Thursday, April 19, 2018

An Honest Comey Interview
Kimberley A Strassel April 19, 2018 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/an-honest-comey-interview-1524177845?mod=itp&mod=djemITP_h

Questions nobody is asking the former FBI director—but somebody should.


James Comey and his memoir are tripping the media light fantastic, though what’s defined that trip so far is its lack of news. Mr. Comey explains the many and varied ways that he does not like President Trump. Mr. Comey explains the many and varied ways that he does like himself. Tell us something we don’t know.

People forget that directors of the Federal Bureau of Investigation—by necessity—are among Washington’s most skilled operators, experts in appearing to answer questions even as they provide pablum. Yet the publicity tour rolls on, which means that upcoming interviewers still have an opportunity to do the country—and our profession—a favor. Here are a few basic questions Mr. Comey should be expected to answer:

• You admit the Christopher Steele dossier was still “unverified” when the FBI used it as the basis of a surveillance warrant against Carter Page. Please explain. Also explain the decision to withhold from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the dossier was financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

• You refer to Mr. Steele as a “credible” source. Does the FBI routinely view as “credible” sources who work for political operatives? Did the FBI do any due diligence on his employer, Fusion GPS? Were you aware it is an opposition-research firm? If not, why not?

• Mr. Steele by his own admission briefed the press on the dossier in the fall of 2016, to harm the Trump campaign, although the FBI ordered him not to. Are these the actions of a “credible” source? The sourcing in these articles—particularly one that ran in Yahoo News—was hard to mistake. Yet the FBI soon after assured the FISA court that its “credible” source had not spoken to the media. Either the FBI failed to follow up on the stories, or it did and Mr. Steele lied to your agents. Which is it?

• You say you knew the dossier was funded by a “Democrat-aligned” group but that you “never knew” which one. Why not? Didn’t the FBI have a duty to find out?

• Please explain the extraordinary accommodations the FBI provided Team Clinton during the email investigation. Why was Cheryl Mills —whose emails suggest she had early knowledge of the irregular server as Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff—allowed to claim attorney-client privilege and represent Mrs. Clinton at her interview? Why did that interview happen only at the end? Especially since you say any case hung entirely on her “intent”?

• You’ve surely now read the texts between the FBI’s Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. That happened on your watch. Is this appropriate FBI behavior? Should we believe such behavior is limited to them? In addition to overt political bias, the texts prove the FBI took politics into account—worrying, for instance, about how much manpower to put into investigating the woman who could be our “next president.” Why should the public have any faith in the integrity of the Clinton or Trump investigation?

• The texts ridicule former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s decision to step aside from the Clinton probe, “since she knows no charges will be brought.” This was before the FBI even interviewed Mrs. Clinton. And it contradicts your claim at the start of your July 2016 press conference that no one at the Justice Department knew what you were about to say. Please explain.

• Former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s leak and “lack of candor” also happened on your watch. Should he be prosecuted for lying? Should Mr. Steele be prosecuted for lying to the FBI about his leaks to the press? If the answer to either is no, please explain why the FBI holds one standard for the public, and one for its own.

• You dismiss Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s memo as nothing but a “pretext” to fire you. Yet you don’t address its claims. Please point to the internal policies or regulations that gave you the authority to announce that Mrs. Clinton was being cleared and why. Please provide any examples of similar announcements by FBI directors. Please address the criticisms of the prior attorneys general and deputy attorneys general from both parties cited in the Rosenstein memo.

• You justify your decisions to divulge FBI investigation details on the grounds it served “the public interest.” Would it not have been in the public interest to make clear last year that the president was not under investigation?

• Sometimes, making everybody mad is a sign of doing things right. More often, it’s a sign you screwed up. Mr. Comey, is it possible, just maybe, that you made a mess of things?



http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/app/uploads/2018/04/E_091_18.pdf      [ This pdf  provides information about each of the 32 individual Gazans killed (there may be two additional Gazans about whom we have no information).

SUMMARY/ OVERVIEW: 

Identities of Gazans Killed During the “Great Return March” [ March 30 & April 6, 2018]April 19, 2018

During and after the events of “great return march” that began on March 20, 2018, between 32 and 34 Palestinians were killed (as of April 11, 2018). Most of them have been identified as terrorist operatives affiliated with Hamas and the other terrorist organizations operating in the Gaza Strip. Most of them were killed while rioting against IDF forces. Some were killed while carrying out terrorist attacks, attempting to cross the border security fence between Israel and the Gaza Strip, or in IDF attacks following terrorist activities carried out during the “great return march.”

