ZOA Urges Others-Join ZOA to Condemn and Counter those Creating Atmosphere of Jew-Hatred

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT MORTON A. KLEIN 212-481-1500
FOLLOW @MORTONAKLEIN7 ON TWITTER. WEBSITE: WWW.ZOA.ORG

NEW YORK, OCTOBER 28, 2018

Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) President Morton A. Klein and Chair Mark Levenson, Esq. released the following statement:
ZOA mourns and is horrified and devastated by the murder of eleven innocent Jews, and the injuring of other Jews and several courageous policemen, at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh.  This massacre was committed by a monstrous, evil, despicable coward who deserves the fullest condemnation and punishment allowable under all applicable federal and state laws.
However, it is not enough to mourn and be horrified by this heinous taking of the lives of innocent Jews immersed in prayer.
It is time for a complete re-orientation of how we deal with the frightening growing evil of Jew-hatred. We must root out and condemn the lies that legitimize the hatred of Jews, Zionists (another way of saying Jews), Israelis (another way of saying Jews), and the Jewish state (another way of expressing Jew-hatred).  It is time to wake up, and for the leaders of all Jewish organizations, Christian and Muslim organizations, local and national government, university and media leaders and social media professionals to meet and join together, and to join with ZOA, in condemning, clamping down on, and countering the daily anti-semitic activities that the world remains largely silent about, and the evil lies spread against Jews and the Jewish state that are feeding into an atmosphere that encourages and legitimizes attacks on Jews.
ZOA urges President Trump to make a major public address on anti-semitism and bigotry, and quickly fill the post of the head of the government department responsible for fighting anti-Semitism.
What do we need to do?



We must act together, strongly, against all these forms of Jew hatred, if we want to reverse the frightening, vicious open anti-Semitism that creates the environment that leads to terrible, violent tragedies.



