, 2016, Steele meets with Bruce and Nellie Ohr in Washington, D.C. to discuss the dossier contents and Steele tells the Ohrs that Trump was in Putin pocket. [Note: Steele and Bruce Ohr were long time acquaintances, and Nellie Ohr worked as a Fusion GPS contractor on the Clinton campaign’s opposition research project on Donald Trump hired by the owner of Fusion GPS Glen Simpson.]

July 30, 2016, after this meeting Bruce Ohr calls FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to pass on Steele claim that Trump was in Putin Pocket. [NOTE Ohr knew McCabe from their days investigating organized crime in New York.]

December 9, 2019 report by Department of Justice (Department) Inspector General Michael Horowitz findings of facts listed as redacted foot notes in the report and unclassified by AG Barr and Acting National Intelligence Director Richard Grenell.

The Evidence shows early as July 2016, the Russians knew that Steele was assisting the FBI in their investigation into Trump and his campaign and that the FBI was repeatedly warned that Steele was susceptible to Russian disinformation and that U.S. Intelligence concluded some of Steele’ Hillary Clinton funded dossier’s claims about Trump was false information planted by Russian Intelligence Service.

The footnote states that an FBI intelligence analyst and a supervisory special agent working on the Crossfire Hurricane probe admitted they “did not recall reviewing information in Steele’s Delta file documenting Steele’s frequent contacts with representatives for multiple Russian oligarchs in 2015.”

“In addition to the information in Steele’s Delta file documenting Steele’s frequent contacts with representatives for multiple Russian oligarch, we identified reporting the Crossfire Hurricane team received [redacted] indicating the potential for Russia disinformation influencing Steele’s election reporting,” a second footnote revealed.

Specifically, that footnote added: “A [redacted] 2017 report relayed information from [redacted] outlining an inaccuracy in a limited subset of Steele’s reporting about the activities of (former Trump lawyer) Michael Cohen. The [redacted] stated that it did not have high confidence in this subset of Steele’s reporting and assessed that the referenced subset was part of a Russian disinformation campaign to denigrate U.S. foreign relations.”

That same footnote reveals a separate report to the FBI, dated 2017, “contained information … that the public reporting about the details of Trump’s [REDACTED] activities in Moscow during a trip in 2013 were false, and that they were the product of RIS ‘infiltra[ing] a source into the network’ of a [REDACTED] who compiled a dossier of information on Trump’s activities.” RIS is an acronym for Russian intelligence services.

By 2017, the FBI was warned specific false information in Steele’s dossier was planted by Russian intelligence, according to the declassified notes that became public from Michael Horowitz’s report.

Senior Justice Department official Bruce Ohr warned the FBI in August 2016 that Steele held an extreme bias against Trump (he was “desperate” to defeat Trump) and that his information was likely uncorroborated raw intelligence.

Steele’s work on the dossier was funded by Trump’s rival in the election, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and the Democratic Party, through their opposition research firm, Fusion GPS. Ohr warned the FBI in August 2016 that Steele’s work was connected to the Clinton campaign in some way.

Steele told a State Department official in October 2016, 10 days before the FISA warrants were first secured, that he had leaked to the news media and had an election day deadline for making public the information he had shared with the FBI as a confidential human source.

Steele was fired Nov. 1, 2016 for violating his confidential human source agreement by leaking to the news media.

Information Steele provided to the government was proven, before the FISA warrants were granted, to be false and inaccurate. Specifically, he told State official Kathleen Kavalec in early October 2016 that he believed Russia was funding its hacking operations through its consulate in Miami. The Russians did not have a consulate in Miami, Kavalec reported in her notes.

Steele was caught in October 2016 peddling a false internet rumor also being spread by a lawyer for the Democratic National Committee and a liberal reporter. That rumor claimed Trump and Putin might be communicating through mysterious computer pings at a server tied to Russia’s Alfa Bank. The rumor was dismissed by the FBI as false.

The FBI falsely declared to the FISA court it had corroborated the evidence in Steele’s dossier used in the search warrant application, including that Carter Page had met with two senior Russians in Moscow in summer 2016. In fact, the Page meetings were never corroborated and a spreadsheet that reviewed every statement in the Steele dossier found were either inaccurate, uncorroborated or information easily found on the Internet.

