Friday, January 3, 2014


A quick response to
Why I voted for an academic boycott of Israel


By Carolyn Karcher
December 27, 2013, 



Michael S. Roth slams the American Studies Assn. for "unfairly singling out Israel" in its vote to boycott that nation's academic institutions; he calls the action an "irresponsible attack on academic freedom."
As a 39-year member of the American Studies Assn. (ASA) and a Jewish American,(WHO IS MORE LEFT-WING, THAN JEWISH) I want to explain why Roth -- whoseOp-Ed was published by The Times Dec. 20 -- is wrong and why I wholeheartedly support the organization's resolution.{This resolution is thoroughly consistent with the ASA’s past resolutions denouncing the war against  ??Iraq (EXPLICITLY SUPPORTING SADDAM HUSSEIN'S MURDER  OF THE SHIITES AND THE KURDS)and expressing solidarity with hotel workers(THESE “SUPPORTERS” WOULD RATHER KEEP THEM AS JANITORS AND MAIDS FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES RATHER THAN ADVOCATE INCREASED TRAINING AND THE CHANCE TO RISE THROUGH A CAREER LADDER) and the Occupy movement (WITH ITS HISTORY OF MINOR CRIME AND NARCOTICS ABUSE). I have always been proud of the ASA’s political principles, and I am prouder than ever of its historic vote for justice in Israel and Palestine and for free speech on this issue. THIS IS AN ARTICLE FULL OF UNSUPPORTED AND UNSUPPORTABLE ACCUSATIONS. NOT ONLY IS IT WITHOUT DOCUMENTATION, THERE IS SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION TO PROVE THAT EVERY STATEMENT MADE IS IN FACT A LIE.]
The resolution is far from an attack on academic freedom. In fact, it is a proper response to the routine denial of such scholarly freedom to Palestinian students. Having recently returned home from a trip to Israel and Palestine with Interfaith Peace-Builders, during which I was more profoundly shaken than I could ever have imagined by the brutality I saw toward Palestinians,{NOTICE THE ABSENCE OF  PERSONAL EYEWITNESS FIRSTHAND ACCOUNTS AND DEPENDENCE ON RECYCLED THIRDHAND ACCUSATIONS.} I feel more strongly than ever the urgency of taking a stand in solidarity with Palestinians and their beleaguered Israeli allies.
On our first day in Bethlehem, my husband and I met a young man who had received a scholarship from George Mason University in Virginia but was not granted an exit visa by the Israeli authorities. Instead of embarking on a promising journey in academia, this young Palestinian had to resign himself to a job selling souvenirs to tourists. We learned that Palestinian students of all ages endure harassment at military checkpoints, frequent school closures, unprovoked arrests, imprisonment and sometimes death at the hands of trigger-happy soldiers.{ PROOF? DOCUMENTATION? RECYCLED THIRDHAND ACCUSATIONS}
Within Israel proper, schools are segregated and, following the model of the Jim Crow South, the government allocates significantly less funding to Palestinian schools, which are often overcrowded and understaffed. Palestinian university professors IN GAZA rarely receive permission to travel abroad for conferences, those in the West Bank also face difficulties, and international faculty have been prevented from visiting Palestinian universities.{ONLY THOSE WHO GO TO THROW ROCKS AT THE IDF __LIKE PROF SAID} These are the true assaults on academic freedom that the ASA resolution addresses.
Here in the U.S., students and faculty who challenge the dominant view of Israel risk baseless accusations of anti-Semitism, arrest, blacklisting or denial of tenurepromotion or academic positions. There are dozens of known incidents{ NAME  ONE}, and likely hundreds that go unreported.
Last year, members of the New York City Council sent a letter to the president of Brooklyn College threatening to cut the school’s public funding for refusing to cancel a panel on the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS). The incident put academic freedom in the national spotlight, withMSNBC host Chris Hayes warning that when politicians "line up to attempt to force an academic institution to cancel an event particularly when some of those politicians ...actually determine the budget of the institution. Think of the precedent being set here."{THE ACTUAL FACTS OF THE INCIDENT ARE SO DIFFERENT THAT MS. KARCHER CAN ONLY BE ACCUSED OF DESPICABLE LIES. THE ACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES WERE THAT PUBLIC MONEY WAS USED TO SUBSIDIZE A PANEL EXCLUSIVELY DEVOTED TO ATTACKING ISRAEL. FURTHER, PUBLIC FACILITIES WERE  TURNED OVER TO AN OUTSIDE , NON-AFFILIATED GROUP THAT ARBITRARILY EXCLUDED PRO_ISRAEL  STUDENTS BY FALSELY CLAIMING THAT THEY WERE BEING DISRUPTIVE.  AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION FAULTED THE BROOKLYN COLLEGE ADMINISTRATION FOR ALLOWING A SINGLE NONUNIVERSITY PERSON TO THREATEN STUDENTS  WITH ARREST BY THE BROOKLYN COLLEGE POLICE THAT THE VIDEOTAPES SHOWED WERE PEACEFUL AND NONDISRUPTIVE.]