First, it is time to recognize that those who foment hatred and violence, or excuse it towards one part of the Jewish people, will attack all of our people.  The perpetrator of the Pittsburgh massacre is sadly a case in point. He expressed virulent hatred towards all Jews which include liberals and conservatives, both the pro-Trump Jews in the Trump administration, and the Jews on the other side of the spectrum at Peace Now and HIAS who bring lawsuits against Trump.  He concluded “all Jews must die,” and attacked Jewish people who have nothing to do with either the Trump administration or HIAS.  
The message that we must take from this is that Jew-hatred in any its forms is dangerous to all.
Anti-Semites hate all Jews – not right wing or left wing Jews.  It’s about time that all Jews realize this.
And the lies spread about Israeli Jews and Zionists are particularly insidious and dangerous to all Jews, because they are a method of spreading Jew-hatred while pretending to “only” be attacking the Jewish state.
Next, we must all be loudly condemning vicious anti-Semitic Jew-hating statements, and the bigots who make such statements.  For instance:
Louis Farrakhan calls Jews “termites” and “members of the synagogue of Satan,” and calls Judaism a “gutter religion.”   He should no longer be tolerated; rather he should be roundly condemned and ostracized.
There must be a huge outcry when former Presidents Obama and Clinton and Members of Congress and media personalities stand smiling together with Farrakhan and shaking his hand and sometimes praising him.
Linda Sarsour outright encourages violence against Jews by, among other things: posting and praising a photo of an Arab child with rocks in his hands, walking toward Israeli soldiers, as “the definition of courage”; tweeting her support for the intifada (the Palestinian-Arab terror wars against Jews in Israel) – describing the intifada as “invaluable on many fronts”; and sharing a podium with and praising convicted terrorist Rasmea Odeh, who was convicted of murdering two Jewish college students in a bombing in Israel.  Sarsour also opposes the right of the Jewish state to exist, and expresses her unbridled hatred with tweets and statements such as “Nothing is creepier than Zionism,” “Netanyahu is a waste of a human being,” Zionists can’t be feminists, referring to a Democratic Jewish New York councilman “The Zionist trolls are out to play. Bring it,” and openly supporting anti-Semitic BDS. Outrageously, she demands people must “stop humanizing Jews.”
Sarsour must be condemned by all decent people who wish to end the scourge of Jew-hatred.  And yet, incredibly, she was honored at CUNY’s Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, and praised by politicians including Senator Kirsten Gillibrand.  It’s time for universities and politicians to understand that by praising virulent Jew-haters such as Sarsour, they are creating the atmosphere that leads to anti-Semitic violence.
Marc Lamont Hill praises Farakkhan and terrorist Rasmea Odeh, promotes boycotts against the Jewish state, promotes the Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) hate group, and writes that saying “Israel has a right to exist” is “Israeli propaganda.”  He must be condemned and promptly be fired from his Temple University and CNN positions.
Geraldo Rivera stated on Fox News show The Five (3/30/18) and in his recent memoir that he regretted not doing more to back the Palestinians in the Second Intifada against Israel. He must be condemned and fired.  The Second Intifada (2000-2005) was a terror war in which Palestinian-Arab terrorists slaughtered over 1,000 innocent Jews and maimed 10,000 innocent Jews in bombings of Jewish pizza stores, buses and Passover seders.  It is sickening and frightening that Geraldo regrets not doing more to back Palestinian-Arabs that carry out these massacres of Jews.  Geraldo also calls the Jewish state the “Unholy Land”; and falsely twisted the PLO/Hamas/Islamic Jihad hostage-taking and seizure of the Church of the Nativity into an “Israeli siege.”
Mahmoud Abbas (President of the Palestinian Authority) must be condemned by all for his outrageous $400 million per year of “pay to slay” payments to terrorists to murder Jews, and his repeated broadcasts of hate-mongering incitement against Jews and Christians – including praising terrorists who spill blood to remove Jews and Christians “filthy feet” from Jerusalem.  Yet, the media and too many others are silent about these outright calls to murder Jews and Christians.
Next, the world must unite in condemning the horrific attacks on innocent Israelis from Gaza.. The world must condemn the attempts by Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and other Palestinian-Arabs whom they incite, to invade Israel to murder Jews; and launch barrages of rockets and terror balloons at Jewish civilians living in the Jewish State.
There should be New York Times and other editorials condemning the actions of Hamas and the Gazan attackers. Yet instead, we hear “blame the Jews” for defending themselves.  We hear lies that Israel is attacking “innocent demonstrators.”  We hear lies from politicians such as Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez that the Jewish state is massacring Palestinians. We must hear repeated condemnations by Jewish leaders and others of these propaganda lies.
Hatem Bazian is a professor at UC Berkeley who was just appointed to an important post on the Berkeley City Council by Council member Cheryl Davila.  Bazian has a long history of anti-Semitic actions and views. Davila also asked inappropriate questions about the views on the Palestinian Arab-Israeli situation of a member of a government committee, who was fired in turn. There should have been a condemnation of Davila’s appointment of Bazian, and her actions in firing the committee member. No group except ZOA spoke out. Where were the others? Allowing all these things to go unanswered creates a horrific atmosphere of Jew-hatred.  The world must develop a sense of decency, and condemn the Gaza rockets and terror balloons.
SJP leaders are screaming “Jews off our campus” and “Death to the Jews.”  Sarsour calls for de-humanizing Jews, and praising murderers like Rasmea Odeh, yet she receives an honorary doctorate at City College. There is not a strong enough outcry condemning the BDS and lies that underlie BDS. This failure to act and speak out allows these lies to permeate.
Next, we all must clamp down on and publicly and repeatedly condemn anti-Semitic hate groups who are creating an unsafe environment for Jews on our campuses and in the public square, including SJP (Students for Justice in Palestine), the misnamed “Jewish Voice for Peace,” CAIR, MPAC, Black Lives Matter, and other BDS groups.
We cannot tolerate the Jew-hatred of MPAC, whose leader opposes the existence of the Jewish state, and the Black Lives Matter platform, which supports the pernicious anti-Semitic BDS, and levels incendiary false accusations against the Jewish state, including falsely accusing the Jewish state of ethnic cleansing towards Palestinian-Arabs.  
Government and university officials, and Jewish and other groups can no longer fail to act when SJP screams “death to the Jews” on CUNY campuses (see, e.g., ZOA’s extensive documentation of SJP’s violent activities at CUNY, at “ZOA Letter to CUNY Leaders about Anti-Semitic, Violence-Inducing Rallies There,” Feb. 22, 2016).   SJP and its allies on campuses across the country are creating an environment that feels hostile and even unsafe for Jewish students.
At New York University (NYU) last spring, SJP and its partner JVP took BDS (anti-Israel boycotts, divestment and sanctions) to an extraordinarily sinister level.  They assembled over 50 other student groups to join them in boycotting Israeli goods, boycotting Israeli academic institutions and conferences, and boycotting several off-campus pro-Israel groups, including the ZOA.  Shockingly, this coalition of student groups also pledged to boycott NYU’s pro-Israel student clubs.  SJP is marginalizing and intimidating Jewish and pro-Israel students. Where is the media, Jewish groups, and politicians outcry?
Yet, even though these actions violate NYU rules and policies, ZOA’s repeated calls to NYU officials to put a stop to this bullying campaign have been met with silence.  University officials cannot continue to fail to respond to such hatred leveled at Jewish students.
At University of California Santa Barbara last March, SJP published a series of words and images on Facebook that, taken together, condoned and appeared to encourage violence against Israelis and Jews.  They included a cartoon – drawn in an outline of Israel, including Judea and Samaria – depicting a woman with an AK 47 assault rifle.  Facebook took the images down because they were so extreme.  Yet the university imposed no consequences and did not even condemn SJP’s postings even though SJP’s violent threats violated the code of conduct.  This silence in the face of anti-Semitism cannot continue.
Our university leaders are silent about these issues. Instead of condemning incitement and hatred towards Jews, university leaders legitimize such incitement by invoking “free speech.”  Why don’t university leaders, at a minimum, use their free speech to condemn the Jew-haters who are bullying Jewish students on their campuses?  Why don’t they abide by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which requires universities to provide a harassment-free environment for Jewish and pro-Israel students?
Jewish and other groups must join with ZOA in bringing Title VI and other actions against universities who are derelict in protecting Jewish students.  We can no longer tolerate the university inaction that contributes to the environment of anti-Semitic hate.  
And Jewish and other groups must stop legitimizing hate-groups such as CAIR and MPAC by signing joint letters with them.
Next, there must be an outcry against those who preach Jew-hatred from the pulpit.  In just the past year, Imams in mosques in New Jersey, Texas, California and North Carolina preached sermons calling for death to the Jews.  This, again, is outrageous and intolerable. Such Imams must be fired and condemned by Muslims, Jews and Christians and politicians such as Congressman Brad Sherman has done.
And next, we must stop the lies about the Jewish state that foment Jew-hatred.  Let’s condemn the haters who falsely claim that the Jewish state is an “occupier” of her own land, and who scream about “occupation” when there isn’t any.  Let’s condemn the haters who complain about not having a Palestinian state when the Palestinian-Arabs turned down a state five times — because their real goal is destroying the Jewish state.  There should be a tremendous outcry against these lies.
We must act together, strongly, against all these forms of Jew hatred, if we want to reverse the frightening, vicious open anti-Semitism that creates the environment that leads to terrible, violent tragedies.





Full story can be found here:
https://zoa.org/2018/10/10378852-zoa-horrified-by-and-mourns-pittsburgh-massacre-of-11-innocent-jews-urges-others-join-zoa-to-condemn-and-counter-those-creating-atmosphere-of-jew-hatred/












About the ZOA
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) is the oldest and one of the largest pro-Israel organizations in the United States. With offices around the country and in Israel, the ZOA educates the public, elected officials, the media, and college/high school students about the truth of the ongoing Arab war against Israel. The ZOA works to strengthen U.S.- Israel relations through educational activities, public affairs programs and our work on Capitol Hill, and to combat anti-Semitism and anti-Israel bias in the media, in textbooks, in schools and on college campuses. Under the leadership of such presidents as Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver, Rabbi Stephen Wise, and current President Morton A. Klein, the ZOA has been - and continues to be - on the front lines of Jewish activism. www.zoa.org. For more information contact Morton A. Klein 212-481-1500.