Recently released classified information from DOJ/IG report by the AG showed that the FBI in the first FISA application in building a narrative for the court alleging Russian collusion between the Trump Campaign and the Russians, used information from a July 26 media article “claiming that Trump’s campaign worked behind the scenes to make sure the GOP platform would not call for giving weapons to the Ukraine to fight Russian and rebel forces.

Recently released classified information from the DOJ/IG that State Department officials and close associates of Hillary Clinton and an advisor to late Senator McCain were providing information to the FBI purporting that Carter Page was a Russian Agent that was used by the FBI as verification information in the FISA warrant to deceive the court. This information from the DOJ/IG exposes the efforts by Obama administration State Department officials, Jonathan Winer, John Finer and Victoria Nuland and friends of Hillary Clinton, Sidney Blumenthal and Cody Shearer and long-time advisor to the late Senator John McCain David Kramer of spreading the Steele dossier of Russian disinformation narrative of Trump-Russian collusion. FBI document documented that Victoria Nuland was in communication with Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson. Kramer told the FBI he met with two Obama officials to inquire about the Steele dossier to asked them was it being taken seriously. Kramer told the FBI that McCain in early December 2016, asked him to meet with Victoria Nuland about the Steele dossier wherein Kramer said he met Nuland on December 13, 2016 and discussed the dossier and obtained a copy. McCain passed the copy of the Steele dossier to the FBI.

An article published in the New Yorkers dated March 5, 2018, by Jane Mayer titled “Christopher Steele, the man behind the Trump dossier, How the ex-spy tried to warn the world about Trump’s ties to Russia.” John Sipher a retired CIA analyst told Mayer that the information in the Steele dossier was source material, not expert opinion but that the information was generally creditable based upon Sipher opinion without offering any evidence of fact to back up his opinion why the information was creditable.

In Mayer’s 2018, New Yorker article she reported that John Finer Chief of State for Secretary of State John Kerry briefed Secretary Kerry on the contents of a two-page summary of the Steele dossier that Finer said he received the two- page document from an Obama State Department official Jonathan Winer.

In the Mayer’s 2018, article she referenced to Simpson’s Senate testimony who told the committee that in June 2016 that Steele alerted Simpson of the dossier and told Simpson he wanted to alert the U.S. government. [Note: The statement of Simpson in his Senate testimony contradicts with the known facts that Neile Ohr was hired by GPS Fusion Simpson in October 2015 to collect information on Trump, his family and associates dealings with Russia and Eastern bloc countries; that in December 2016, Steele met with Bruce Ohr who worked at DOJ in a high level position wherein Steele told Ohr about Trump’s alleged ties to the Kremlin. Steele told Mayer’s that Simpson called him in spring of 2016 asking for his assistance in following up leads on Trump ties to the Kremlin, that GPS was having difficulties in following up on.]

Winer, former Obama officials in the State Department wrote and Op-Ed piece date February 8, 2018. for the Washington Post titled “Devin Nunes is investigating me. Here’s the truth,” My Role in the Trump dossier.” admitted while working at the State Department he exchanged documents and information with Steele and shared the Steele anti-Trump documents he had received with his old friend Sidney Blumenthal who had received the Steele dossier from Cody Shearer.

The FBI interviewed Steele’s primary sub-source in January 2017, who claimed much of the information attributed to him was not accurate, exaggerated or rumor.

The FBI possessed statements of innocence from Page collected by an undercover informer in August and October 2016, including that Page denied meeting with the two Russians and did not play a role in changing a GOP platform position on Ukraine during the Trump nominating convention. The statements undercut two primary allegations made by the FBI in their applications in seeking the FISA warrants.

The CIA alerted the FBI that Page was a friendly U.S. asset who had assisted the Agency on Russia matters and was not a stooge for the Russian government. The FBI altered a document to hide this revelation.

The FBI possessed exculpatory statements made by Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos in which he told an undercover informer that he and the Trump campaign were not involved in the Russian hacking of Clinton’s emails and considered such activity to be “illegal.” The FBI originally opened the probe of Trump campaign on suspicion Papadopoulos was somehow involved or had knowledge of the hacking of Clinton’s emails.

The FBI concluded in January 2017 that Trump national security adviser Mike Flynn was not being deceptive in his interviews with agents and likely suffered from a faulty memory and was not operating as an agent for Russia.