• According to the initial ITIC analysis, 26 of the 32 (about 80%) Gazans killed were terrorist operatives affiliated with terrorist organizations, primarily Hamas. Nine were operatives in military wings and four in the security forces. The others were identified as affiliated with the terrorist organizations after death notices were issued by the organization or when their bodies were wrapped in organization flags at their funerals. Regarding the six whose organizational affiliation was not identified, it can be assumed that they were civilians.
• The affiliation of the terrorists identified the following:
• Hamas: Five of the Gazans killed were identified as operatives of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’ military-terrorist wing. Four were identified as operatives in the security forces controlled by Hamas and involved in their activities (such as the military police). Seven were identified as being affiliated with Hamas after Hamas held memorial services or issued death notices for them, or they were buried wrapped in Hamas flags. One of them was identified as affiliated with the Islamic Bloc, Hamas’ student movement.
• Fatah: Six of the Gazans killed as operatives of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Fatah’s military-terrorist wing. Four were identified as affiliated with the organization because Fatah issued death notices for them and their bodies were wrapped and buried in Fatah flags.
• Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ): One of the Gazans killed was identified as an operative of the Jerusalem Brigades, the PIJ’s military-terrorist wing.
• Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP): Two of the Gazans killed were identified as DFLP operatives. One was identified as an operative in the military-terrorist wing and the other described as a senior organization figure in the Nuseirat refugee camp.
• Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP): One of the Gazans killed was identified as a PFLP operative.
The high percentage of operatives of Hamas and the other terrorist organizations clearly indicates their central role in the front lines of demonstrators and those who clashed with the IDF. There is a glaring absence of the “civilian” activists who were central in preparing for the march but who were left behind when the violence began.

 The pdf ( above) provides information about each of the 32 individual Gazans killed (there may be two additional Gazans about whom we have no information).

Tuesday, April 17, 2018


WHEN IT COMES TO REVEALING POSSIBLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST WHEN REPORTING ON  AND/OR DISCUSSING  THE NEWS I AM IN FAVOR OF 100% DISCLOSURE.


 However, this thorough and public disclosure should be universal.

 For example, Ruth Marcus’  husband was a prominent official in the Obama administration.  Benjamin Rhodes brother was president of a major pro Obama network. These relationships were never reported when these and other individuals appeared for interviews on PBS or on the major networks. Martha Raddatz has had deep family and social connection with the Clintons and with the Obamas. 

The Jewish Journal roundtable had four entries discussing Sean Hannity with  the title: “what does  Sean Hannity scandal say about Fox news?” The headline itself exhibits bias by using the word “scandal”.  And, all four entries are negative. 

Yet, similar  fair questions concerning Rod Rosenstein, James Comey, Robert Mueller, John Brennan [who have  much hidden in their history and many more  troubling conflicts of interest ]remain, for the most part unexplored by the mainstream media.

 For example immediately below  are some materials relating to the political orientation and activities of Rod Rosenstein’s wife, Lisa H Barsoomian . Obviously, these materials have been obtained from right of center sources… However, the   facts presented are correct and the questions raised are legitimate.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST ROD ROSENSTEIN: 
Rod Rosenstein has no business involving himself in the Hillary Clinton-DNC funded Steele dossier, and the ongoing Russia investigation.
Much less the selection of his mentor and his wife’s mentor Robert Muller as Special Counsel.

impartiality? that appears  impossible.
The rules of ethics “required his recusal."
But there was no such recusal.

Why does Lisa H Barsoomian  merit any mention?…..BECAUSE…..Lisa H Barsoomian is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE

Lisa H Barsoomian   BACKGROUND.

Lisa H Barsoomian a US Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law,  she’s a protege of James Comey and Robert Muller

Barsoomian with her boss R Craig Lawrence represented Bill Clinton in 1998
Lawrence also represented
Robert Muller three times
James Comey five times
Barack Obama 45 times
Kathleen Sebelius 56 times
Bill Clinton 40 times and
Hillary Clinton 17 times

between 1998 and 2017
Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times

 

Lisa H Barsoomian CONCERNS:

Someone  “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals court dockets (?)