The real reason behind Trump's nuclear treaty withdrawal isn't Russia

By Marc A. Thiessen The Washington Post 10-25-18 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-nuclear-treaty-withdrawal-sends-a-message-to-north-korea/2018/10/25/ace9c25e-d86c-11e8-a10f-b51546b10756_story.html?utm_term=.a4f50864c53d

 WASHINGTON -- In announcing his decision to withdraw from the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, President Trump cited Russia's repeated violations and the fact that the treaty does not bind China, which is engaged in the world's most ambitious ballistic missile development program.

But Trump's withdrawal may also be designed for another purpose. It sends a subtle but unmistakable message to North Korea: If you refuse to denuclearize, we can now surround your country with short- and medium-range missiles that will allow us to strike your regime without warning.

At the moment, the Trump administration appears to be making little progress in nuclear talks with Pyongyang. The threat of deployment of intermediate-range missiles in Asia could change the dynamics of those negotiations.

Recall that in 1983, President Ronald Reagan announced plans to deploy hundreds of U.S. intermediate-range Pershing II missiles in Western Europe in response to the Soviet Union's deployment of SS-20 nuclear missiles.

The U.S. deployment sparked mass protests throughout Europe, but it also put enormous pressure on Moscow -- and in so doing laid the groundwork for a series of arms control breakthroughs, including the INF Treaty. By withdrawing from the INF Treaty, Trump can now put similar pressure on Pyongyang. The treaty barred both conventional and nuclear land-based missiles with a range of 300 to 3,400 miles.

Freed from the treaty's constraints, the United States can now deploy hundreds of conventional short- and medium-range missiles to bases in Asia, including in Guam (2,100 miles from North Korea) and Japan (650 miles). There would no longer be a need to send U.S. aircraft carriers on temporary deployments to waters off the Korean Peninsula as a sign of military strength.

The deployment of intermediate-range missiles in the region would put North Korea permanently in our crosshairs. Pyongyang certainly does not want these U.S. missiles on its doorstep. Neither does Beijing, which knows such a deployment would restore U.S. military supremacy in the Pacific.

According to Adm. Harry Harris, former commander of U.S. Pacific Command, China possesses the "largest and most diverse missile force in the world" -- and 95 percent of its missiles "would violate the INF [Treaty] if China was a signatory."

The fact that Beijing has such missiles, while the United States does not, puts the United States at a strategic disadvantage in any conflict with Beijing.

As my American Enterprise Institute colleague Dan Blumenthal pointed out in The Washington Post, our only possible response would be to strike China with intercontinental ballistic missiles -- an unacceptable escalation. By contrast, the U.S. withdrawal from the INF Treaty allows deployment of conventional mobile ground-based missiles in Guam and Japan, improving our ability to deter Chinese aggression.

Trump can deploy Tomahawk cruise missiles on ground launchers to the Pacific almost immediately after withdrawal from the treaty. Withdrawal would also pave the way for U.S. development and deployment of new missiles banned by the treaty, as well as new hypersonic weapons -- which travel five times faster than the speed of sound -- to compete with China's massive investment in these capabilities. This would be a massive strategic setback to both China and North Korea.

So by withdrawing from the INF Treaty, and clearing the way for such deployments, Trump has given the United States a massive new bargaining chip. North Korea now has a new incentive to denuclearize, and China has a new strategic interest pressuring them to do so.

It still may not work.

But if those negotiations fail, Trump's INF Treaty withdrawal has given the United States a fallback option that will allow Washington to more effectively deter both Beijing and Pyongyang -- and reassert American military primacy in the region.

Ever Get the Feeling Someone Out There Is Bi-Poller?

DOV FISCHER  The American Spectator  10-22-18

https://spectator.org/ever-get-the-feeling-someone-out-there-is-bi-poller/

In just a few weeks we’ll know if history repeats itself by correcting actual voter preference numbers.

With polls sometimes going one way, and with results sometimes going another way, do you ever get the feeling that someone out there is bi-poller?

In 2016, Republican Pat Toomey was facing off against Democrat Katie McGinty for United States Senate from Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania is a blue Northeastern state — part of the impenetrable blue wall. The Real Clear Politics (RCP) average of polls going into Election night had McGinty winning by 2.0 points at 45.0 to 43.0. In fact, Toomey won by 48.9 to 47.3. Or, as Hillary would say, Toomey won the popular vote. (And his name is the opposite of #MeToo!)

In 2016, Republican Todd Young was facing off against Democrat Evan Bayh for United States Senate from Indiana. The Bayh family have had a long and successful record in Indiana politics. The Real Clear Politics (RCP) average of polls going into Election night had the two candidates within less than a point’s difference from each other. In fact, Todd Young won by nearly ten points: 52.1 to 42.4. Or, as Hillary would say, Young won the popular vote.

In 2016, Republican Ron Johnson was facing off against Democrat Russ Feingold for United States Senate from Wisconsin. Feingold had been a very successful candidate for the U.S. Senate before. For months, every single poll had Feingold winning. Well, OK — only 30 out of 31 predicted a Feingold victory. The Real Clear Politics (RCP) average of polls going into Election night had Feingold winning by 2.7 points at 47.0 to 44.3. In fact, Johnson won by 50.2 to 46.8, a margin of 3.4 points. Or, as Hillary would say, Johnson won the popular vote.

See where this is going? Republican Senator Roy Blunt won in Missouri two years ago by more than twice the margin (2.8 points) that the RCP average predicted for him (1.3 points) against Democrat Jason Kander. Republican Marco Rubio, fresh off a tough primary contest with Donald Trump, was challenged by Democrat Patrick Murphy for the Florida Senate seat. RCP’s average had Rubio winning by 3.7 points. He actually won by more than twice that margin: 7.7 points. And Republican Richard Burr defeated Democrat Deborah Ross for the North Carolina Senate seat by 5.7 points — even though the RCP average had him by only 2.0. All comfortably wider Republican margins than predicted by the polls.