March 17-18, 2020, during a civil law suit deposition in a British Court Steele was crossed examined by Hugh Tomlinson, a lawyer for Petr Aven, German Khan, and Mikhail Fridman, the owners of Alfa Bank, Russian Bankers who were suing Steele for defamation over a memo in the dossier that accused them of making illicit payments to Vladimir Putin. Steele testified that he no longer has documents and other information from his meetings with the main source for his Trump dossier.

Steele also told the court that his communications regarding the dossier, including with Fusion GPS, were “wiped” in December 2016 and January 2017, the court transcript shows.

[Note: Steele testimony conflicts with his prior public statement in December 10, 2019, wherein Steele said he had evidence that would shed light on what his main dossier source told him back in 2016, when Steele was working for the firm Fusion GPS to investigate the Trump campaign that he ‘meticulously documented and recorded’ his meetings with the source. Steele’s statement was a response to the DOJ/IG report released the day before that said that Steele’s source dubbed the “Primary Sub-Source” told the FBI in January 2017 that Steele misrepresented or embellished information in the dossier which undermined the information in the dossier. In a rebuttal to the DOJ/IG, Steele’s lawyers disputed what the dossier source purportedly told the FBI, and said that the source’s debriefings to Steele “were meticulously documented and recorded,” and asserted that if Steele had been given a chance to respond to the IG report, “the statements by the ‘Primary Sub-Source’ would be put in a different light.”]

Deceiving the American Public, the Obama administration and Media disinformation campaign against President Trump

The facts determined that the Obama administration and the media were conducting a massive disinformation campaign by Steele and Obama administration officials leaking information from the Steele dossier and classified information to the media whose were circulating the false information in an organized media effort to promote the Trump-Russian collusion hoax narrative in deceiving the American public which in and by itself is evidence of a false flag conspiracy to sabotage the Trump Presidential campaign and Presidency.
The most incriminating admission that the Obama administration was stage-managing a disinformation media campaign against President Trump using selected media outlets was the interview of Senior Obama advisor Ben Rhodes in the May 2016, New Yorker magazine article wherein Rhodes explained the Obama administration relationship with the media and spoke candidly about how he and the Obama administration had manipulated the media and used them to disseminate their talking points.

[Note: Steele and the conspirators were using the time tested intelligence method known as circular reporting which is circulating disinformation on the target of their disinformation campaign to witting or unwitting media sources, and other sources such as politicians and government officials who repeat the same information giving the information the appearance that the information is creditable because it came from different sources to hide the fact that the information came from one source.]

The fact that U.S. law enforcement and Intelligence sources told CNN in February 2017, that some of the information in the Steele dossier was corroborated by Intelligence intercept communications on Russian officials giving the appearance of creditability to the public that the allegations in the dossier of Trump Russian had merit when our Intelligence agencies knew that Russian Intelligence were the originators of the information in the Steele dossier and fed Steele the disinformation on Trump, was highly likely the Russians would have had conversations talking about the information provided to Steele knowing that the conversations were being intercepted by U.S. Intelligence to lend creditability and convince U.S. Intelligence that the information in the Steele dossier was creditable is in and by itself evidence of a false flag operation. Intercepted conversation of foreign officials and adversaries is common practice commonly used by Intelligence agencies throughout the history of spy craft and also used by Intelligence agencies to spread disinformation.

March 22, 2020, Judicial Watch stated it has received 180 pages of records of communications between former FBI official Peter Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa Page. Judicial Watch also received productions of 171 pages and 119 pages of Strzok-Page emails showing the FBI actively pushed stories to the media to stoke its claim that the bureau was “highly confident” Russia was “behind recent hacks.” One email shows Strzok telling Page about an appearance on CNN by then-Assistant Attorney General for National Security John Carlin: “On CNN now talking about hacking of state election systems. NICE coordination NSD….”

The new emails also show Strzok, Page and other high-ranking FBI officials discussing the “alleged destruction of laptops;” a lengthy discussion about how to respond to a reporter’s inquiry into an alleged quid pro quo related to Hillary Clinton’s emails in which the State Department would create additional FBI overseas positions; and Strzok defending Director James Comey after a former FBI official said Comey had “thrown all the agents under the bus.” And the documents further confirm that Strzok pushed Russia smears of Trump laundered through the media within the FBI. No wonder the FBI is slow rolling the release of these documents.”