Someone “purged”  of the internet of  all information pertaining to Barsoomian.
Historically this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative.
Additionally Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community.

And although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases re
presenting the DC Office of the US Attorney her email address is Lisa Barsoomian at NIH gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health.

This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities.

Does an attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter.


We believe that it does when it deals with Trump and his
recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports,
the border wal
DACA,
everything coming out of California,
the Uniparty unrelenting opposition to President Trump,                                            
the Clapper leaks,
the Comey leaks,
Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal ....
Muller’s  investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians

Why does Barsoomian,  as a CIA operative, merit special  mention?…..BECAUSE…..Lisa H Barsoomian is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE.

Barsoomian’s loyalties appear to be biased  (tainted?).
Could this have influenced Rosenstein?
This clearly violates the appearance of impropriety attorney’s rules?
Both owe their careers as US attorneys to Muller, Obama, Bush, and the Clintons.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST ROD ROSENSTEIN: 
Rod Rosenstein has no business involving himself in the Hillary Clinton-DNC funded Steele dossier, and the ongoing Russia investigation.
Much less the selection of his mentor and his wife’s mentor Robert Muller as Special Counsel.

impartiality? that appears  impossible.
The rules of ethics “required his recusal."
But there was no such recusal.

 REFERRALS FOR FURTHER READING: Caution advised, many of these may be biased…





President Trump’s lawyer, Michael Cohen, found himself on the wrong side of a courtroom Monday after the FBI raided his offices last week. In determining the fate of the seized documents from the raid, Cohen was forced to reveal the name of one of his clients – Sean Hannity – a prominent Fox News host who vehemently condemned the FBI’s raids on Cohen, but who never disclosed his own personal relationship with him. More at Vox.





Representative Adam Schiff’s Nonsensical crusade to Preserve the Iran Deal


In recent weeks, Representative Adam Schiff has been engaged in a campaign to pressure the U.S. not to jettison the nuclear agreement with Iran.

Schiff’s arguments put forth in favor of maintaining the deal. are, to say the least, lacking:

The first [argument] is that discarding the “deal” could damage the credibility of “major powers”—that is, Britain, France, Germany, and the U.S., which signed it along with China and Russia. . . . However, the EU’s argument about “respecting signatures” [is unconvincing] because nobody signed anything. The so-called Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), [as the agreement is formally known], is no more than a press release stating a set of desirable moves by Iran and the other parties—which, incidentally, didn’t include the EU as such. Moreover, there are significant differences between the JCPOA’s English and Persian versions, making various imaginative re-readings, à la Roland Barthes or Jacques Derrida, possible. . . .

The second argument is that the deal is working and, thus, the dictum “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” applies. That assumption is not borne out by the facts. Iran and the other parties have either tried to circumvent or have brazenly broken their promises. [For instance], the Germans and the French still refuse to issue export guarantees to firms seeking trade with Iran. Huge memorandums of understanding are signed but put on the back-burner as Iran remains subject to sanctions by the United Nations, the EU, and U.S. . . .


Ironically, the only [country] that has partially complied with the deal is the U.S., including through the mafia-style smuggling of $1.7 billion in cash to Tehran and the transfer of $700 million a month since August 2015. Iran, for its part, asserts that there has been no change in its nuclear project. . . . More importantly, Iran has managed to block international inspection of key research and development centers by claiming they are military sites and thus off limits.

Sunday, April 15, 2018

Can You Spot the Gazan Terrorists Hiding with the Journalists
Photo of the Day April 15, 2018


pastedGraphic.png
Can you find the terrorist hiding with the journalists?

Just meters from the border, a Gazan terrorist used the cover of journalists and a man on crutches to try and plant a bomb along the fence. The bomb exploded on the Gazan side, and multiple people were injured.
It is unknown if any journalist association filed a complaint with Hamas for endangering their lives (but they probably did not).


The man on crutches appears in a number of IDF videos taken along the fence, in the center of the action.

An Open Letter to my Fellow American Jews by NITZAKHON April 14, 2018

An Open Letter to my Fellow American Jews 

by NITZAKHON   April 14, 2018


Impossible to get the full impact of this article without clicking on this URL, which will allow you to view the many film clips that the e-mail format disallows.