Those were the tough ones, the tight United States Senate races of 2016. All too often, for whatever reason — and, despite legitimate contempt for the Seedier Media — maybe the reason for polling misses is not always sinister but enigmatic. Often, for whatever the reason, they underestimate the Republican advantage. Maybe they get their polling percentages right as among the people whom they survey — how Catholics will vote, Methodists, Episcopalians, Christians, Jews; how Blacks will vote, Latinos, Native Americans, Asian-Americans, Caucasians, and Elizabeth Warren. How seniors will vote, Millennials, incoherents, Illegals. And then, having gotten the percentages right, perhaps they underestimate how many of the Republicans among them actually will turn out or overestimate Democrat turnout. Maybe they overestimate the number of felons, banned from voting, who will break out of prison on Election Day to cast ballots for their favored Democrats. Or the vaunted Epitaph Vote: the number of dead people in Chicago who will cast votes in Windy City cemeteries or the others dying to help Al Franken steal an election in Minnesota as long as he keeps his busy hands busy stuffing ballot boxes instead of.…

As we move towards the 2018 midterms, we do have to acknowledge that some polls might be almost right. No one benefits by disregarding the polls outright. But the pollsters do have a documented frequent tendency to underestimate Republican chances. Maybe they really believe that married Caucasian women this year really will vote the way their narrative predicts that “all women” monolithically will vote. Maybe all women (except for the ones in my synagogue congregation) really believe that Christine Blasey Ford put a second front door into her house because of claustrophobia (and just-so-happened to find a renter soon after who liked the idea of renting a claustrophobia-free place that coincidentally offered a separate entrance and exit) and really does hate all that flying she does for fun and sun. Maybe all Caucasian married women really want ranking member Maxine Waters to chair the House Committee on Financial Services. Indeed, what Caucasian married woman in America does not wear a button that says “Please, Maxine, Destroy My Family’s Finances”? Surely, we all know scores of married Caucasian women who leave their children behind every day, and call in sick from work, so that they dutifully can carry out Maxine’s charge to her legions to go out harassing people at gas stations, restaurants, and movie theaters. That appeals to women voters: Eric Holder urging them to kick Republicans. Cory Booker urging them to get in Republicans’ faces. And Hillary telling them that the only thing holding them back is that their husbands and sons control their minds and tell them how to vote.

Maybe the pollsters correctly gauge that college-educated suburban Caucasians and African Americans and Latinos and Asian Americans and Gays and Straights really want to return to an Obama pseudo-economy that never exceeded 2 percent GDP growth because — as President Trump always has feared — they just are sick-and-tired of winning. With two years of a robust economy, deregulation of the Obama strangleholds on business, expansion of energy exploration from hydraulic fracturing to ANWR leading to American energy independence, strengthening and complete rebuilding of the United States military, revamping healthcare for veterans, moving the American Israeli embassy to Jerusalem, staring down North Korea and stopping the Doughboy’s missile launchings, staring down Vladimir Putin and arming Ukrainians as Obama never did, destroying the ISIS caliphate in Raqqa, forcing NATO countries to pony up on their payments before America withdraws from protecting their derrieres, successfully renegotiating NAFTA by inducing Mexico to agree to new terms that advantage American workers and then leaving Trudeau with no choice but to back down and agree likewise to America’s terms of renegotiation, pulling out of the ridiculous Paris Climate Accord that allowed everyone to sit back and watch American industry handcuff itself and allow our jobs to go to China, India, and other emerging powers; and walking out of the perilous Iran Deal — maybe suburbanites really are getting disgusted with and nauseated by winning so much.

Tax cuts, pride in the flag, security at the border — these are the kinds of frightful apparitions of the impending Halloween season for those who truly are tired of winning. If only we could have a return to Hillary and Benghazi, Eric Holder and “Fast and Furious,” Susan Rice and her television interviews attributing the 9-11 Benghazi massacres to a YouTube video that only she and Hillary saw — and Susan returning to glory by hailing Bo Bergdahl for his “distinguished” service. If only we could return to Lois Lerner weaponizing the IRS to use tax levies and withdraw tax accreditations based on politics, return to Loretta Lynch meeting with #MeToo Bill at the tarmac to pervert justice while a corrupt FBI upper-echelon made a mockery of investigation and justice when they confronted Hillary’s felonious spoliation of evidence during the scandal over her bathroom computer server.

Maybe the pollsters correctly gauge that voters miss the days when we were losing our manufacturing base to China and India. Maybe they have identified blocs of voters who are nervous that, in the event of a serious war, we now are assured that we always will have a thriving steel and aluminum industrial base at home. Maybe they felt more comfortable knowing that, in war time, we always could rely on other countries to divert all their aluminum and steel to us. Like, why would Great Britain or Japan or Germany give themselves priority over America in supplying aluminum and steel during war time? Maybe the pollsters have identified power voting districts of people who can’t stand winning the re-shaping of the federal judiciary to reflect a respect for the Constitution as it is written and as it was conceived by our Founders.

Maybe the suburban voters rue the reduction of judges who basically skip over the Constitution, ignore precedent, defy stare decisis, and just wake up in the morning and decide: “Here’s the new law I am going to legislate today from the bench — and then I will issue a nationwide injunction coercing every other court in America to follow the great idea that I came up with over my organic corn flakes and almond milk.” Maybe the suburbans and rural voters, the educated and the uneducated, the men and the women really want the whole country to turn into California Without the Great Weather — a haven marked by no plastic straws, no plastic bags, $3.85-a-gallon gasoline, state income taxes at 13 percent, homeless enclaves all over the state, feces and urine on the streets, public outbreaks of diseases like typhus more commonly associated with the Third World, and a one-party statewide government that offers the kind of stellar leadership demonstrated at the recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearings held to confirm Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh. After all, what state’s voters would not wish that they, too, could have a choice for United States Senate in two weeks between Dianne Feinstein and Kevin Leon (who recently changed his name to DeLeón for the benefit of the Hispanic voters)? Maybe there is a wave of voters breathlessly panting for their homes to become Sanctuary Cities, too, where Illegals can return again and again — after being deported again and again — and , sooner or later, kill someone innocent like a Kate Steinle… and then have a jury let them off.

Jealous of us, huh? Well, go suck on a plastic straw.

But there does seem to be some hope. Back in the days before the Democrats fretted over the Trump campaign colluding with Russia to impact our elections — that is, back in the days when Hillary’s campaign was colluding with the Russians to impact our elections so that she would win — the Obama-Kerry Administration funneled hundreds of thousands in federal funds secretly to Israel in collusion with Israeli Leftists to overturn their free elections. And the polls predicted that the Obama-Kerry Leftists would defeat the Likud coalition headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Obama-Kerry secretly sent in our tax money to pay for busing anti-Netanyahu voters in Israel to the balloting locations. They paid for polling, volunteers. It was among the most remarkable efforts ever by a country secretly to collude with the insurgents of another country to overthrow their freely elected leaders at the ballot box. The polls predicted a Leftist win. Instead, Netanyahu’s Likud coalition won handily.