October 31, 2016, email thread discussing a New York Times article about the FBI conducting a review of Huma Abedin’s emails found on Weiner’s laptop that Strzok circulated to then-Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Jonathan Moffa, then-Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Bill Priestap, and redacted persons, Moffa says: “I think [redacted],” to which Strzok replies, “Yes. Yes we did. Makes you wonder who dialed in …” Moffa responds, “Sure does. First reference I’m ever aware of to our review network too.”

On November 1, 2016, a redacted official in the Director’s Office emails Strzok, Page and other redacted persons with a “Media question,” asking, “Politico asks why all of Huma’s electronic devices she may have used were not subpoenaed early on. Could you please provide any guidance on how I should respond? [Redacted]. Thank you.” Strzok replies, “Hi [redacted].”

On October 31, 2016, Strzok forwarded to Page a Mother Jones article titled “A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump,” concerning the allegations by a “former senior intelligence officer for a Western country who specialized in Russian counterintelligence” that the Russian government “has for years tried to co-opt and assist Trump.”

On October 31, 2016, Strzok forwarded to Priestap, Moffa, Page and unidentified persons an NBC News article titled, “FBI Making Inquiry into Ex-Trump Campaign Manager’s Foreign Ties,” about an FBI investigation of Paul Manafort, with Strzok saying, “Wow, busy news night. Talked with [redacted] earlier, he said [Washington Post reporter] Ellen Nakashima had mentioned below to him.” An unidentified General Counsel office official then responds, “FYI – Slate has an article on the Trump server.” [Note: The Slate article that alleged that Trump’s campaign set up a covert communication system with Russia during the 2016 election using a computer server in the United States and another owned by a Russian bank has been widely debunked.]

On November 14, 2016, New York Times reporter Matt Apuzzo emailed an unidentified FBI official asking, “We got this in the mail today. Any truth to it?” Attached was an “Affidavit for a Criminal Arrest Warrant and Search Warrants,” purporting to have been sworn out by an FBI agent and allegedly “charging DONALD JOHN TRUMP with conspiracy to commit espionage …” The FBI official forwarded it to Strzok and other redacted officials, saying, “For your awareness. The NYT provided the attached document to us today in order to verify its authenticity. It is supposedly an affidavit in support of espionage charges against Donald John Trump. They received it in the mail today. They doubt it is an authentic document noting there are numerous inaccuracies. Wanted to provide it for your awareness.” Strzok forwards it to Page, saying, “Told them it was not authentic. [Redacted].”

Judicial Watch also received productions of 171 pages and 119 pages of Strzok-Page emails showing the FBI actively pushed stories to the media to stoke its claim that the bureau was “highly confident” Russia was “behind recent hacks.” One email shows Strzok telling Page about an appearance on CNN by then-Assistant Attorney General for National Security John Carlin: “On CNN now talking about hacking of state election systems. NICE coordination NSD….”

The new emails also show Strzok, Page and other high-ranking FBI officials discussing the “alleged destruction of laptops;” a lengthy discussion about how to respond to a reporter’s inquiry into an alleged quid pro quo related to Hillary Clinton’s emails in which the State Department would create additional FBI overseas positions; and Strzok defending Director James Comey after a former FBI official said Comey had “thrown all the agents under the bus.” “And the documents further confirm that Strzok pushed Russia smears of Trump laundered through the media within the FBI. The most scintillating information Mueller’s team ascribed to Samochornov in the report was a tidbit suggesting a hint of impropriety: The translator admitted he was offered $90,000 by the Russians to pay his legal bills, if he supported the story of Moscow attorney Natalia Veselnitskya. He declined.

But recently released FBI memos show that Samochornov, a translator trusted by the State Department and other federal agencies, provided agents far more information than was quoted by Mueller, nearly all of it exculpatory to the president’s campaign and his eldest son.

“The topic of discussion was the Magnitsky Act and related topics,” Samochornov told the agents, adding that Veselnitskya didn’t even do most of the talking. An American lobbyist provided the presentation, he said.

The translator’s detailed account — omitted from the Mueller report — validated most aspects of Trump Jr.’s original story. And the FBI knew it from the start of the controversy.