In 2011, the Orange County district attorney charged 11 students at UC Irvine and UC Riverside with "conspiring to disrupt a meeting" for peacefully protesting a talk by Michael Oren, then the Israeli ambassador to the U.S. More than 100 UC Irvine professors stood up for the Irvine 11’s the disruption right to protest.{ HERE THE RECORD IS ALSO CLEAR. THE DISRUPTION WAS PLANNED IN ADVANCE TO PREVENT OREN FROM SPEAKING. DISRUPTION TOOK PLACE AND THE 11 ISLAMIC STUDENTS SHOUTED AND PHYSICALLY TOOK ACTIONS WHICH THREATENED BOTH  THE SPEAKER AND MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE.} In a the resident that statement on the case, the ACLU of Southern California wrote: "We are also troubled by the unprecedented nature of the case. We are unaware of any case where the OC DA pressed criminal charges over this type of non-violent student protest, even though similar disruptions { BY THE MSU }have occurred with other{ PRO-ISRAEL} speakers on the very same campus. This raises the question whether the DA may have acted because of the students' message, which would clearly violate the First Amendment."
Thus, far from curtailing academic freedom, the ASA has extended it in new directions by fostering an honest discussion about the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land and the role of the U.S. in enabling it. In a democratic process, the ASA National Council deliberated for a week, revised the final resolution in accordance with suggestions made during the discussion, and submitted it to the entire membership for ratification.
Like most other academic associations, the ASA includes many jewish members. some helped draft the boycott resolution, others served on the national council that unanimously endorsed it, a large number lobbied and voted in favor of it,{WHICH ILLUSTRATES THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF JEWS, ESPECIALLY IN ACADEMIC LIFE ARE MUCH MORE LEFT-WING THAN THEY ARE JEWISH] and a comparable number lobbied and voted against it. It is disturbing that many critics of the resolution label it "anti-Semitic," implying that either all Jewish people take the same position on this matter, which is false, or that some of us are anti-Semitic or self-hating Jews, {UNINFORMED} a deeply troubling accusation.
It is also problematic to claim that speaking out against Israeli government policies is synonymous with attacks on Jews generally. The ASA resolution does not target individuals on the basis of nationality, ethnic group or religion. The ASA resolution targets institutions that are complicit in the violation of Palestinian human rights. According to the boycott guidelines, individual Israeli scholars, students or cultural workers are able to participate in the ASA conference or to give public lectures at campuses, provided they are not expressly serving as representatives or ambassadors of those institutions or of the Israeli government.{ THIS IS DOUBLE TALK}
Opponents like Roth claim that the resolution singles out Israel while sparing countries with worse human rights records. They forget, however, that the U.S. not only gives far more military aid to Israel than to any other country, { NOT TRUE … THE TOTAL GIVEN TO IRAQ ,JORDAN, EGYPT IN SAUDI ARABIA EXCEEDS BY FAR THE AMOUNT GIVEN TO ISRAEL. ALSO, COMPUTE THE COST US FORCES IN SOUTH KOREA AND GERMANY AND THE OIL  SUBSIDY GIVEN TO SAUDI ARABIA]   but has also vetoed all U.N. resolutions in recent memory that condemn Israel's abuses of human rights. The ASA resolution specifically cites the "significant role" the U.S. plays in underwriting Israel's violations of international law.
This resolution is thoroughly consistent with the ASA’s past resolutions denouncing the war against  ??Iraq (EXPLICITLY SUPPORTING SADDAM HUSSEIN'S MURDER  OF THE SHIITES AND THE KURDS)and expressing solidarity with hotel workers(THESE “SUPPORTERS” WOULD RATHER KEEP THEM AS JANITORS AND MAIDS FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES RATHER THAN ADVOCATE INCREASED TRAINING AND THE CHANCE TO RISE THROUGH A CAREER LADDER) and the Occupy movement (WITH ITS HISTORY OF MINOR CRIME AND NARCOTICS ABUSE). I have always been proud of the ASA’s political principles, and I am prouder than ever of its historic vote for justice in Israel and Palestine and for free speech on this issue. THIS IS AN ARTICLE FULL OF UNSUPPORTED AND UNSUPPORTABLE ACCUSATIONS. NOT ONLY IS IT WITHOUT DOCUMENTATION, THERE IS SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION TO PROVE THAT EVERY STATEMENT MADE IS IN FACT A LIE.]
Carolyn Karcher is a professor emerita of English at Temple University in Philadelphia