It is not clear why polls predicted wrongly that the Obama-Kerry-collusion Left in Israel would defeat the centrist-conservative Likud. Nor why the polls wrongly predicted that the conservative British vote for Brexit would lose to the voters who wanted to remain under European Union hegemony. Nor, for that matter, why the 2016 American polls wrongly predicted the outcomes of the United States Senate races in Pennsylvania, Indiana, Wisconsin, Missouri, Florida, and North Carolina. But it is imperative that Republicans be heartened by this look-back at our bi-poller media survey history, and not be persuaded that a blue wave is as inevitable as a modest red wave in the Senate race and a holding action in the House. No real way to know.

For upright law-abiding Latinos — legal immigrants in our country and legitimate green-card holders — are we sure that they all want to see a mob of 4,000 from Guatemala storm our borders and compete for their jobs, reducing the rate of their wages, driving them out of work? Are we sure that all hard-working Latino and Asian-American entrepreneurs want to give up their Republican tax cuts — for which every Democrat voted no — and abandon their future Republican tax cuts, and have government regulations reimposed on their businesses? Are we sure that all Asian-Americans want another round of Obama-style judges stacked into the federal judiciary so that new admissions quotas can be legalized to keep Asian-Americans and their children and their children’s children out of Harvard and Yale and Princeton and the whole bunch of the Poison Ivy League? Is that really what they all want?

Do all Millennials want to go back to unemployment and begging for unpaid internships in an economy that can offer them no gainful work and no meaningful hope for advancement in their lifetimes? Sure, Obama was really, really cool. He would walk down airplane stairways without holding the rails — very, very cool. And he would have these amazingly cool rappers entertain at the White House, cool druggies with lyrics about killing police officers or burning Presidents. Very, very cool. And — OMG! — how cool was it that he tangoed while terrorist bombs were exploding in Europe? But now that the Obamas took the Millennials for a ride, entering as “community organizers” and leaving them all behind while now standing among the world’s richest multi-millionaires preaching wealth redistribution, are all Millennials of one mind that they had and will have a better future awaiting them under a regime of no jobs, lotsa food stamps, and the Obamacare Individual Mandate?

In a fortnight we will know whether we are polls apart and whether Americans really are sick and tired of winning. Because if they are, the good news for them is that Nancy Pelosi is ready to emerge from mothballs and lead Congress again, and Maxine is ready to be chair of Financial Services. Truly a choice to test the wisdom of the American people.

Photo Credit:John Podesta at Hillary Clinton campaign gathering on Election night 2016 (Voice of America/Wikimedia Commons)

Copyright © 2018 Rabbi Dov Fischer's Samizdat: Resisting The Sanctuary State, All rights reserved. 

You are receiving this email because you opted to receive these samizdat. 

Our mailing address is: 

Rabbi Dov Fischer's Samizdat: Resisting The Sanctuary State

Box 122

5319 University Drive

Irvine, Ca 92612

 America's African-American community has paid and will continue to pay a very high price for the luxury of abortion on demand – socially, economically, spiritually and politically. It is right up there with slavery and the Nazi holocaust

By Dennis M. Howard  October 19, 2018

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/howard/181019


ABORTION RESEARCHER PREDICTS A TOUGH TIME FOR DEMOCRATS FOR THE NEXT 40 YEARS


The current desperation of the Democrats reminds me of the guy falling past the 50th floor of the Empire State Building while reassuring himself, "So far, so good."

The only thing saving them from awareness of their own imminent disaster is their failure to recognize the disproportionate impact of abortion on vital Democrat voting blocks.

That's why they keep yelling and screaming and bumping their heads and threatening to riot. They don't yet understand what has hit them as a result of their pro-abortion policies.

However, as a market researcher and a former Democrat, I have been tracking the abortion numbers since 1992, and my latest findings are bad news indeed for the Democrats.

For the first time in 26 years, I can confidently predict, based on abortion trends, that the Democrats are just about finished as a national party for the next 30 to 40 years.

This, no doubt, will be surprising news for the Democrats. For decades, they have been able to pander to minorities and women and to use those voting blocks to build majorities that were insurmountable by the rest of the electorate.

For example, to overcome a 10 million+ vote Democrat lead among African-Americans, the Republicans typically needed 65% of the rest of the vote just to break even. But those days are over. In the future, the Democrats may be able to raise a few votes from the local cemetery, but there is no way they can bring back America's 61 million victims of abortion.

And that's what will decide the future of the Democratic Party.

Fact No. 1. The harsh reality is that the victims of abortion are disproportionately Democrat. Twenty-five states – mainly Republican red states – have had just 10% of all abortions. That's where most of pro-life America lives. The other 25 states account for 90% of all abortions. With a few exceptions, they have been traditional Democrat blue states.

For example, the top 12 states had 73% of all abortions. That fact alone cost Hillary Clinton 103 electoral votes in 2016. Here's how:

Five of these states – New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Michigan, Massachusetts and Ohio – lost 9 electoral votes just because of population declines due mainly to abortion. Three more of these states – Texas, Florida, and Georgia – gained 6 electoral votes because of population growth, but all three voted for Trump in 2016.

Five states – Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio and North Carolina – voted for Obama in 2012 but switched to Trump in 2016. The impact of abortion on old reliable voting blocks had everything to do with it.

Altogether this cost Hillary a total of 103 electoral votes. If Hillary had won these states, her victory would have been assured.

Eventually even big Democrat states like New York will be vulnerable. New York, for example, has more abortions each year than deaths from all other causes. The majority of them are minority babies and presumably future Democrats.

As a result, black births in New York City dropped in half between 1990 and 2010. New York Hispanics continue to have high abortion rates, while hard-working, blue collar families in upstate red counties keep having babies.

It will take some time in a state with a large minority population like New York, but the demographics of abortion make it inevitable. Sooner or later, the piper must be paid.

Fact No. 2: Catering to women on issues like abortion appears on the surface to give the Democrats a 24 point lead among women compared to an 8 point edge for Republicans among men. That's what the pollsters tell us.