This was not an easy to write; I suspect it will be difficult to read as well.  I don’t want to be harsh, I don’t want to be nasty, but this is a “tough love” message that needs saying.  Let me not waste time.

THE MISSING INSTINCT
In Civilizational Collapse and the Brain, I hypothesized about a possible biological explanation for why it is that civilizations collapse.  The theory – go read the whole thing, I think it’s definitely one of my best pieces! – is simple: comfort and safety from birth lead to an atrophy of the threat recognition ability.  My essay mentions, and I think ties in very well with, the r/K reproductive strategy switch, which is ably related alongside other thoughts by Bill Whittle in this video:
Civilizations collapse from within, because people let the destructor in; one example is The Barbarians Who Sacked Rome Came Into the Empire as Refugees.  Who is coming in now?  My essay has several examples about today’s Islamic treatment of various groups who, nonetheless, take their side; this excerpt below, specifically, focuses on Jews (links in original):

[M]y fellow Jews in America want more Islamic refugees to America… despite Synagogues in France (let alone elsewhere in Europe) needing armed guards 24/7 and even concertina wire atop newly-installed high fences with closed-circuit cameras for protection against those very same refugees.  Synagogues are firebombed by Islamists, Rabbis openly talk about needing protection to live openly-Jewish lives, anti-Semitism is rising, Muslims across Europe scream “Jews, remember Khaybar” – a reference to a battle where Mohammed slaughtered Jews en masse.  Despite all these, and Imams all over calling for Jews to be killed – in Houston, in California, in Holland, inNorth Carolina, everywhere (three alone since President Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital) – and the historical precedent of Mohammed himself and the anti-Semitism codified in the Koran itself… Jews write letters to the editor wanting more migrants.  
“Where is your survival instinct?”
Watch this video.  If you don’t shudder at it but think that this is just another example of wonderful multicultural enrichment </sarcasm> then you’ve lost said survival instinct, if you ever had it.
[NOTE: Again, to see this and other clips, click on the URL above].
In Australia, Muslims are turning areas into NO GO zones just like they have done throughout Europe, and in particular NO JEW GO zones.  France may soon be Judenrein because of Islamic violence against Jews.  Anti-Semitism is at the highest levels since WWII… because of Islamic immigration.
Again I ask: Where has the survival instinct gone?  
DOPAMINE ADDICTS

Between the atrophy of the amygdalae and the hijacking of Tikkun Olam – that noble calling to do good deeds to heal the world – which has been twisted and perverted by liberal Jews to social activism ends.  They’ve done this by in-group praise creating a literal drug addition to the pleasurable feelings created by neurotransmitter production when people get praised for being so “open-minded” and “tolerant” and “generous” and “helpful to those in need” (bolding added, link in the original):
I have just finished "How I Escaped from Political Correctness and You Can Too" by Loretta Breuning, a fascinating book that argues that our political views are more often determined by a need to replenish compounds like oxytocin, dopamine and serotonin generated in our bodies, compounds that we share with more primitive mammals.  It sounds almost crackpot but I have never read anything that explains so well why normally intelligent people adhere to such absurd politically correct views without questioning them.  To vastly oversimplify Breuning's thesis -- she has considerable scientific background -- our mammal-like need for group approval and reassurance, to be part of the herd, which is stimulated by our addiction to those internal compounds, keeps us repeating patterns over and over.

Western Civilization is good; not just for Jews, but everyone.  It is the greatest civilization not only currently, but ever in human history.  Likewise America, specifically, has been good to the Jews:

As a Jew, I am glad that I live in this exceptional Christian Nation. Outside of Israel, there is no place where Jews are more accepted. A Jew need not fear wearing a keepa (yarmulka) in public as one must in virtually every major European city, from London to Paris to Brussels.

Jews advocating for the influx of Islamic refugees into Europe and America are helping to import people whose culture calls for the conquest and subsequent destruction of that greatest civilization… not to mention the enslavement of all non-Muslims generally, and the annihilation of the Jews specifically.  Muslim rule in Spain was not, contrary to popular belief, good for us (better than by the Christians at the time, but in no way good; as the sage Dr. Thomas Sowell asks, "Compared to what?"); see The myth – and Reality – of the Andalusian paradise(bolding added):
His cautious approach may be governed in part by the recognition that, after hundreds of years of enforced coexistence, it can be difficult to determine what came from what. And the difficulty stems in part, because the Islamic conqueror’s rule often allowed communities of Jews or Christians to live within their own conclaves under their own laws, although as dhimmis, humiliated and subject to special taxation.