ASSESSING KERRY'S PROPOSAL
Yoram Ettinger 1-3-13

The value of U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry's assessments and proposed peace agreement, which would reduce Israel to a 9-to-15 mile waistline (the pre-1967 lines), in the increasingly raging Middle East, is consistent with Kerry's track record.
Kerry's Syrian track record
Until the eruption of the civil war in Syria, Kerry was a member of a tiny group of U.S. senators -- along with Chuck Hagel and Hillary Clinton -- who believed that President Bashar Assad was a generous, constructive leader, areformer and a man of his word. Kerry was a frequent flyer to Damascus, dining with Assad and his wife at the Naranj restaurant in central Damascus. Following a motorcycle ridewith Assad, he returned to Washington referring to the president as "my dear friend."
In September 2009, Kerry opined that "Syria is an essential player in bringing peace and stability to the region," while Assad was conducting hate-education, repressing his opposition, hosting and arming terrorist outfits like Hezbollah, cozying up to Iran, and facilitating the infiltration of jihadists into Iraq to kill U.S. soldiers. WikiLeaksdisclosed that on February, 2010, Kerry told Qatari leaders that the Golan Heights should be returned to Syria and that a Palestinian capital should be established in east Jerusalem. "We know that for the Palestinians the control of Al-Aqsa mosque and the establishment of their capital in east Jerusalem are not negotiable."
According to the London Telegraph, Kerry was a fierce critic of the Bush administration's hardline against Assad, advocating a policy of engagement -- rather than sanctions -- against terror-sponsoring Syria. In March 2011, Kerry subordinated reality-driven hope to wishful-thinking-driven hope: "My judgment is that Syria will move; Syria will change, as it embraces a legitimate relationship with the United States and the West." However, more than 200,000 deaths and 2 million refugees later, Assad's Syria has certainly changed for the worst. In January 2005, following another meeting with Assad, Kerry said: "This is the moment of opportunity for the Middle East, for the U.S. and for the world. ... I think we found a great deal of areas of mutual interest ... strengthening the relationship between the U.S. and Syria."
On September 3, 2013, Kerry assured his colleagues that "the Syrian opposition has increasingly become more defined by its moderation." However, Assad's opposition consists, mainly, of anti-U.S., Islamic supremacists, Shariah-driven, anti-democracy, the violently intolerant Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida, whose subversive vision transcends Syria, encompassing the Abode of Islam as a prelude to the grand assault on the Abode of the Infidel.
Kerry and the Palestinian issue
While vital U.S. interests and homeland security are threatened by smothering Middle East sandstorms -- from the Persian Gulf through northwest Africa -- Kerry is preoccupied with the Palestinian tumbleweed sideshow. The latter has been the centerpiece of the Arab talk, but never the Arab walk. Contrary to Kerry's Palestine-firster approach, the Palestinian issue has not been directly or indirectly linked to the Arab Tsunami and has not been thecrux of the Arab-Israeli conflict nor the crown jewel of Arab policymaking.
Kerry's Arab Spring
According to The New York Times, December 21, 2012 Kerry contended that the Arab Street is transitioning toward democracy: "What is happening in the Middle East could be the most important geo-strategic shift since the fall of the Berlin Wall."
On December 7, 2013, the well-intentioned Kerry followed in the footsteps of President Shimon Peres' New Middle East and U.S. President Barack Obama's "in 2013, the world is more stable than it was five years ago." Kerry pressures Israel to accept an agreement with the Palestinians based on the pre-1967 lines, which were defined by dovish former Foreign Minister Abba Eban as the "Auschwitz lines."
Kerry is preoccupied with pressuring Israel, notwithstanding the transformation of the Arab Spring delusion into a reality of an Arab Tsunami, highlighting the 1,400-year-old intra-Muslim and intra-Arab uncertainty, unpredictability, unreliability, instability, fragmentation, violent intolerance and absence of Arab democracy and civil liberties. This reality requires a higher Israeli threshold of security. U.S. pressure comes despite the clear and present danger of a nuclearized apocalyptic Iran, and Islamic terrorism, to Jordan and the pro-U.S. oil-producing Gulf states, as well as the U.S. mainland; despite the transformation of Iraq into an Iranian-dominated global center of Islamic terrorism; regardless of Turkey's support of the transnational, terrorist Moslem Brotherhood; and in defiance of the inherently provisional and fragile nature of Arab regimes, policies and agreements, which are frequently signed on ice and not carved in stone.
Replacing the tectonic, raging, chaotic reality on the Arab Street with his worldview, Kerry said: "Just think of how much more secure Israel would be if it were integrated into regional security architecture and surrounded by newfound partners. ... I ask you to imagine what a two-state solution will mean for Israel, Palestine, Jordan, and the region. Imagine what it would mean for trade and for tourism -- what it would mean for developing technology and talent, and for future generations of Israeli and Palestinian children. Imagine Israel and its neighbors as an economic powerhouse in the region. ... Think of the new markets that would open up and the bridges between people that peace would build. Think of the flood of foreign investment and business opportunities that would come to Israel, and how that will change the lives of everyday people throughout the region. ... We need to believe that peace is possible. ... Israel would also enjoy a normal, peaceful relationship the minute this agreement is signed with 22 Arab nations and 35 Muslim nations -- 57 countries in all. ... It is not beyond our imagination to envision that a new order could be established in the Middle East, in which countries like Jordan, Morocco, Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the GCC states, a newly independent Palestine, and an internationally recognized Jewish State of Israel join together to promote stability and peace. ... "
However, to survive in the conflict-ridden Middle East, Israel must embrace realism -- as costly as it may be -- and reject imagination, wishful thinking and make-believe, as tempting as they may be.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Obama’s Dangerous Double Standard on Spying, Pollard DECEMBER 26, 2013 3:24 PM 28 COMMENTS Author: Isi Stein