But the demographics of abortion turn that fact upside down.

The truth is: half of all aborted babies are women who will never get a chance to vote. And that means more missing voters and declining margins for Democrats.

To estimate the impact of this on future voting, I adjusted for the fact that you have to be 18 years old to vote, and for the fact that only 60% actually vote.

Given those adjustments, the 2016 total of 61 million abortions adds up to 26 million missing voters, divided more or less evenly between men and women.

But when you account for the differences in how both sexes voted, that meant Hillary's margin was cut by 3 million votes in 2016 while Trump lost only 1 million.

Net loss for Hillary: 2 million votes. All because of past abortions. If all of those aborted baby girls had been around to vote, Hillary would be president today.

Fact No. 3. Nationally, abortion has taken the lives of 21 million future black voters. At least 14 million of these would be of voting age today. If they had voted like other blacks in 2016, Hillary would have won by 6 million more votes.

So don't let anyone tell you that Hillary Clinton didn't pay a very high price for her aggressive support of abortion on demand over the last 26 years.

Tragically, so have African-Americans. Black population growth in the U.S. has declined from 1.7% a year before 2000 to a mere 0.52% in the 18 years since. That's a decline of 69.4%.

Total black population hovers around 43 million. But without abortion, it would be 73 million, including those babies who would already have been born to those who were aborted. That's called "the echo effect," and it is the main reason why the impact of abortion on American voting will last for decades even if all abortions stopped tomorrow.

What is appalling is that the U.S. Supreme Court never gave a thought to this impact on future generations when they decided Roe v. Wade.

There is no question about it. America's African-American community has paid and will continue to pay a very high price for the luxury of abortion on demand – socially, economically, spiritually and politically. It is right up there with slavery and the Nazi holocaust.

Fact No. 4. A similar analysis of younger voters 18 to 49 confirms both the short and long term impact of abortion on current and future voting. This is the group that has been hardest hit by the abortion toll, which has taken the lives of 28.3% of the generation under age 50.

The 18 to 29 group voted heavily for Hillary in 2016, and the older segments less so, but altogether these missing younger voters would have contributed an additional margin of 3 million votes to Hillary in 2016 – more than enough to guarantee a victory.

That didn't include another 22 million missing voters under 18. They represent a loss of another 1.3 million edge for the Democrats in future national elections. Nor did it include any allowance for the expected echo effect – the future voters who would otherwise have been born to those who were aborted.

No matter how you look at it, all of those aborted babies are making a big difference today, and will continue to make an even bigger difference over the next 40 to 50 years as the cumulative total of abortions – and their echo effect on the next generation – continues to climb.

And nobody can stop this. Not even Hillary.

The supreme irony is that America's aborted generation of 61 million is making a growing difference by no longer being around to vote like a block for those who promoted abortion as the answer to all the world's ills.

Their voices are not lost. Their silence speaks for them.

# # #

Dennis Howard has been writing since 1950 and turned to marketing and market research in 1960. For the last 26 years he has been tracking abortion data as President of the Movement for a Better America and is still active at 88 years of age.

Israel and the Democratic Party..... input from a close observer

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/22395

7-1-18   The US Left (Democratic Party) is the greatest existential threat facing Israel

Can you imagine a denial of financial aid, a denial of military support, or even a pro-BDS agenda exercised by a future US Democrat-controlled government?

http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-democratic-party-versus-the-jewish-people/2018/08/27/

8-27-18  The Democratic Party versus the Jewish People.

Progressive-left Democrats think of Israel as a racist, colonialist, settler-state and have little sympathy for it if they even believe it should exist at all. The moderate Democrats merely believe that the Jewish people must be leashed.

The progressive-left and the Democratic Party believe that the Jewish people of the Middle East, in the form of Israel, are not humane to the Palestinian-Arabs.

They tend to view the tiny national homeland of the Jewish people as a European transplant onto “indigenous” Arab land while entirely forgetting that Arabs are from the Arabian peninsula and the Jewish people hail from Judea, which is also known as Israel.

'Jamal Khashoggi,Missing Saudi journalist had 'bloodlust' against Israel'

http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/news.php?Itemid=28797

INN - Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi-born writer who was allegedly murdered on the orders of the Saudi government in Istanbul last week, has been the subject of much concern in the mainstream media since his disappearance.

However, Khashoggi was far from a liberal journalist, writes Jordan Schachtel of Conservative Review.

Schachtel stated that Khashoggi, who wrote for the Washington Post's serious bloodlust when it came to violence against the state of Israel Global Opinions section, was an Islamist extremist who displayed a "serious bloodlust when it came to violence against the state of Israel" and was connected to terrorist organizations.

In 2014, Khashoggi wrote an op ed for the Middle East Monitor, a publication which is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood movement, in which he expressed his hope that Muslim nations would one day work together with the Hamas terrorist organization to destroy the Jewish State. He has written other pieces castigating Muslim nations for failing to support Hamas' genocidal ambitions.

three members of SEAL Team 2 Have been ambushed and attacked by the New York Times and now the Navy