The belated release of the FBI interview report under a Freedom of Information Act request is likely to raise serious questions among congressional oversight committees about why the information was suppressed in the Mueller report, why the FBI kept it quiet for two years while Trump Jr. was being politically pilloried, and why the news media has failed to correct its own record of misleading reporting.

“The omission from the Mueller report leaves a distorted picture that has been allowed to persist for more than two years,” a Senate staffer involved in the Russia investigation told me on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t approved to talk to the news media. “We are looking into the circumstances of the editing of that report and why DOJ allowed such investigations and false public narratives to carry on in the face of significant evidence of innocence,” used them to disseminate his talking points.

April-May-June 2016, every major news organization were circulating stories about GOP Presidential candidate Trump to the public about Trump and his associates ties to Russia and other eastern bloc countries from information contained in the four protodossiers produced by GPS Neille Ohr, one of the protodossiers were of trump relationships with Russian organized crime, reporting that Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump had travelled to Moscow with convicted felon Felix Sater of the Bay rock group to explore business deals and Trump saga with Soho, another protodossier dealt with trump campaign manager Paul Manafort business dealing in the Ukraine, a third protodossier reported on Trump connection to eastern bloc counties titled trump in Azerbaijan, Trump in Russia, Trump in Georgia, Trump in Serbia and the last protodossier Donald trump and Russia. GPS had been briefing the press for several months before Steele gave his dossier to the FBI which focus on trump and his associates to Russian government officials and figures close to kremlin leadership wherein Ohr protodossiers were trump alleged connections to Russian and eastern bloc countries with ties to organized crime and Russian state interests is and by itself evidence an organized disinformation campaign by the Obama administration and selected media outlets against President Trump and his campaign to sabotage the 2016 Presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton. [Note: Ironically, the Russian disinformation Steele dossier was paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC.]

April 2016, article published by Politico by former Obama Official Evelyn Farkas, a Russia specialist. Farkas in the article claimed that Trump posed as much of a threat to the West as Putin did. Trump according to Farkas “is seeking to turn the United States into a post-factual society analogous to Putin’s Russia.”

April 5, 2016, article in New York Times by Mike McIntire recounting the Trump SoHo saga featuring Felix Sater and two Kazah businessman, Tevifk Arif and Alexander Maskevich titled “Trump business partners in SoHo.”

April 26, 2016, another article published by Politico by Michael Crowley titled “The Kremlin Candidate,” alleged that the Russian government owned English TV station Russian Television (RT) favored Trump over Clinton. The article mentioned Michael Flynn attending a banquet in December 2015 hosted by RT and sitting next to Vladimir Putin. The article had a quote from an unidentified Senior Obama Official saying, “Its not usually to America benefit when our intelligence officers-current or former-seek refuge in Russia.

April 26, 2016, article in the Washington Post by Steven Mufson and Tom Hamburger into Maniforts business dealings in the Ukraine.

April 27, 2016, article in the Guardian published an identical story of Manifort business dealings in the Ukraine.

April 28, 2016, article in the New York Times MAGAZINE by Jonathan Chait, titled why is Donald trump a pasty for Vladimir Putin. In the article Chait argues that trumps desire to find common ground with Putin signals a clear turn in American policy and concluded that trump is Vladimir Putin stooge.’ Chait linked his article with Crowley and Foer articles.

April 28, 2016, article in Slate by franklin Foer that profiled Manifort on his business with the Ukrainians with special attention to Ukrainian president Yanukovych. Why asked Foer would Paul Manifort so consistently do the bidding of oligarchs loyal to Vladimir Putin? Foer asserted as evidence of trump’s admiration for Putin’s bare-chested leadership.

May 5, 2016, The New York Times Magazine published a long interview with the young White House foreign-policy adviser Ben Rhodes by David Samuels, titled “The Aspiring Novelist Who Became Obama Foreign-Policy Guru.”, in which Rhodes spoke candidly about how he manipulated the media and used them to disseminate his talking points. Rhodes gave the Obama Iranian deal as an example of how the Obama administration created an echo chamber by using officials within the administration and experts from think tanks and academic communities and the media, Rhodes said “They were saying things that validated what we had given them to say.” Rhodes boasted how the Obama administration exploited younger journalists, 27 years old who “literally know nothing,” but went on to say the echo chamber was created with the older, experienced journalists, the men and women at the top of their profession whom Rhodes claimed he manipulated for two terms of the Obama administration. Rhodes said all they wanted was access to President Obama and Rhodes referred to himself as the “Dean of American Journalism they deserve no less.”