Under the Pact of Umar, we had to wear yellow markings. Yellow markings… sound familiar?  Where could Hitler have learned that?  Oh, yes, his buddy-buddy relationship with the genocidal Muslim Mufti Amin al-Husseini.
A MODERN CALIPHATE
Muslim leaders in Europe are now talking about the establishment of a 100% Sharia state, and note the impossibility of their claim they don’t want the headscarf but do want Sharia:
“Our goal is a 100% Islamic State, but we don’t mean we want to oblige the headscarf,” the party’s founder Redouane Ahrouch says. “By establishing Sharia law we want to follow the way of the prophet and the Quran”, he adds.
We celebrate Pesach to celebrate our freedom – why would Jews or anyone choose re-enslavement over the freedoms we have in the West?
So let me be blunt-force trauma direct: 
YOUR PRO-ISLAMIC REFUGEE VIRTUE-SIGNALLING IS A CIVILIZATION-KILLING DRUG ADDITION!  AT LEAST ADDICTS JUST KILL THEMSELVES; YOU ARE MURDERING AN ENTIRE CIVILIZATION SO YOU CAN FEEL GOOD ABOUT YOURSELF!!!!!!
DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY

Go read about Muslim demographics in Europe.  And one quote, pulled, originally from here:
In 1974, former Algerian President Houari Boumediene said in a speech at the UN:
"One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere to go to the northern hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give the victory."

Scared yet?  Or does your local Shul need to be firebombed by people screaming Allahu Akhbar, or do Jewish-owned shops in your neighborhood need to be attacked, or will it take your child’s religious school getting theIslamic Beslan treatment?  Muslims  have surveilled Jewish schools in America: NYC: Muslima caught on video taking photos of Jewish school… somehow I doubt this out of concern for the safety of the exits.  American churches are installing metal detectors because of the thread of Islamic terror.  Imams in the US call for Jews to be killed; Three U.S. Imams have Called for Death of Jews Since Trump's Jerusalem Announcement (bolding added):
In the latest incident, Abdullah Khadra, a Syrian-American imam, announced during a sermon in a Raleigh, North Carolina-area mosque on Monday that Jews should be killed. The sermon was taped and transcribed by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI)¸ a nonprofit group.

"The Prophet Muhammad gave us the glad tidings that...we will fight those Jews until the rocks and the trees will speak: Oh Muslim, this is a Jew behind me," Khadra said. MEMRI suggests that the words have a known connotation that Khadra did not say, but his listeners understood. “The continuation of the well-known Hadith is that the rocks and the trees say: ‘Come and kill him,’” MEMRI reported.
Do they need to start actually doing it??  Remember that Mohammed was a refugee who fled Mecca and was taken in by the Jews of Medina.  How did that end for them?

Consider the flight of Jews from Europe because of the Jew-hating Muslims flooding in, the fears of Jews who are still in Europe, never mind the burgeoning flight of Europeans from their native landsexplosion of crimes like rapeat the hands of Muslims who view kaffir women as legitimate and Islamic-lawful targets. Does your child need to be bullied and have death threats from Muslim children, like are now being seen in Europe (bolding added):
A latest incident of school bullying has again highlighted the issue of antisemitism among Germany’s Muslim youth. The case involves a second-grade Jewish girl at a Berlin elementary school who was bullied by her Muslim classmates.

The authorities apparently tried to downplay the incident, with school headmaster initially describing the death threat issued to the Jewish girl by her Muslim classmates as a conversation “on the topic of faith and religion.”
Do you have to be assaulted by a Muslim immigrant who deliberately searched for Jews to target (links in the original; bolding restructured):
The worst anti-Semitic hate crime of 2018 took place outside a restaurant in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Izmir Koch
an Ahiska Turkish migrant who had already been in trouble with the law, allegedly demanded to know if there were any Jews around. A man who been at the restaurant replied that he was Jewish. Izmir punched him in the head, and then kicked him while he lay on the ground.