Dear Fellow American, Right now, three members of SEAL Team 2 are under siege. They've been ambushed and attacked. Their names dragged through the mud and their futures put in jeopardy. And, you'll be shocked to know who launched the attack: Our federal government and the New York Times. That's right. Chief Dave Swarts, Chief Xavier Silva, and Petty Officer Dan Dambrosio – some of our Nation's finest Warriors – are under attack by the Country they've risked their lives for. Please, let me explain... Stand with SEAL Team 2 In spring of 2012, SEAL Team 2 was deployed to Uruzgan Province in Afghanistan to providing training and support to the Afghan Local Police (ALP). On May 31st, the ALP brought in several Taliban insurgents for questioning about an IED blast that killed one of their Afghani officers.  Dave, Xavier, Dan, and their team helped separate the insurgents for what they thought would be routine questioning. But it quickly became clear the Afghan police didn't want information – they wanted revenge.  The ALP guys began abusing their Taliban detainees – hitting, kicking, beating with antennas and hoses, and dropping rocks on them.  The SEALs rushed to stop them. They took over the questioning and safely figured out that the Taliban insurgents were indeed responsible for the deadly IED blast.  The SEALs told the ALP to hold onto the men for more questioning. But instead, oddly enough, the ALP commander released them.  Dave, Xavier, and Dan were shocked. They knew the insurgents would likely be back out on the streets making more IEDs.  So, imagine their shock when they heard that one of the released insurgents allegedly turned up dead the very next day – and that the SEALs were being blamed for his death!  The Navy launched an investigation and after months of review board hearings and testimony, they finally determined that Dave, Xavier, and Dan had done NOTHING wrong.  In fact, they concluded that SEAL Team 2's actions actually stopped further abuse of the detainees by the ALP.  And in November 2012, these Warriors were officially found NOT GUILTY.  But THREE YEARS LATER, the New York Times published an article accusing the members of SEAL Team 2 of war crimes in Afghanistan.  Now, these courageous Navy SEALs need YOUR help to fight back... ...because the Navy launched a new investigation – and Dave, Xavier, and Dan are being court-martialed and have been charged with a variety of felonies including:  Dave faces 19 years in prison for conspiracy to make a false statement, assault with a deadly weapon, obstruction of justice, and wrongfully discharging a firearm. Xavier is charged with various assaults on suspected Taliban bombers, including choking, hitting, and kicking. Dan also faces charges for assault and wrongfully discharging a firearm. Will you help Dave, Xavier, and Dan defend themselves by making an emergency donation of $25, $35, $50, or more today? My name is David Gurfein and I'm the CEO of the United American Patriots (UAP), a non-profit organization that provides legal defenses for wrongly accused Service Members.  I'm a 25-year veteran of the Marine Corps with several combat tours under my belt. So, I know firsthand that you can't second-guess the decisions our Warriors make in a warzone in the heat of the moment while sitting behind a desk in Washington, DC. And, you certainly can't prosecute them based on hearsay from the New York Times – years after the fact! Yet, here are three outstanding Navy SEALs who face bogus "war crimes" charges for carrying out the mission they were assigned. It's disgraceful. Worse, these young men can't afford to hire the legal team they need to go up against the endless resources of the federal government on their military salaries. I've spoken with each of their attorneys, and I anticipate the cost of this case will top $450,000 by the trial next spring. It'll be a huge undertaking for the UAP Warrior Fund – but I've personally guaranteed Dave, Xavier, Dan, and their families that UAP will make sure their defenses are fully funded.  We've helped 36 other Service Members clear their names or reduce their sentences, so I know it's possible. But, I'm going to need the help of patriots like you to make sure we have the resources on hand. That's why I'm asking you to make a special, tax-deductible donation of $25, $35, $50, $100 or more today. Your generous support today will help cover the costs of investigators, special witnesses, and other legal fees that we incur on behalf of Dave, Xavier, Dan, and our other Service Members. UAP does not receive any funding from the government and our team operates on a shoestring budget to stretch the value of your dollar further. So please, follow this link right now to make your best gift to the UAP Warrior Fund to help us defend Dave, Xavier, and Dan. Dave, Xavier, and Dan have risked their lives time and time again to defend our Country – and continue to today. Dave actually earned a Bronze Star for a recent deployment to Iraq and Xavier and Dan are leaving any day now for another mission. Surely, these three Warriors deserve better than to be thrown on trial for bogus "war crimes" charges stirred up by the New York Times! Thank you in advance for your support of Chief Dave Swarts, Chief Xavier Silva, Petty Officer Dan Dambrosio, and United American Patriots. Semper fi,   David "Bull" Gurfein LtCol, USMCR (Ret.) Chief Executive Officer, United American Patriots P.S. Navy SEALs Chief Dave Swarts, Chief Xavier Silva, and Petty Officer Dan Dambrosio have been ambushed and second-guessed by political hacks sitting behind a desk in Washington, DC. Now, for fighting for our Country on the battlefield, they face DECADES in prison. Will you help UAP defend these courageous Warriors by making a special donation of $25, $35, $50, or more today? Thank you in advance for your support!   Stand with SEAL Team 2           © United American Patriots   www.UnitedPatriots.org Mailing Address 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314   Defend our Defenders! The UAP Warrior Fund provides much needed legal and financial assistance to American service members who've been unjustly accused. Support our mission here.

This is a sponsored message for Republican Win Daily readers

This email was sent by: Republican Win Daily.

This message was intended for: hlaitin@gmail.com
You were added to the system March 7, 2017.
For more information click here. Update your preferences
Unsubscribe | Unsubscribe via email

Robert Mueller: Formulating a balanced evaluation

Robert Mueller: Formulating a balanced evaluation

 it is important that all investigators be fully transparent.

 Robert Mueller had a distinguished military career. 

However, as US attorney in Boston he knowingly suppressed evidence that kept 4 innocent men in prison for a murder that the FBI knew that they had  not committed.

Robert Mueller's activities as head of the FBI in  withholding information on the uranium one investigation are also questionable

Below is a negative article on Robert Mueller.  Publication does not imply  our endorsement.. We are publishing  it unedited for information purposes  as part of building up a databank to  permit all readers to form their own evaluations.

WHY WAS ROBERT MUELLER AND ONLY ROBERT MUELLER SELECTED TO HAND DELIVER URANIUM TO RUSSIA AND THEN RUN THE TRUMP-RUSSIA WITCH HUNT?

https://www.teaparty.org/robert-mueller-robert-mueller-selected-hand-deliver-uranium-russia-run-trump-russia-witch-hunt-328615/

(Gateway Pundit) – We reported last year that under suspicious circumstances in 2009, then FBI Director Robert Mueller was singled out by Hillary Clinton and former President Obama to hand deliver uranium to Russia. Eight years later Mueller was singled out to run the unconstitutional Trump – Russia witch hunt. This all stinks to high heaven!

Russia Uranium

As we previously reported, WikiLeaks released a memo that was authored by Hillary Clinton’s State Department on August 17th, 2009. In the cable it states –

Over two years ago Russia requested a ten-gram sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) seized in early 2006 in Georgia during a nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian accomplices. The seized HEU was transferred to U.S. custody and is being held at a secure DOE facility. In response to the Russian request, the Georgian Government authorized the United States to share a sample of the material with the Russians for forensic analysis.