May 17, 2016, Washington Post article by Tom Hamburger and Rosalind S. Helderman reporting on Sater’s Trump related business dealings. [Note: Hamburger known Simpson or 10 years when they both worked at the wall street journal.]

May 30, 2016, Washington Post article by Kevin Sullivan reported on trump project in Azerbaijan staring Anar Mammadov titled “Trump in Azerbaijan,” highlighting Mannadov criminal ties.

June 4, 2016, AP article by Jeff Horwitz published a story on Anar Mammadov ties to Trump.

June 17, 2016, Washington Post article by Tom Hamburger and Helderman talk about Maniforts ties to Yanukoyovch, Carter Page’s work in Moscow, Flynn 2015 dinner in Moscow sitting next to Putin and Trump involvement in the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow with the Agalarovs who told Post they have close ties to Putin and how trump had great respect for Putin and Trump and his family members trips to Moscow since the 1980s.

July 4, 2016, Slate article by Franklin Foer, titled Putin Puppet alleging Trumps ties to Alfa bank and Manifort business ties in the Ukraine and claiming Sater worked in Trump tower and Sater business cards described him as a Senior Advisor to Donald Trump. Page was also mentioned in the article regarding gas giant Gazprom and Flynn 2015 RT dinner in Moscow.

July 18, 2016, Washington Post article by Josh Rogin titled “Trump Campaign Guts GOP” s Anti-Russia Stance on Ukraine,” pushing the narrative that Trump was a Russian Asset and had stripped out the providing lethal defensive weapons to the Ukraine.

July 18, 2016, New York Magazine by Jonathan Chait Titled “Trump relationship with Russia,” wherein Chait claimed that Putin overthrow the Ukrainian government through Paul Manifort.”

July 20, 2016, New York Times Editorial board gave its stamp of approval on GPS campaign a stamp of approval columnist editor A.M. Rosenthal saying the idea that there is some nefarious undertone’s to Trump obsession to Putin- is the Russian leader flattering Trump to somehow gain control over him?-somehow does not seem entirely crazy.”

July 21, 2016, Washington Post article by Anne Applebaum titled “The Manchurian Candidate” portraying Trump as an outright Russian asset and alleged that Russia is clearly participating in the Trump campaign. Applebaum cited the article by Foer in Slate and Rogin article in the Post.

July 22, 2016, The New York Times Paul Krugman filed an article titled “Donald Trump, the Siberian Candidate, “on Trump watering down the GOP platform on the Ukraine.

July 24, 2016, article in the Weekly Standard by William Kristol Titled “Putin Party,” listing the shady connections Team Trump had to Russia listing Page, Flynn and Manifort.

July 26, 2016, article in the Washington Post by Amber Philips, titled “ “Clinton Campaign Manager Robby Mook: Russians leaked Democrats emails to help Donald Trump.”

January 10, 2017, the Steele dossier 35 pages of raw intelligence from anonymous sources containing allegations of misconduct, conspiracy and cooperation between Donald Trump’ Presidential campaign and the Russian government was published by BuzzFeed News.

January 10, 2017, CNN by Jake Tapper published their block buster story based upon leaks from ‘multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefing that the intelligence chiefs told President-elect Trump about part of the Steele dossier. [Note: Director Comey after the intelligence briefing by Clapper, Rogers, and Comey, Comey asked to be alone with Trump where he briefed Trump on the salacious Pee dossier.

January 12, 2017, The Washington Post’s David Ignatius published a leak from an unidentified Senior US official in the Obama administration describing Flynn’s communications with Kislyak after President Obama announced the anti-Russian sanctions. Ignatius focused on a statute called the Logan act which purports to criminalize any correspondence or intercourse with agents of a foreign government conducted without authority of the US. The court has never ruled on its constitutionality as it hadn’t been used for 219 years. [Former Obama administration Acting AG Yates at her testimony before the US Senate told the Senators she was considering investigating Flynn for violation of the Logan Act.]