DECEMBER 26, 2013 3:24 PM 28 COMMENTS Author: Isi Stein




I live in a world where countries blame Israel for all their ills, equate Israel’s right to defend herself with the terrorist acts perpetrated by her enemies, and promote boycotts of the only consistent and lasting democracy in the Middle East. It is no secret that since the establishment of the Jewish State in 1948, a dangerous double standard has provided fuel for biased UN resolutions and astonishing EU sanctions against Israel.
In the U.S., the tone was significantly different for many years. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush fought against any effort to delegitimize the State of Israel, and made a point of highlighting, and strengthening, the natural and necessary bond that the two countries share. Therefore, it pains me that a different reality is slowly setting in.
Since 2008, both Democrats and Republicans have been critical of President Obama for giving a cold shoulder to Israel, for implementing dangerous Middle East policies, and for his blatant disregard for diplomatic norms, especially vis-à-vis Israel.
The revelations of Obama’s actions over the past several months cut at the heart of the world’s obsession with applying a double standard to Israel and to the Jewish people.
Several months ago, the Obama Administration strong-armed Israel into releasing terrorists to meet Palestinian preconditions for peace talks. Israel gave in to the pressure, compromised the safety of its citizens, and legitimized the ludicrous idea that releasing 109 murderers, in four stages, would give the Palestinian Authority confidence to sit at the negotiating table.
The third stage of the terrorist release will likely occur next week. Among those who have already been released are Abdel al-Said Uda Yussuf and Massoud Issa Rajib Amer, two terrorists who, in April 1993, slaughtered Ian Feinberg, a young Jewish lawyer who was meeting with local officials to organize economic programs for Palestinians. Within minutes, they dug a knife into his throat, hacked him into pieces with an ax, and then shot him.
The second revelation: The NSA spied on Israel and various Israeli leaders over a period of several years. The Obama Administration, who at first denied allegations of spying, now admits that the United States had monitored the leaders of dozens of countries, including those of some of its closest allies. Though spying is commonplace and is to be expected within the realm of foreign relations, the United States’ spying on the State of Israel is an extra touchy subject.
Why are these two revelations of such consequence? The answer: Jonathan Pollard.
For those not familiar with Mr. Pollard, he was jailed in the 1980’s for passing classified U.S. documents to Israel while working for the U.S. Naval Intelligence Command. Twenty-eight years into his sentence, Pollard continues to sit, alone, behind the dimly lit halls of the Butner Correctional Complex just outside of Raleigh, North Carolina. The disproportionate life sentence that Pollard faces is the harshest punishment ever assessed to an accused spy who passed information to an ally of the United States. Precedent dictates that Pollard’s crime warrants a maximum of six years in a Federal prison. He has now served almost five times that, a term that included seven years in solitary confinement.
When, in August, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked President Obama to commute Pollard’s sentence as part of the release of more than 100 cold-blooded killers, Obama refused. Reports have also surfaced that President Obama sees no connection between the NSA spying scandal and the case of Jonathan Pollard.
The sheer amount of high profile officials who are now urging Obama to commute Pollard’s sentence is staggering. Even those who called for his incarceration almost 30 years ago are now urging our Commander in Chief to release Jonathan Pollard. They include former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and former FBI director William Webster, men who now accept that Pollard needs to be home with his wife, both as a matter of justice and as a result of his declining health.
Former Director of the CIA James Woolsey, who was originally opposed to releasing Pollard, recently urged Obama to commute Pollard’s sentence. He asserted that if the ex-spy were a Filipino-American or South Korean-American, he would no longer be in prison.
As uncomfortable as it is to consider Mr. Woolsey’s comments, he is right. The double standard that the world applies to any person connected to the State of Israel and to the Jewish people, is the same double standard that is responsible for Jonathan Pollard’s continued incarceration. We must bring Jonathan home.
Isi Stein, a New York native, is a recent graduate of the University of Miami, where he earned a Bachelors of Business Administration. He can be contacted at isi@steink.com.
28 COMMENTS
  • M D Fisher
    December 29, 2013 
  • 6:07 am

    When Pollard offered to spy against his country the Israelis should have warned the US that they had given a position of trust to an unreliable person. Pollard would have been sacked but would have been free to go to Israel. Israel would have acted like an ally. Pollard is serving a sentence he earned. Weinberger was Pollard’s boss and was the logical person to present an assessment of the damage that Pollard had done. Pollard betrayed his country. Pollard has not applied for parole. If he got parole he would have to stay in the country he betrayed. If he were pardoned he could go to the foreign he served, and they could make him out to be a hero. He isn’t. He is sleaze.
    REPLY


    • Marcia Karon
      December 31, 2013 
    • 9:08 am

      So why have all those Americans who spied for Russia already been released? Things he was accused of doing were at the hands of Adams. And what about the plea bargain. His sentence and everything surrounding it is pure anti semitism. The information that he provided, not only saved Jewish lives (how many have you saved?)
      but American soldiers in Desert Storm.
      REPLY


  • BH in Iowa
    December 28, 2013 
  • 11:30 pm

    Obama knows he will be granted any wish to release Pollard. His first and only wish is to empty the prisons of jihadist terrorists.
    Very telling indeed.
    REPLY