The cable also states that –

Given Russia’s reluctance to act so far, FBI Mueller’s delivery of this sample will underscore to Russia our commitment to follow through on this case.”

…. Embassy Moscow is requested to alert at the highest appropriate level the Russian Federation that FBI Director Mueller plans to deliver the HEU sample once he arrives to Moscow on September 21.”

The cable summarizes that –

We regret that the April visit by Director Mueller could not take place due to a scheduling conflict.”

…We require that the transfer of this material be conducted at the airport, on the tarmac near by the plane, upon arrival of the Director’s aircraft.”

The Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton hid the FBI investigation into the Uranium One deal from which the above memo is related.

We also noted last year that an article by the Atlantic from April 2008 tells the fascinating story of the smuggler in the country of Georgia who was arrested trying to sell uranium to potential buyers. The smuggler, Oleg Vladimirovich Khintsagov, on January 31, 2006, was apprehended by authorities carrying 100 grams of highly enriched uranium tucked into a plastic bag in his tattered leather coat.

A sample of the uranium captured during this sting operation was provided to the Russians who analyzed it and determined that it was indeed highly enriched uranium (HEU). In the Atlantic article it states that the Russians at first didn’t respond to requests from Georgia on the uranium and at no time asked for the uranium back. As a matter of fact the Russians worked hard to deny that the uranium came from Russia in the first place.

For some reason Hillary Clinton and President Obama requested that FBI Director Mueller deliver the sample of uranium to Russia!

Of all people, why would the Head of the FBI be selected to transfer uranium to Russia? It would seem that the US has a number of individuals who could perform this transfer and it would seem that FBI Director Mueller would have enough on his plate in the US. When Mueller couldn’t make the transfer in April the transfer was postponed to September 2009 so Mueller could be there.

A short time later, in 2010, the Obama administration approved the very controversial Uranium One deal giving Russia 20% of America’s Uranium. The FBI had evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were involved in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering in order to benefit Vladimir Putin, but led by Mueller, the FBI allowed the deal to go ahead anyways.

The FBI investigation was supervised by then-U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, the current Deputy Attorney General, and then-Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe. Former FBI Director Robert Mueller was the Head of the FBI during this time and was involved in this deal.

Russia Witch Hunt

Eight years later after candidate Trump won the Presidency, the corrupt and criminal leaders of the FBI and DOJ, many who worked for and with former FBI Director Mueller, created the Trump – Russia witch hunt. After months of plotting and working with the mainstream media (MSM) the special investigation was put into play by corrupt DAG Rod Rosenstein.

Rosenstein only told the White House thirty minutes before he announced that he was setting up the unconstitutional Mueller Special Counsel. It was then uncovered that –

President Donald Trump interviewed Robert Mueller as a potential replacement for fired FBI Director James Comey the day before the former FBI director was named special counsel, a White House official said Tuesday.

Within 24 hours of being turned down for the top FBI job under President Trump, Mueller was appointed as special counsel! If Mueller did not get the Head FBI job then he was damn sure going to get the special counsel lead!

In spite of numerous conflicts of interest and multiple criminal or unconstitutional acts, Mueller charged ahead with his witch hunt of the President. This man is not an honest man full of integrity. If he had an ounce of either he never would have accepted the position. He is best friends with the key characters. His whole team is Clinton cronies and his actions to destroy the President while usurping the law are legendary. Maybe as we reported a year ago as well, the entire Mueller special counsel was set up to cover up their prior crimes in addition to destroy the President.

Dirty cop Mueller is a phony not a statesman!

Mueller was hand picked by Hillary Clinton’s State Department to deal uranium to Russia. He next was hand picked by the Deep State to oversee the corrupt Trump – Russia witch hunt.

This whole sham smells worse than manure in a Russian compost mound.

Americans are so tired of the attack on our country by the Democrat Deep State! President Trump please put in place an independent investigation to get to the bottom of the real Russia scandal!

thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/why-was-robert-mueller-and-only-robert-mueller-selected-to-hand-deliver-uranium-to-russia-and-then-run-the-trump-russia-witch-hunt/

University of Michigan Student Reveals Second Anti-Semitic Slide

BY AARON BANDLER | OCT 15, 2018 

 One slide from a required lecture  compared Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Adolf Hitler.  Another anti-Semitic slide from the lecture shows Jews drawn as pigs, drinking from bottles of money and holding a wand with a Jewish star, as if they have supernatural control and power.

These University of Michigan displays echo the Nazi-ism that so many of us in the military gave our lives fighting against, in the hope that we would forever rid the earth of this evil.

Now is the time to contact University of Michigan President Mark Schlissel to protest he and his administration permitting this evil to exist and to grow in his campus. Below are office addresses, phone numbers, fax numbers and emails of his key staff.

Liz M. Barry  Special Counsel to the President

Phone:(734) 764-6270

Email: lizbarry@umich.edu

Office: 2080 Fleming Administration Building

Lauren Belpedio  Administrative Assistant

Phone:(734) 764-6270

Email: labelped@umich.edu

Office: 2050 Fleming Administration Building

Jamie Brandon  Executive Asst to Special Counsel

Phone:(734) 764-6270

Email: jlyost@umich.edu

Office: 2074 Fleming Administration Building

Sara Holliday  Communications Specialist

Phone:(734) 764-6270

Email: saraholl@umich.edu

Office: 2050 Fleming Administration Building

Erika Hrabec Executive Assistant to the President and Chief Administrator

Phone: (734) 764-6270

Email: erikah@umich.edu

Office: 2070 Fleming Administration Building

Katie McGaffigan Administrative Manager

Phone:(734) 764-6270

Email: kmcgaff@umich.edu

Office: 2074 Fleming Administration Building

Cecelia (Cece) Nash Assistant to the Chief Administrator

Phone:(734) 764-6270

Email: cecelian@umich.edu

Office: 2074 Fleming Administration Building

WE SUGGEST THAT YOU MAKE YOUR DISPLEASURE CLEARLY KNOWN. 

Remember, today the Nazis and anti-Semites make inroads at the University of Michigan. Tomorrow, the Nazis and anti-Semites march through your streets to threaten your children.

Thank you to the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles and Aaron Bandler  for this wake-up call.

http://jewishjournal.com/news/nation/240290/michigan-student-reveals-second-anti-semitic-slide/