February 10, 2017, CNN Politics report that for the first time US investigators say they have corroborated some of the communications in the Steele dossier and said President Obama was briefed on the dossier prior to Trump’s inauguration. Sources indicated that the conversations between Senior Russian officials and other Russian individuals in the Steele dossier was confirmed by intercepts by US Intelligence collection agencies and that the conversations took place. CNN report that based upon the intercepts has given US Intelligence and Law Enforcement greater confidence in the creditability in the dossier. [Note: Fact that the information in the Steele dossier was provided to Steele by a Russian Intelligence source as part of a Russian disinformation campaign against the U.S., the fact that U.S. law enforcement and Intelligence sources told CNN that information in the dossier was corroborated by intercept communications in and of itself evidence of a false flag operation by the Russians against the U.S. and evidence of the Obama administration false flag conspiracy against President Trump conspiracy using the intercepts as the basis for legal justification for the Intelligence Community Assessment and FISA warrants for the FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Since Russian Intelligence were the originators of the information in the Steele dossier and fed Steele the disinformation on Trump, so it seems highly likely they would have conversations knowing the conversations were being intercepted by U.S. Intelligence to lend creditability and convince U.S. Intelligence that the information in the Steele dossier was creditable. A method commonly used by Intelligence agencies throughout the history of spy craft. The problem for the FBI is that they and the CIA knew the information in dossier was disinformation and yet they continued their efforts under the color of authority to sabotage President Trump presidency.]

February 13, 2017, article in Washington Post by Adam Entous, Ellen Nakashima and Philip Rucker titled “Justice Department warned White House that Flynn could be vulnerable to Russian blackmail, officials say.”

March 29, 2017, article Fox news by Evelyn Farkas titled “Former Obama officials discloses rush to get intelligence on Trump Team.”

October 29, 2017, article in Axios by Steve Levine titled “Meet the reporters behind the Trump dossier.”

February 6, 2018, article in Washington Post, by Tom Hamburger and Rosalind Hederman titled “Hero or hired gun? How a British former spy became a flash point in the Russian investigation.”

May 21, 2018, article in the Federalist by Sean Davis titled “E-mails show FBI Brass discussed dossier briefing details with CNN.”

January 14, 2019, article in the Epoch Times by Jeff Carlson, titled “McCabe FBI tries to re-engage Christopher Steele after Comey was Fired.”

May 29, 2019, Mother Jones article by David Corn titled “Mueller Reminds the Nation That Trump Betrayed the USA, Treachery is not always a crime.” Corn promotes the Trump-Russian hoax using remarks given during Mueller press conference that: Putin “launched a concerted attack on our political system.” He noted the Russians “used sophisticated cyber techniques to hack into computers and networks used by the Clinton campaign. They stole private information and then released that information through fake online identities and through the organization WikiLeaks. The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate.” The Kremlin’s goal was to impede Hillary Clinton and, consequently, boost Trump. And, Mueller added, “a private Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian citizens posed as Americans in order to influence an election. “In other words, there is no Russian hoax. This is no Deep State concoction cooked up to subvert Trump’s campaign or his presidency. The attack was real. It was significant. And there was a compelling need to investigate it and any contacts between Trump associates and Russians.

April 22, 2020, article published in the Washington Examiner by Daniel Chaitin Titled “John Brennan claims Russia finding ‘totally validated as top prosecutor digs deeper.” Brennan made a declaration of vindication opining that the report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee finding of ‘totally validated the 2017 intelligence assessment on Russian election interference.

April 23, 2020, article published in the Daily Caller by David Krayen, titled former “NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan buried evidence that Putin actually favored Hillary in 2016.” Former CIA and National Security Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz claimed that the former Obama CIA Director ignored intelligence that Russian Vladimir Putin actually wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 Presidential Election. Fleitz said Brennan suppressed high quality intelligence for low quality intelligence that failed to meet the Intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win. Fleitz noted that the Senate Intelligence Committee report conflicts with the findings of the house intelligence committee report stating that the Senate report falsely claims all analytical lines are supported by all source intelligence and that the committee did not follow proper procedures in their investigation and based their conclusions on too few intelligence sources.