  • P. Kanefield
    December 28, 2013 
  • 6:33 pm

    Dear God, let him go! If Mr. Obama sees no relation in the two, he is not fit to decide, but we already know that. O has already betrayed Israel as well as America!
    REPLY


  • James Nicholas
    December 27, 2013 
  • 1:46 pm

    To Israel: The Country that Believed Obama and then Released 109 murderers. Here’s your sign, have some more Kool-Aid
    REPLY


  • Denise C.
    December 27, 2013 
  • 9:36 am

    Mr. Stein, very well thought out argument and well written. I believe you make a strong point for the release of Pollard and the anti-Israel stance of the present administration. I’m happy to see that you are speaking out and I encourage you to continue with this quest. I’m looking forward to your next article. A job well done!
    REPLY


  • Mike Driscoll
    December 27, 2013 
  • 8:41 am

    Put like that, it does seem vindictive. Turn him loose & deport him.
    REPLY


  • C. Meir G. Hirsh
    December 27, 2013 
  • 3:29 am

    ב
    Here’ the double edge sword, slippery slope, classic. One can argue, superficially, that due the double-standard or bicameral thinking or lastly, of course, our own self-induced, right or wrong “paranoia” that ‘yep, Mr. Pollard is being given a bad deal because he’s Jewish’ – there is the Jewish paranoia. Since it’s nearly impossible to prove a negative, let us look as “objectively” as possible at the facts. There aren’t too many, so this will be fairly painless.
    Mr. Pollard took an oath of allegiance to protect the ‘classified’ information entrusted to him confidential. That was an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the US, which reminds me, when will Israel draft a Constitution. It’s going on 50 years of existence, maybe the ‘no time’ excuse is getting lame, but I digress. Mr Pollard was not forced in any way to take this oath of allegiance, to uphold and defend the Constitution of the US. As consideration for him receiving his Security Clearance, he provided his word that he will protect that information, commensurate with its level of classification. As you can see, there are certain ‘trusts’ granted by democratic nations, or in this case, republic, that are afforded to those deemed trustworthy and qualifying for a ‘security clearance’. Now comes the interesting part.
    Mr. Pollard, at his own choosing, made some ‘bad’ decisions, relative to the trust placed in him. He personally decided that classified information needs to be seen by a party not stipulated in any part of his allegiance, and totally out of scope. See a problem? Essentially, Mr. Pollard, on his own , went, shall we say rogue, and did not keep his end of the bargain. Little known iis that the extent of his ‘rogue ness’ extended not just to Israel, but other nation-states as well. So, back to the story. Mr. Pollard took classified information out of classified areas, which is bad move number one. Then he decided that he would accept payment for turning these documents over – as a means, of course, to let say, increase his gross earned income. That’s, by the way where this differs with Mr. Snowden, who took no money, but felt an altruistic righteous obligation, to let the public know about what they already news, but in a way larger than life. Sorry, digressed again. Back to Mr. Pollard.
    I hope by now, some new facts are brought to light. Further, Mr. Pollard then , when being pursued for arrest, went to the Israeli embassy, who, get this, would not let him in and instead let him be captured by the FBI and other law enforcement. Let me repeat that, he drove to the Israeli embassy in Washington and they refused him entrance, let alone protection, even temporary. Another twist in the plot.
    There is more to this story, and some would argue the unbalanced and unfair punishment, the double-dealing of Secretary Weinburger and the judge (can’t recall the name).
    Fallout,: Other Jewish Federal employees were looked at more scrupulously, and allegiance to Israel became a question asked during the clearance process. It hurt us and caused a bit of paranoia to every other Jewish Fed with a clearance. He hurt and blemished more innocent people and impacted additional scrutiny to those Jewish employees entrusted with classified information.
    So the. Question is not really whether “Jonathan” has been mistreated, over-punished, and unfairly. The question is, was a crime committed? Was an oath of allegiance violated? Did the recipients of said information do the right thing by cutting him loose? By now it should be clear that all is not as simple as it seems.
    As they say “If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime”.
    Mr. Pollard violated the trust placed in him by his government. That’s big. When it comes to security, especially National Security, it’s clear – there is reciprocity and it is all about trust. Claiming to have passed classified information to an ally is not really relevant. Also, remember, it wasn’t only to Israel.
    Subjective morality is the slippery slope. As Jews we need to lead by action. Our actions need to be beyond reproach, even more so.
    Mr. Pollard chose his destiny by not adhering to the rules of the game. His ticket was his security clearance and that gave him access to information he shared in violation of the trust that accompanies the granting of the security clearance. The real question is, why did the embassy not let him in? That was their chance. To come back 28 years later and “demand” his freedom ihas a certain audacity. To compare “scandals” as a basis for arguing release is somewhat disingenuous and arrogant. “Everyone else is spying so let our spy go”.
    Look at this objectively. Research the facts. Ask what you would do under similar circumstances. I’m not sure the resulting outcome would be the same.
    Less a tragedy, more of some bad decisions, trying to be justified and righted after the fact.
    Shabbat Shalom.
    REPLY