The victim, who wasn’t actually Jewish, suffered bruised ribs and a fractured eye socket.
In the New York Times (bolding added):
Anti-Semitism was supposed to be a disease of the far right. But the people actually killing Jews in France these days are not members of the National Front. They are Islamists.
The major crimes against the Jewish community — Ilan Halimi, the Toulouse killings, the Hyper Cacher killings, Sarah Halimi — all of them have all been carried out by radicalized Muslims,” Robert Ejnes, the executive director of CRIF, an umbrella organization of French Jewish groups, told me in a call from Paris. “These young people have French identity cards, but they hate what France stands for. This is the nature of the problem we are facing. And it’s very hard to talk about.”
How many more Jews will have to be harassed, assaulted, tortured, and killed before the obvious becomes apparent to those who profess to be fighting antisemitism?

See here too, Anti-Semitism Worldwide: It’s Getting Worse.  Why worse?  An influx of Muslims.
A French woman who survived the Shoah was murdered by a Muslim immigrant because she was Jewish.  And this picture is from Germany; do you really think they’re going to be friendlier to Jews once they’ve taken over? 

This mosque is in Canada – CANADA! – where a video shows children being taught to behead kaffirs:

[Canada Mosque Kids Acting Out Beheading / 2:15]


INVITING IN THE DESTROYER
Intelligent people learn from the lessons and experiences of others, read historical accounts of similar situations resulting in catastrophe, and think “Maybe this isn’t a good idea”.
[Enslaving and converting Infidels Is One of the Virtues of Islam / 3:33]

Meanwhile, many Jews, especially American Jews, seemingly double-down-determined in helping the Islamic destroyer come in.  They even compare the current refugee crisis to the plight of pre-WWII European Jews when, in fact, that is manifestly not the case, e.g., No, Middle Eastern refugees can’t be compared to Holocaust victims:

However, it is incorrect to draw a parallel between the Jews who fled Europe in the 1930s, who were, as Jews, specific targets for genocide and Nazi concentration camps, and those today wishing to escape the civil war in their Mideast countries.  The Syrians, for example, are not being targeted because they are Muslims, and there is no Final Solution planned against them.  Their civil wars have placed them in difficult circumstances, but their situation is not comparable to the deliberate and planned Final Extermination specifically directed at Jews as Jews during the once-in-history Holocaust. It's a different category altogether.
Furthermore, comparisons to the Holocaust situation are improper, for (2) there were no Nazi agents embedded within the fleeing Jews, (3) the Jews did not harbor a cultural or religious ideology wishing to sow physical destruction among the American people, and (4) there were no rabbis in the 1930s sending forth commands worldwide to destroy the "infidels."  Indseed, (5) the completely innocent Jews of Europe had nowhere to go, no country to take them in – there was not yet a State of Israel – whereas there are 57 Islamic states, many exceedingly wealthy, who could be providing safe haven to their Islamic brothers.

THE CONCLUDING BRICKS ON THE JEWELER’S SCALE
Morally, this is wrong:

Europe and America do not belong to us; they are not ours to give away just so we can feel good about ourselves,dopamine-addict-style.  Any Jew who advocates for the ongoing influx, which is already seeing bitter fruit of whole swaths of countries being rendered conquered Islamic territory, is helping theft on the grandest of scales.
Thou Shalt Not Steal (Exodus 20:15)
Let alone being an accessory / enabler of every murder they commit.

Thou Shalt Not Murder (Exodus 20:13)
And while helping others is good, it cannot be done at the price of your own life – or by extension the life of the country / civilization in which you live (bolding added):
This was the accepted opinion until Rabbi Akiva came and taught that the verse states: “And your brother shall live with you,” indicating that your life takes precedence over the life of the other.

And it's pure suicide:
“Judgment Day will not come before the Muslims fight the Jews, and the Jews will hide behind the rocks and the trees, but the rocks and the trees will say: Oh Muslim , oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him…”

They said and did it back then; What Happened to the Jews of Arabia? 
 
They say it now.  Here, in the US.

“When someone says they want to kill you, believe them.”
-- Elie Wiesel

By word and deed, in America and Europe, they say they want to kill us.  I have the moral courage to believe them. Why don't you?


© 2018, NITZAKHON