[Note: Senate and Congressional committees are oversight authorities charged with investigating if law enforcement and intelligence agencies are following the procedures set by Congress in carrying out their fiduciary responsibilities. If misconduct or corruption is uncovered all they can do is make referrals to the DOJ. DOJ is the only charging authority within the government that has the legal authority to investigate criminal misconduct and governmental corruption, not Congress. Based upon what been recently unclassified and released information by the AG and the DOJ/IG if I was Brennan, I would be silent as he is one of the main targets of the Durham investigation. During a April 2020, recent interview of AG Barr by Fox host Laura Ingraham, AG Barr said President Trump has a right to be upset with the FBI counterintelligence investigation saying “what happen to Trump was one of the greatest travesties in American history without any basis, they started this investigation of his campaign, and more concerning, actually, is what happened after the campaign, a whole pattern of events while he was president or at least have the effect of sabotaging the presidency.” The AG said “M own view is that the evidence shows were not dealing with just mistakes or sloppiness” “There is something far more troubling here, and we’re going to get to the bottom of it, and if people broke the law and we can establish that with evidence they will be prosecuted.]

[Note: The Senate Intelligence Committee finding conflicts with the information released in the classified footnotes by the DOJ/IG with the Republican finding in the Congressional Intelligence Committee finding which were verified by the redacted classified findings in the DOJ/IG. The Obama administration disinformation campaign with the media in promoting the Steele dossier Russian disinformation Trump-Russian hoax has resulted in accomplishing the main objective of the Russia False Flag operation against the U.S. in sowing distrust of our institutions, division in the country along partisan lines, and loss of faith in our democratic election system. The myth that portions in the dossier was corroborated by U.S. Intelligence continued to be posted on the Wikipedia web site as being corroborated information when the facts don’t bare it out, again an example of how the disinformation is used in deceiving the public that the dossier was creditable.]

Here the million-dollar question for all Americans to ask themselves, does the Rule of Law matters or does the end justify the means?

If Hillary Clinton had been elected President, the governmental corruption, weaponization and politicization of the FBI, DOJ, CIA and State Department by the Obama administration would have never been uncovered which should be chilling to every American citizen regardless of party affiliation or animas toward President Trump if you believe in were a nation of law and the Constitutional matters.

The legal foundation of our country is based upon the Rule of Law, equal justice under the law, that no one is above the law and that every person is subject to the law vice those under an oligarchy, monarchy or dictatorship where the rulers are above the law. The threat to our society is when there is a disconnect between legal and popular consensus, where there is neglect or ignorance of the law by the public and when a government fails to take corrective actions in restoring the public trust in the Rule of law.

Today the country is divided along partisan and ideology lines promoted by the media, left and democrats fixation on all thing Trump where 93% of all media reports are negative, false or attributed to anonymous unverified sources and Russian disinformation.

The real threat however is the corruption of the conspirators in the prior administration, former Obama officials, loyalists inside the government to include President Obama of forming a resistance movement to obstruct the Trump presidency and remove Trump from office through impeachment.

This is the biggest scandal in U.S. History and creates a constitutional crisis of major proportions of an outgoing President authorizing an investigation into an incoming President based upon Russian disinformation to sabotage and frame a duly elected President for crimes he didn’t commit, to protect the Obama legacy and return the left to power.

[Note: The opinions expressed are mine alone, and do not reflect the official positions of the Department of Justice or the United States government.] John Seaman

1 Open source information used in this document came from Republican Congressional Findings of the Congressional Committee on Intelligence by Congressman Nunes, Senate & Congressional Investigation findings and reports, DOJ/IG reports, IC/IG reports, Judicial Watch court proceedings and documents obtained from their FOIA court case, FISA court rulings, media reporting from reporter John Solomon, the hill and Just the News, reporter Sara Carter, Chuck Ross, Daily Caller, published books by Andrew C. McCarthy, former Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York, titled “Ball of Collusion the plot to rig and election and destroy a Presidency,” Lee Smith titled “The Plot against the President and Gregg Jarrett a fox news contributor, titled “Witch Hunt the story of the greatest mass delusion in American political history. Senate and Congressional testimonies.

MILG-POPS

Friday, May 1, 2020

Obama administration disinformation campaign against President Trump. by John Seaman

THE BIGGEST CORRUPTION SCANDAL IN U.S. HISTORY

Subject: Obama administration disinformation campaign against President Trump.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me