    • Alex H.
      December 30, 2013 
    • 9:51 am

      Nobody is disputing that he violated the laws of the United States. That is clear. Nobody is disputing that Israel threw him under the bus. That too is clear.
      But the reason he should have been released years ago is supported by your logic. He committed a crime and did his time–5 years the time.
      The only “arrogance” here involves your ego and that of some of the American officials involved. Just because you don’t like what he did does not mean that he deserves to sit in jail for the rest of his life. If we were speaking about a Muslim or an African American, there is no chance that he would still be in jail.
      REPLY


  • Degel
    December 27, 2013 
  • 12:52 am

    “He asserted that if the ex-spy were a Filipino-American or South Korean-American, he would no longer be in prison.”
    Add to this list 10 Rissian spys which were sent home without any charges. Unfortunaly our president befreinds with all filths of the world and Israel is not one of them…
    REPLY


  • Kevin Gilday
    December 26, 2013 
  • 11:06 pm

    In actuality, Mr.Pollard was double-crossed by the US legal system. Specifically,according to his plea agreement with the prosecution; he would not receive a sentence which was tantamount to draconian. Unfortunately, at the time of his sentencing — the government negated the previously agreed upon plea agreement and saddled him with the maximum prison sentence. These facts make one wonder: What is the real reason Mr. Pollard is still languishing
    in the gulag after so many years?
    REPLY


  • Jean
    December 26, 2013 
  • 10:36 pm

    Please be aware that the US government quit speaking for the American people yrs. ago. It is now an entity unto itself with it’s own agenda, that is not even benign to it’s own populace.
    REPLY


  • David Most
    December 26, 2013 
  • 9:51 pm

    Always remember that this President listened to the Rev. Wright spew his anti-Semitism for many Sunday services in Chicago. They had their effect.
    He also has quietly been a supporter of the vicious, hate-filled, Louis Farrakhan of Chicago. Now consider those in his inner circle: Valerie Jarret, Susan Rice, etc., all part of his private Chicago insider group.
    Not much chance that this President would look at the Pollard case and conclude, enough is enough.
    REPLY


  • Efram Paul
    December 26, 2013 
  • 9:30 pm

    Obama is an anti-Semite. Virtually all of his actions attest to that, including the travesty of an agreement with Iran. He is really making no effort to disguise his Jew hatred and Islamist worshiping. He will never release Pollard.
    Obama’s actions have been blatantly one-sided, and he ignores all criticism. I have come to believe that he is hoping for the triumph of terrorism over Israel and the US, the country for which he is sworn to protect. He is far more likely to genuflect to Khameini than to ever end the long-term injustice of the incarceration of Jonathan Pollard.
    REPLY


  • Beatrix
    December 26, 2013 
  • 9:23 pm

    Israel betrayed Pollard. They wouldn’t admit that he worked for them for several years. Israel finally told the truth and has been supporting him ever since. Or seems to be. America betrayed him. The Government made an agreement with him for a lighter sentnce in return for information, then said nothing when the judge ignored the agreement. Caspar Weinberger, Reagan’s Secretary of Defense, went before the judge and asked for an exceptional sentence for reasons that we weren’t told. Before he died, Weinberger admitted Pollards sins were “minor,” but never asked for Pollard’s release.
    It’s possible Pollard knows something that’s still harmful to Israel or America that the government wants kept quiet. Or he’s the example to other Jews who might think it’s okay to help Israel.
    REPLY


    • Kris Kristian
      December 27, 2013 
    • 8:50 am

      The US is afraid to release Pollard.
      If he is released, and sent to Israel, he will reveal the truth about how the US spied on Israel. How the USS Liberty was spying on Israel during the Yom Kippur war, and sent messages to Egypt, which could have really damaged Israel, and more young Israeli soldiers would have died.
      US condemned the IAF for bombing the Liberty, in which some sailors died. That tragey must be blamed on the US govenment
      So many US Chrsitians have written letters condemning Israel for the USS Liberty.
      But they do not know, or want to know the truth.
      POLLARD KNOWS THE TRUTH. SO, keep him locked up, so that he cannot tell the world how the US tried to destroy Israel.
      REPLY


  • David Levy
    December 26, 2013 
  • 8:56 pm

    Israel needs to arrest a couple of American spies, then trade them for Pollard. Even Obana will understand that.
    REPLY


  • BuckDePublick
    December 26, 2013 
  • 8:46 pm

    Pollard is a Jewish hero, plain and simple, and his lengthy incarceration is the direct result of pervasive hatred of Jews found in various sectors of the government. Not only was the information he passed vital to potentially saving Jewish lives, its revelation did NOTHING to harm U.S. security. However, “Kapo” Caspar Weinberger–because he loathed his crypto-Jewish bloodlines and wished to demonstrate what a good Episcopalian he was–did his utmost to crucify Pollard. The Pollard affair demonstrates not only that, as Jews, we have few true friends…but that some of our most virulent enemies are those who will go to any length to expunge even the last vestiges of Jewish identity.
    REPLY


    • Marshall E. Schwartz
      December 26, 2013 
    • 10:53 pm

      Buck in correct to lay the blame at the feet of Cap the Knife (AKA Casper Weinberger), who loathed his Jewish heritage. However, I strongly question whether Pollard is/was a hero. He did get paid, after all…
      REPLY


  • P gaetti
    December 26, 2013 
  • 7:24 pm

    Pollard is been in prison for so many years and it is about time he is released . he deserves to be free ,The Obama administration has double standards
    REPLY


    • Mel
      December 30, 2013 
    • 7:10 pm

      No, the Obama Administration has NO standards. How could it? It is led by a Muslim (or dhimmi) slave who, like all his fellow Muslim boys, was indoctrinated to hate Jews and loathe their presence in the Middle East. He is also angry that he was not permitted to become a walking human bomb when he met with Jewish leaders in Israel, the dream of every Muslim child so brainwashed. By 2014, the Muslim Brotherhood will control Washington, if Obama has anything to say about it. He would nuke Cairo if his masters would let him. And no, neither the American electorate nor the Democratic Party are his master. Pollard might know. Snowden surely knows.
      REPLY


  • Jill Maleson
    December 26, 2013 
  • 7:04 pm

    Pollard’s release should come before any more killers’ of Jews are released from Israel jails. Double standards do not prevail.
    REPLY


  • E.Karafin
    December 26, 2013 
  • 6:58 pm

    A strong argument … very well put
    REPLY


  • Alex H.
    December 26, 2013 
  • 6:02 pm

    Very well put
    REPLY


  • fiona scharf
    December 26, 2013 
  • 5:54 pm

    Isi, I am proud to know you and proud of all that you stand for, not least of all this article !
    REPLY


  • David D
    December 26, 2013 
  • 5:43 pm

    Isi your observations are uncannily astute. I would certainly go so far as to say that the trust he has placed on foreign and corrupt leaders is a clear demonstration of his inability to recognize the facts for what they are. The support of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the blind faith in the new Iranian regime are shockingly concerning.
    REPLY


  • Daniel N.
    December 26, 2013 
  • 4:29 pm

    The injustustice is astonishing. Pollard should be released as soon as possible.
    REPLY



Palestinian Refugees – Reality Test

The actual number of the 1948/9 Palestinian refugees was 320,000,
The actual number of the 1948/9 Palestinian refugees was 320,000,
Originally published at The Ettinger Report.
The Root Cause Then and NowAccording to the German Middle East expert, Fritz Grobba (Men and Powers in the Orient, pp. 194-7, 207-8, Berlin, 1957), the 1948 Palestinian leadership, headed by the Grand Mufti, Haj Amin Al-Husseini, wanted to apply Nazi methods to massacre Jews throughout the Middle East.In1941,the Mufti drafted a proposal requesting that Germany and Italy acknowledge the Arab right to settle "the Jewish problem” in Palestine and the Arab countries in accordance with national and racial Arab interests, similar to the practice employed to solve "the Jewish problem” in Germany and Italy. On Nov. 24, 1947, Acting Chairman of the (Palestinian) Arab Higher Committee, Jamal Al-Husseini, threatened: "Palestine shall be consumed with fire and blood," if the Jews get any part of it.  On April 16, 1948 Jamal Husseini told the UN Security Council: "The representative of the Jewish Agency told us yesterday that they were not the attackers, that the Arabs had begun the fighting. We did not deny this. We told the whole world that we were going to fight.”

On January 9, 2013, Mahmoud Abbas pledged allegiance to the Grand Mufti, who collaborated intimately with the Nazi leadership, especially with Himmler, Hitler's most ruthless right hand man: "On the anniversary of Fatah, we renew the pledge to our fortunate martyrs…. We pledge to continue on the path of the martyrs…. Here we must remember the pioneers – the Grand Mufti of Palestine, Haj Amin Al-Husseini….”
Who Is Responsible? The Chairman of the PLO and the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, admitted that in 1948, "Arab armies forced Palestinians to leave their homes (the PLO's weekly, Filastin A-Thawra, March 1976).”  On May 13, 2008, Al Ayyam, thesecond largest pro-Mahmoud Abbas Palestinian daily, claimed: "[In 1948] the Arab Liberation Army (ALA) told Palestinians to leave their houses and villages, and return a few days later, so the ALA can fulfill its mission.”

The Head of Britain's Middle East Cairo Office, John Troutbeck, reported in June 1949:  "Arab refugees speak with utmost bitterness of Egypt and other Arab states.  They know who their enemies are. Their Arab brothers persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes.” Sir Alan Cunningham, the last British High Commissioner in Palestine, wrote on April 28, 1948 that the total evacuation was urged on the Haifa Arabs from higher Arab quarters. The US Consul General in Haifa telegraphed on April 25, 1948 that "Reportedly, Arab Higher Committee is ordering all Arabs to leave."

The Secretary General of the Arab League, Azzam Pasha told the Lebanese daily, Al Hoda, on June 8, 1951:  "In 1948, we were assured that Palestine's occupation would be a military promenade…. Brotherly advice to Arabs in Palestine was to leave their homes temporarily.” The London Economist wrote on October 2, 1948: "The most potent of the factors [triggering the Arab flight] were the announcements by the Higher Arab Executive, urging the Arabs to quit…. It was clearly intimated that those Arabs who remained in Haifa and accepted Jewish protection would be regarded as renegades….” Syria's Prime Minister, Khaled al-Azam,admitted, in his 1973 memoirs, that "We brought destruction upon the refugees, by calling on them to leave their homes.”

According to the first US Ambassador to Israel, James G. McDonald (My Mission In Israel,Simon and Schuster, NY, 1951, pp.174-6):  "These Arabs… fled from Palestine as the result of mass panic when the wealthy Arabs, almost to a man, began running away in Nov. 1947…. The flight was provoked by lurid tales of Jewish sadism issued by the Mufti and his followers… Superstitious and uneducated, the Arab masses succumbed to the panic and fled… The refugees were on [Arab leaders'] hands as the result of a war, which they had begun and lost….”
How Many Refugees? The Regional Context While the actual number of the 1948/9 Palestinian refugees was 320,000,  Dr. Yoel Guzansky writes that about one third of Syria's 23 million population have recently lost their homes, and over two million (and growing ) have found refuge in neighboring Arab countries. 1.2 million refugees are in Jordan, intensifying domestic instability; 800,000  (Sunni Muslims) fled to Lebanon, aggravating Shite-Sunni sectarian terrorism and constituting an existential threat; 700,000 are in Turkey, 250,000 in Iraq and 125,000 in Egypt. One million Libyans have fled their country, which has become increasingly violent and unstable since the 2011 toppling and assassination of Kaddafi. Half a million refugees from Ethiopia, Somali, Djibouti and the Sudan have reached Yemen, which is burdened by a similar number of Yemenites, who lost their home due to tribal, religion, ideological and geographic domestic strife. 

IRAN UPDATE… POLITICS TROUBLING AND CONFUSING. MISSILE FUZING, AND GUIDANCE CAPABILITIES ADVANCING RAPIDLY. BREAKOUT DATE SUBJECT OF WH-AGENCY DISPUTE


STAGE TWO OF RAPPROCHEMENT BETWEEN OBAMA AND KHAMEINI,  JOINT MILITARY ACTIONS 

Immediate fruit of this partnership:  Capture of Majid al-Majid, head of the the terrorist organization that bombed the Iranian embassy in Beirut as well as Hezbollah targets in Lebanon.

The real story : US-Iranian alliance, a partnership which will allow the US to essentially withdraw for the Middle East leaving the region’s stability to the gentle ministrations of its new “special relationship,” Iran!  

WATCH THESE:

IRAN has ADVANCED PATRIOT MISSILE TECHNOLOGY Israel is very ANGRY us military worried
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47sKzbJj1sU

US and Iran's First Joint Military Venture: Fighting al Qaeda in Iraq
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53yHqyxA4Qg


With the Geneva Nuclear Accord still far from implementation a month after it was signed in Geneva, the United States and Iran are moving into stage two of their rapprochement: They are now fighting together to crush Al Qaeda terror in Iraq, DEBKAfile’s exclusive military sources report.

Iraq is two weeks into a major offensive for cutting al Qaeda down - the first major military challenge the jihadists have faced in the past six years. Three armies are fighting alongside Iraq: the United States, Iran’s Al Qods Brigades officers and Syria.

Their mission is to foil Al Qaeda’s drive to spread its first independent state in the Middle East across the Iraqi-Syrian frontier. Its Iraqi and Syrian branches - ISIS and the Nusra Front - have declared a holy war to this end under their commanders Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi and Abu Mohammed al-Golani.

The Anbar province of Western Iraq is the scene of he fiercest combat close to Iraq’s borders with Syria and Jordan.

To counter Al Qaeda’s superiority in speed and surprise, the US has sent the Iraqi army Hellfire surface-to-air missiles. They are already in use against al Qaeda camps on the Syrian border. Next, Washington is sending out small, long-endurance unmanned aerial ScanEagles. These drones are best suited to combat in Anbar’s deep wadis and the halophyte thickets lining the Euphrates River.

In this topsy-turvy scenario, Washington and Tehran share another surprising motive: to save the Assad regime in Damascus from Al Qaeda’s long arms.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov noted approvingly on Dec. 26: “Attitudes are changing in Western countries; they are becoming more realistic in their approach towards the Syrian crisis. The threat of terrorism in Syria, of jihadists coming to power, of creating a caliphate with extremist laws, these are the main problems.”

Since the Syrian chemical issue was addressed in September, Russian-Iranian-American collaboration is going strong. The joint US-Iranian war on al Qaeda is strengthening Tehran’s grip on Iraq as well Syria. It gives Russian President Vladimir Putin hope for keeping al Qaeda away from the Winter Olympics at Sochi – an ever-present menace as a female suicide bomber, a Dagestan national, demonstrated Sunday, Dec. 29, by blowing up the railway station at the southern Russian city of Volgograd, killing up to a score of people.

The other incentive for US President Barack Obama is the hope of transposing his collaboration with Tehran and Moscow to improve US chances of a reasonable accommodation in the Afghanistan arena.